THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    LATimes freaks out over .500 S&W

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
LATimes freaks out over .500 S&W Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of HunterJim
posted
The LATimes freaks out over the S&W .500 S&W:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gun14feb14,1,4386121.story?coll=la%2Dhome%2Dtodays%2Dtimes

"A hunting weapon? That's a joke," said Luis Tolley, director of state legislation for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "What we have here is a weapon that's designed to appeal to people who just want to make a bigger hole in whatever they're shooting at. And, hopefully, they're not living next door to me."

jim dodd

[ 02-14-2003, 21:29: Message edited by: HunterJim ]
 
Posts: 4166 | Location: San Diego, CA USA | Registered: 14 November 2001Reply With Quote
<Varmint Hunter>
posted
It just goes to show that its time for Ruger to build a 700 Express pistol on a steroid laden Redhawk frame. [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]

[ 02-14-2003, 21:30: Message edited by: Varmint Hunter ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of redial
posted Hide Post
Pray, exactly what does Luis Tolley know about hunting that he can publicly designate which are hunting-suitable and which are not? Too, he's obviously clairvoyant - possessing telepathic powers that allow him to devine the intent of anyone who would buy such a gun or those of its designers.

Liberals must think mighty highly of themselves to expect to say such things in a public forum and still be considered credible or relevant.

Redial

[ 02-14-2003, 21:52: Message edited by: redial ]
 
Posts: 1121 | Location: Florence, MT USA | Registered: 30 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Nitroman
posted Hide Post
Linky no worky. Copy and pasty.
 
Posts: 1844 | Location: Southwest Alaska | Registered: 28 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I love how the LA Times stated that it would end up "in the hands of juvenile gang members." Last time I checked, one had to be 21 and not a felon to purchase a handgun? And I doubt those types will spend almost a grand on a 5 or 6 shot revolver...
 
Posts: 454 | Location: Califon, NJ USA | Registered: 18 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BER007
posted Hide Post
Here is the complete article

"
SMITH AND WESSON

By Ralph Frammolino and Steve Berry, Times Staff Writers

Even the most ardent firearm lovers acknowledge that Smith & Wesson's new .50-caliber Magnum revolver is more gun than anyone needs.

It has double the power of most assault rifles in America. Its kick can send a grown man reeling; a single bullet can drop a grizzly.

It is so heavy and long that police say no criminal would dare try to hide it in his waistband. It will cost as much as $989.

And gun buyers across the country can't wait to get their hands on it.

"The initial reaction has been even stronger than we had anticipated, so we're ramping up production to meet the demand," Bob Scott, Smith & Wesson Corp.'s chairman, said from the 2003 Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trade Show in Orlando, Fla.

"Certainly, in our booth it's the product that has created the most buzz."

The Springfield, Mass.-based company, creator of the .44 Magnum of "Dirty Harry" fame, unveiled its new offering Thursday as the world's most powerful commercially produced revolver. Executives for the country's second-largest firearms manufacturer said they hoped the gun would help regain lost market share by generating excitement among an important, albeit niche, market of big-game hunters, collectors and recreational target shooters.

But even before the weapon's wide distribution, scheduled for next month, forces on both sides of the firearms debate are taking aim at its social effects.

Gun control groups condemned the Model 500 as an example of the industry's "deadlier-is-better" mentality, predicting that the new model would soon find its way to the streets.

"A hunting weapon? That's a joke," said Luis Tolley, director of state legislation for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "What we have here is a weapon that's designed to appeal to people who just want to make a bigger hole in whatever they're shooting at. And, hopefully, they're not living next door to me."

Said Josh Sugarmann, executive director of the Violence Policy Center: "This gun is not being made for hunters in Africa. It's being made for bored white gun owners in America. Why are they putting so much firepower into people's hands?"

The real question, one gun expert says, is: Why are people demanding it?

