The Accurate Reloading Forums
Detachable Scope Mounts for Ruger RSM
01 October 2008, 03:59
massadDetachable Scope Mounts for Ruger RSM
I want to mount a Leupold scope on my Ruger and am wondering if anyone has any experience with detachable mounts for the Ruger?
Thanks in advance...Dr.Mike in Buffalo
01 October 2008, 04:14
GeronomoI have used the Warnes on my .416R RSM for ten years with complete satisfaction.
Geronimo
01 October 2008, 06:11
OldcoyoteThe standard Ruger rings are detachable.
.............................................
01 October 2008, 06:49
GarByHaving used the Warnes and one other set....forget which as it was a while back, I've gone back to the Ruger rings. At worst, they can be removed with a quarter...and work great.
Gary
DRSS
NRA Lifer
SCI
DSC
01 October 2008, 06:57
snowymthunterI have used the Warne detachable rings on my .416 RSM with a VX-III 1.5-5X scope with great success. The rings performed well on a pretty rough hunt in Tanzania in 2006. I have removed the scope a number of times and it seems to return to zero very well when re-attached. I had a local gunsmith mount the scope and rings for me to make sure they were set up "straight". Enjoy your RSM!
NRA Life Member
SCI Life Member
DRSS
01 October 2008, 08:23
rxgremlinI wonder if the Ruger rings would return to zero (or close to zero). GarBy, what didn't you like about the Warnes?
Jon
01 October 2008, 09:05
jstevensThe Ruger rings will return to zero, if you shove forward on them and alternate from front to rear while tightening them.
A shot not taken is always a miss
01 October 2008, 10:01
srshooterquote:
Originally posted by jstevens:
The Ruger rings will return to zero, if you shove forward on them and alternate from front to rear while tightening them.
That's how it's done! Put the scope/rings on, barely snug the screws so it has minimal play but can still be moved when forced, push the rings as forward as the'll go, then finish tightening each screw a little at a time while keeping forward/downward pressure on the scope & rings until you're finished.
I've had great repeatability in all my Ruger rifles and my .454 Ruger SRH when using this method. It's a very good system.
01 October 2008, 16:37
GarByJon:
The "pins"...or whatever you call them that fit into the Ruger grooves were'nt exactly matched up...there was a touch of slop. And...like stated for the Ruger rings, you must alternately tighten them...not an issue, but the Rugers work fine....with no protruding levers, etc.
I just didn't feel the benefit was there over thr factory rings. Plus, you can crank them pretty tight with a quarter.
Gary
DRSS
NRA Lifer
SCI
DSC
01 October 2008, 18:23
massadThank you gentleman. I am working on this project piecemeal as I can afford it. I am ordering my Leupold 1.5 x 5 soon and am replacing the pad with a limbsaver I believe. I love this rifle, the wood is great, it's accurate and it feeds everything well. Oh I also replaced the front bead with a NECG white one. Thanx again guys. Mike
01 October 2008, 21:21
kreytenI put warne QD rings on my Ruger 375 Alaskan...they work great. They return to zero after detachment.
Good luck.
01 October 2008, 21:43
KimRWhat ever happened to the chap on one of these threads who was supposed to make QD levers for Ruger rings?
02 October 2008, 00:31
AtkinsonIf you mark the position of our Ruger rings with a dab of white paint or whatever, and return them to that same spot, they will usually return to zero very well..Our camp gun returns to exact POI every time..I took a little 3 corner file and marked the position.
Be sure an test your particular rifle for this as rifles are like a woman, all of them are different!

Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120
rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com