Saeed has pretty much proved anything in the world can be taken with a 375. I'm wondering if there are any compelling arguments for a larger caliber rifle, then a 375?
I like the 400 grain bullet weight of the 416, but don't like the double the price for ammo of the 375.
The 458 is supposed to lack penetration?
I've always liked 45 caliber in hand guns, and, at 1200 fps, a 345-360 grain bullet has plenty. How does it change, when it's a 458 win?
I guess I'm looking for a rifle I can shoot bunches, but that the ammo is cheap for, and is very accurate, and, the cost of the rifle won't break the bank.
Currently, I have a line on a 375 CZ 550 for 550, new.
Any suggestions?
gs
Personally, I skipped the .375 and went from a .338 to a .416 for my African guns. I like the better performance of the 400gr bullet.
At the end of the day, Nick is right the .375 for a one gun solution is a difficult to beat. Buy it, shoot it, and then start looking for a .458 Lott or .450 Dakota.
I also believe you should get the 375. I have used mine for all types of animals and am wonderfully pleased. I then had a 450 Ackley built on the same action using the same stock as my 375.
Mike
Bigger is not better, but shop placement is the key. And if you hunt Africa, your PH will have the stopping rifle in his hands.
You need a rifle that you can consisitently shoot accurately offhand. Not from a bench or rest. And you must have a rifle that you can withstand the recoil and properly recover for a second shot.
Jesse
[This message has been edited by George Hoffman (edited 12-30-2001).]
Is there really a problem with the 458 not having enough penetration? It looks like with decent bullets, and moderate velocity, it should be just fine.
If my pistol, with a 345 grain hard cast bullet at 1550 fps, will go through 38 inches of buffalo, what's wrong with the 458?
Can you download the Rigby, and 458, reduce recoil, and still end up with better penetration then the 375?
a 416, 400 grain, at 2100 fps shouldn't kill the shooter, but it should punch a very nice hole in most anything?
Just so you don't think I'm making this up, I bought the sister gun of the one in the picture.
http://www.sixgunner.com/linebaugh/page3.htm
I, however, am no Ross Seyfried, either in my experience in Africa, which is none, or my shooting ability, which in this communist state, is a skill difficult to develop.
Anyway, do the 416 and 458 have reduced loads that are sufficent for anything, but buffalo, yet still don't break your collar bone?
gs
Please check this link:
http://www.riflemagazine.com/magazine/article.cfm?tocid=356&id=26
The article is by Ross Seyfried from Handloader Aug/Sep 2000, "Handguns, Rifles, Power and the Theory of Relativity".
It discusses the hand gun .45 bullets versus rifle results. It is a great reference.
I would urge you to try the .375 H&H first. Riflemaster John Gannaway says "The .375 is like a pair of black shoes, everybody needs one". I have three .375s now, 2 .375 H&H and 1 .376 Steyr. But one of the .375s is about to go to a gunsmith and be reborn as a .465 H&H (well, that is this week's plan ) That rifle is a BRNO 602, which is now being sold by Chay Zed as the CZ 550 Magnum Lux.
I buy at least one 550 .416 Rigby every year for our SCI Chapter fund raiser in San Diego, but I also get more .375s on the big bore side.
jim dodd
San Diego
George Hoffman who posted above developed the .416 Hoffman and collaborated with Remington on their flavor of .416. He had tons of Africa experience with that rifle, and you can take his reports to the bank. I remember one day finding an ad in Shotgun News for .416 Remington brass -- this was before the cartridge had been introduced. I called the number and found myself talking to George H. who was embarrased that the paper had run the ad early. We had a chat about his cartridge and the Remington version. Anyway I went down to the Remington dealer and ordered a .416 Remington that day.
------------------
"if you are to busy to
hunt, you are too busy."
http://www.african-hunter.com/site/firearms/solidsvmono_01.htm
The 458Win is fun
PerN
[This message has been edited by PerN (edited 12-25-2001).]
[This message has been edited by PerN (edited 12-30-2001).]
OK:
Ross says the long bullet, something I thought would help accuracy, and penetration, in a 458, at low velocity, causes instability, and therefore won't penetrate as expected.
So, for the 458 you want a 25-26 inch barrel, and hotter loads? Sounds like tons of recoil...
Could you take the 458, use a lighter, shorter, 400 grain slug, and get higher velocity, and more bullet stability?
On the otherhand, you have two people saying the long, narrow, 375 is the best penetrator of all? Using a 300 grain bullet, at high velocity?
We also have two professional hunters, one mauled by a cape buff, the other by a lion,
arguing that the 375, that failed to stop those animials, is still adequate?
Another, who unhappy with the two rounds in the 458, designed his own damn caliber, and is posting here?
A SERIOUS earfull.
OK: Let's here about the remington 416.
Does CZ make a rifle for that caliber, or who does,and what do they cost? Hows ammunition, compared to the 375, and 416 Rigby?
I still wonder if the magic 400 grain slug, in a 458,at good velocity, out of a 25-6inch barrel might not be a good penetrator, but, considering the people commenting here, and their experience, I'm sure there is a reason the Remington 416 is the rifle of choice, and I guess, the magazine capacity is one big reasons.
Thanks all for taking the time to comment, and,
Merry Christmas
gs
Are his prices on ammo correct? 200 dollars for a speer tungsten cored solid?
I've got to do a bit of checking on that...
gs
HMMM. Those south african solids look better every day.
gs
Let us know where you are (meaning updating your profile with a location) and someone just might offer to loan a rifle to you to shoot. Heck, If you are near me you can help with sight regulation.
"From the Beautiful Olympic Peninsula of Washington State"
Old Gun Builder's quote: "Don't Believe What You Think!"
[This message has been edited by John Ricks (edited 12-26-2001).]
gs
Bullet: Sectional Density:
.375/300 0.305
.416/400 0.330
.458/500 0.340
.458/400 0.272
I'm given to understand that 1) penetration is higher with bullets of higher sectional density, 2) 400 grain 45 caliber bullets are mostly designed to perform well at 45/70 velocities, not in the .458 WM.
H.C.
gs
IMHO, most anyone can handle a 375 H&H, the 416's are too much for some, but I'd so on average, anyone who wants to shoot one can. The 45's are difficult guns to master, and are too much for most folks. To shoot the 45's you must have the desire to master the gun, as well as the selfcontrol not to keep shooting when the gun is too much for you. If I hadn't had a strong desire to handle the 458 lott, I wouldn't have, and I still have the utmost respect for the round, and the fact that some days, it wins, and I come home with loaded ammo.
If you want to go with the 416, and there are plenty of good reasons to do so, my advice is you invest in a custom stock (good advice for any gun, especially DGR's). A good custom stock will greatly aid the shootability of the gun, and reduce fealt recoil to manageable levels. I also highly, highly recomend a past recoil pad for rangework. The past pad eliminates bruising.
I'll have to re-post my thread on dealing with recoil.
Many folks dislike the CZ stock, and while I agree aesthetically it is lacking, when I brought the gun to my shoulder eyes closed, then opened my eyes, the sights were right where they needed to be.
Now, if you want a 416 Rem mag, I'd consider getting a CZ-550 magnum action (~$500), and have a barrel (~$400-500) and stock ($200-500)fit finish($100) and irons ($100-200). You'll have an outstanding custom rifle in the $1200-1500 range.
Regards PC
------------------
The 2-3 cartridge capacity is something that concerns me.
I also like the idea of being able of putting
5 shots into anything large enough to gore me.
gs