Adam Firestone, editor of Cruffler.com, a Web site for gun collectors, said he viewed demand for Smith & Wesson's new product as more of an outgrowth of America's obsession with size and status, rather than an indicator of growing paranoia over crime or homeland security.

"How many people do you know have Lincoln Navigators or Hummer H2s?" he said.

"We are phenomenal at buying beyond our needs. And with regard to the firearm industry, if it is bigger, if it is more expensive ... we will line up around the corner to buy the darned thing, regardless of the fact that there may be six other guns that cost half as much and do the job just as well."

Not everyone is excited about the new firearm. If a Smith & Wesson dealer tried to sell one to George Ashkar, a Santa Monica financial analyst, he would say, "Thanks but no thanks."

"As a novelty gun, as something that let's you say, 'I've got a .50-caliber,' that might be OK," said Ashkar, 56, a former hunter and competition shooter who owns shotguns, rifles and handguns.

But Ashkar thinks it would be of little use for self-defense or hunting because it is too large, it has too much recoil and the ammunition probably will be much more expensive than what people are used to paying.

"Once you take it out a couple of times and feel the recoil and see how difficult it is to handle, it will not be your first choice the next time you go out."

He said the gun would be too heavy for most people to carry around while hunting.

Ashkar said he would have doubts about the accuracy of the weapon and the difficulty of firing a second shot after the recoil from the first.

Smith & Wesson executives hope that the revolver, one of nine models introduced at the Florida gun show Thursday, will put it back in the good graces of a gun-buying constituency that remains sore over the company's decision in 2000 to sign agreements with the federal government that promised to put locks on all firearms it sold.

That backlash served as a double whammy, taking away sales from Smith & Wesson even as the entire industry was in decline.

"We're in the process ofwinning back market share or business that was lost as a result of negative reaction by consumers to the decisions by the previous ownership," said Scott, the company chairman.

Smith & Wesson has built its reputation by building bigger guns.

The .357 Magnum, introduced in 1935, was considered a breakthrough because of its muzzle energy that delivered impact at 535 foot-pounds, said Roy G. Jinks, the company's historian.

The weapon, developed at the behest of hunters, gained favor with police during the mobster era because it could shoot through a car's engine block, he said.

In 1956, Smith & Wesson introduced the even more powerful .44 Magnum, the gun madefamous years later by Clint Eastwood in his crime-fighting movies as "Dirty" Harry Callahan, a San Francisco cop.

With Thursday's unveiling, the company leapfrogs ahead of its competitors, which had surpassed the .44 Magnum with more potent weapons.

The Model 500 uses a bigger frame, takes a new .50-caliber Magnum Smith & Wesson cartridge and packs a muzzle force of 2,600 foot-pounds.

Though there are single-shot, custom pistols that use larger ammunition, the new gun is the largest production revolver or semiautomatic pistol.

At .50-caliber, the cartridge is about half an inch wide but is more powerful than other such ammunition because it is longer and can pack more powder, said Garen Wintemute, a gun expert and director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at UC Davis.

He said the gun's cartridge has about twice the muzzle energy of most rounds for common semiautomatic assault weapons used in America, such as the AR-15, a civilian version of the military's M-16.

Wintemute predicted that it would be a smash with gun enthusiasts, who can order one with a barrel as long as 10 inches.

One such enthusiast is Marc Halcon, owner of American Shooting Center in San Diego.

He said the allure of the weapon "has something to do with the artistry of creating a mechanism that will do something that no other will do. It's another step in science and engineering."

Speaking for himself, Halcon said, "I already own the most powerful handgun on the market, and if they build a more powerful one, then I want to buy it."

Sam Paredes, executive director of the Gun Owners of California, feels much the same.

"I can't wait to shoot one of these things," he said.

Paredes acknowledged that the Model 500 could be portrayed as the "boogeyman of all guns."

He said its recoil would pack such a wallop that it would be virtually impossible for criminals to rely on it � a sentiment shared by Lt. Bruce Harris, the firing range master for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.

"It's a little tough to have one of those under your shirt," Harris said, adding that he didn't believe it would become a street weapon, because "gangbangers don't have $900 to spend on a Smith & Wesson revolver."

Legislation regulating the sale of .50-caliber rifles is scheduled for consideration in the state Assembly and the L.A. City Council, said Tolley of the Brady Campaign. But government officials said Thursday that they had no plans to include the new gun in the restrictions.

Still, Tolley said, his group will work to bring the Model 500 under some kind of control because, despite Smith & Wesson's intentions, the weapon is bound to end up in the wrong hands.

"They're marketing this weapon to people who get off on the idea that they have the biggest, baddest gun on the block," Tolley said.

"Unfortunately, a number of them are going to juvenile gang members and people who have an unhealthy fascination with firearms."

Times researcher John Jackson contributed to this report.

Copyright 2003 Los Angeles Times
By visiting this site, you are agreeing to our Terms of Service.
Privacy Policy
 
Posts: 831 | Location: BELGIUM | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BER007
posted Hide Post
HunterJim,

I tend to agree with one little part of article. The .500 S&W gun wil be huge, heavy and not comfortable to shoot. And will be a gun for collector in most of cases.

But I don't think this gun is a joke for silouette shooters and african games hunters. For sure it isn't a varmint's gun [Big Grin]

I think before writing speculation like the LA Times, we must wait the reaction of buyers of this gun. If the gun is crappy, all shooters will know that very quickly.

This gun will bring about lots of molds and jacketed bullets caliber .500/.501 on the market. That will be great for .50 AE owners. for the rest wait and see.
 
Posts: 831 | Location: BELGIUM | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
<KBGuns>
posted
I dont understand their problem with this gun. Tey say its too big to be concealed, and too powerful to be shot, right? Then is this not exactly the gun you want your gang-bangers to have!?

Maybe they are worried about emergency rooms full of guys with their forehead split open? [Roll Eyes]

Kristofer
 
Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Paul H
posted Hide Post
There problem isn't with this gun, their problem is with all guns. Just read there silly little arguments. They are simpletons that fear what they do not understand, and what they cannot control.
 
Posts: 7213 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Paul H is right they don't like 25 autos because they are to small. They don't like this one because it is to big. The fact is they don't like any gun. Gun control is never about crime it is about control people.
 
Posts: 19741 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Personally I can't wait for the next "Dirty Harry" Movie now! [Big Grin] Wonder what Clint will shoot with this one? [Eek!]
 
Posts: 588 | Location: Central Valley | Registered: 01 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
At .50-caliber, the cartridge is about half an inch wide ...

Wow! This guy is SMART! [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 6034 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Its kick can send a grown man reeling;

which makes it a darn good thing us gunny types never really grow up! [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 6034 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Nitroman
posted Hide Post
Doesn't look too bad to me.
 -
 
Posts: 1844 | Location: Southwest Alaska | Registered: 28 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Shooters would really grab them up if S&W made
a revolving rifle with 18+ inch barrel.Ed.
 
Posts: 27742 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Oldsarge
posted Hide Post
I don't know about you, but I'm not about to put my wrist in from the of the side flash from a really big revolver. Not that I would deny anyone the right to buy one if they wished, but it seems reeaaallllyyyyy silly to me.

[ 02-15-2003, 09:11: Message edited by: Oldsarge ]
 
Posts: 2690 | Location: Lakewood, CA. USA | Registered: 07 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm sorry, but fuck the LA Times.

They have a right to fear gangs, and they should, since they have one of the biggest, and best organized running the drug trade, and God knows what else, in LA, and, that group has 4 million members, and support of the mexican mafia.

However, their stupid fucking solutions are really incredible, and their short term memory about what happens in a riot when all the bad guys have guns, and the police and fire pull out, because they are afraid of getting shot, is just mind boggling(Rodney King riot).

I'm sorry about the language but the idiocy of these people REALLY offends me, and the Second Amendment, not to mention the truly great men that wrote that document.

Please, all, don't BUY the LA Times.

DR S
 
Posts: 1805 | Location: American Athens, Greece | Registered: 24 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 8MM OR MORE
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Oldsarge:
I don't know about you, but I'm not about to put my wrist in from the of the side flash from a really big revolver. Not that I would deny anyone the right to buy one if they wished, but it seems reeaaallllyyyyy silly to me.

Many years ago, I found that my BHawk shot better resting on my closed left fist, with welding glove on........................................................................................................Yes I did, once only, then only with the welding glove after that......................................................................................................That was also the day I found out first hand the effects of "shaving" the bullet..................................................JUST the one time, did I say that already?
 
Posts: 1944 | Location: Moses Lake, WA | Registered: 06 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Oldsarge:
I don't know about you, but I'm not about to put my wrist in from the of the side flash from a really big revolver. Not that I would deny anyone the right to buy one if they wished, but it seems reeaaallllyyyyy silly to me.

Come on Oldsarge. If you can handle the 450 Rigby in a rifle, you should be able to handle a big bore revolver. [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 1002 | Location: Midwest USA | Registered: 01 September 2001Reply With Quote
<1badassmagnum>
posted
THAT JERK IS MOST LIKELY DRIVING A NAVIGATOR AND TRYING TO KILL ME IN MY NISSAN SENTRA!

MAYBE WE SHOULD BAN NAVIGATORS! [Mad] [Mad] [Mad] [Mad]

[ 02-15-2003, 19:54: Message edited by: 1badassmagnum ]
 
Reply With Quote
<quickdraw>
posted
You can't do anything with the liberal media, but the PDF they made is kind of a nice sales flyer that S&W could use [Wink] .

Best,
QD
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BER007
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 831 | Location: BELGIUM | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Lets see... 1) it is an expensive handgun,

2) It is bulky and cant be easily hidden if at all,

3) It will be a difficult firearm to master

Those three items alone tell me the gang bangers wont exactly be wanting them. This guy obviously has no sense of what is available already let alone needed for either steel shoots or dangerous game hunting with a handun. I do see he had to get his blurb about assault weapons in the article. I guess that is obligatory in all antigun articles for some reason. This just once again shows a general lack of understanding on this "experts" part.
 
Posts: 4106 | Location: USA | Registered: 06 March 2002Reply With Quote
<JOHAN>
posted
Gentlemen

Another first class dumb ass is trying sling mudd at guns, gun owners etc. This jerk must have his head up his rear end [Big Grin] [Big Grin]

I hate all these "investigating hippy journalists" that are spreading when lies and twisted facts. I hope LA times goes bankrupt

NO gangbanger would start using this new S&W revolver. It would not be much bang bang, ammo costs to much and is to hard to find [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
/ JOHAN
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Looks good to me. Who will be loading the ammo and what are the ballistics?
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by N E 450 No2:
Looks good to me. Who will be loading the ammo and what are the ballistics?

Corbon will be supplying the ammo, at least at the begining. It is capable of propelling a 440-grain projectile to around 1600 fps. This is not a cup of tea for everybody, as recoil and muzzle blast will be very severe.

Here is the link of their website:

http://www.corbon.com/500s&W.htm
 
Posts: 1002 | Location: Midwest USA | Registered: 01 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Maybe Judy, {AKA RMK after the sex change and entering the witness protection program at the behest of his F-troop handler} could ship a bunch of these new .50's to her ululating bretheren to take out the "infidel" white devils!!!!!
"TED KENNEDY'S CAR HAS KILLED MORE PEOPLE THAN ALL MY GUNS" [Big Grin] [Smile] [Cool] [Roll Eyes] [Wink] [Razz]
 
Posts: 68 | Registered: 10 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would just love to own one of those.

I indeed have a "an unhealthy fascination of firearms" [Big Grin]

what an awsome piece of equipement for whopping roo's of the back of a moving landcruiser ute [Cool]
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
 -

 -
 
Posts: 1002 | Location: Midwest USA | Registered: 01 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I love it. Just seems like it should be a belted cartridge.

[Big Grin]
 
Posts: 1805 | Location: American Athens, Greece | Registered: 24 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I always said 50 was big enough. I want one too.
heh, heh, heh
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
The LA Times....

Home of the most left-leaning liberal gibberish ever printed.

I don't buy it, I don't read it, and regret the fact that some of the stores where my family shops run ads in the Times.

GMAFB!

The .50 is not for me, but if I did want one I'd run right out and buy it.

What an insult to the Constitution...

Best
 
Posts: 24 | Location: So Cal | Registered: 01 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hi all
You lucky 'b****rds! We will never be able to buy anything thing that resembles a pistol quite soon they are considering banning immitation firearms mainly because they are offensive to the minority that shout the loudest!
Here in the U.K all handguns are banned and it won't be long before more legislation is upon us!!
The sat times ran the same story over here, just the anti-gun lobby scaremongering again!!!

Griff
 
Posts: 1179 | Location: scotland | Registered: 28 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
[Wink] I don't know if I'd want one of those big ass double action revolvers but nice little lever action sure would be great! [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 1018 | Location: Lafourche Parish, La. | Registered: 24 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by redial:
Pray, exactly what does Luis Tolley know about hunting that he can publicly designate which are hunting-suitable and which are not? Too, he's obviously clairvoyant - possessing telepathic powers that allow him to devine the intent of anyone who would buy such a gun or those of its designers.

Liberals must think mighty highly of themselves to expect to say such things in a public forum and still be considered credible or relevant.

Redial

Well, almost. But they are insecure enough that they need to constantly boost their self-images by adopting holier-than-thou postures. See Thomas Sowell's THE VISION OF THE ANOINTED - Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy.
 
Posts: 2272 | Location: PDR of Massachusetts | Registered: 23 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of D Humbarger
posted Hide Post
Griff what else do you expect from the englis? Remember once upon a time they banned bagpipes too. Weapons of war they were. [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 8351 | Location: Jennings Louisiana, Arkansas by way of Alabama by way of South Carloina by way of County Antrim Irland by way of Lanarkshire Scotland. | Registered: 02 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 1badassmagnum:
THAT JERK IS MOST LIKELY DRIVING A NAVIGATOR AND TRYING TO KILL ME IN MY NISSAN SENTRA!

MAYBE WE SHOULD BAN NAVIGATORS! [Mad] [Mad] [Mad] [Mad]

We don't need to ban big firearms, Sentras, Navagators! What we need to ban is idiots, like Mr Tolly, walking the streets with sane people!

Now if you want a real wrist bender, I just happen to have an unfired TC Contender. with a 16.5" braked barrel chambered for 411 JDJ with scope and Iron sights, and a 10" bull barrel chambered for 223, also scoped, no irons,also has a hard case, and Nylon shoulder holster for long barrel scoped carry, if anyone is interested! The 411JDJ barrel is legal to use with rifle stock! [Cool]

[ 02-16-2003, 19:44: Message edited by: MacD37 ]
 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I just hope all of the hype about something big and new like the new S&W round and gun doesn't backfire like Black Talon did a few years ago. True- the Black Talon's weren't banned but from what I remember, there was a whole lot of bogus malarky stirred up by the press to have it banned or restricted since it was so "evil". I can see it now- new legislation to ban handguns over XX caliber. Oh well... Guess I'll stick with what I have.
 
Posts: 41 | Location: Kingsport, TN | Registered: 23 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Irony is now only police have black talons...
[Roll Eyes]
 
Posts: 1805 | Location: American Athens, Greece | Registered: 24 November 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    LATimes freaks out over .500 S&amp;W

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia