The Accurate Reloading Forums
450 Rigby vs 450 Dakota
21 September 2008, 19:13
Hugh W450 Rigby vs 450 Dakota
Realizing these rounds are both based on the 416 Rigby case; I was wondering what the relative merits would be for each round?
Does one rate as the better round or are they both completely interchangeable?
Availability of head stamped brass, cost, recoil, etc.
Any significant difference?
21 September 2008, 22:39
RIPHave you tried the search function?
This has been beaten to death here.

21 September 2008, 22:46
Dave BushHugh:
I am going to order a .450 Dakota from AHR in the next couple of weeks. You are correct, the cartridges are very similar. However, I think the brass situation is better with the Dakota. I have talked to the people at Dakota and they told me they have about a years supply of .450 brass and that, in the future, Hornaday will be making brass for them. I found it pretty easy to pick up two hundred rounds of .450 Dakota brass. The stuff I have may have been made by Jamison but it looks pretty good. You can get brass for the .450 Rigby from Horneber and Jamison. The Horneber brass is good but pretty expensive and I have found Jamison brass to hit and miss from a quality standpoint.
Dave
Dave
DRSS
Chapuis 9.3X74
Chapuis "Jungle" .375 FL
Krieghoff 500/.416 NE
Krieghoff 500 NE
"Git as close as y can laddie an then git ten yards closer"
"If the biggest, baddest animals on the planet are on the menu, and you'd rather pay a taxidermist than a mortician, consider the 500 NE as the last word in life insurance." Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (8th Edition).
21 September 2008, 22:54
RIPReview all the talk and listing of spec differences via the search funtion.
Of the two, which do I prefer?
Same as Dave:
450 DAKOTA22 September 2008, 00:18
Hugh WRIP,
Thanks, after posting the question I did execute a search. Sorry. Pretty well covered.
I did not see much in terms of recoil comparisons. I know either load is going to be serious in terms of recoil. Any thoughts from somebody that has shot both?
Thanks,
Hugh
22 September 2008, 02:22
RIPSame Whump and Whomp on both ends of the two.
There is no other physical result perceptible to a human shooter or bio-target.

22 September 2008, 02:40
Dave BushIt's official. I guess we are not allowed to talk about the .450 Rigby/Dakota anymore because we have already discussed it. Just do a search.
This is going to be a big problem if we can't talk about stuff we have already talked about. We are not going to have much to say.
Dave
Dave
DRSS
Chapuis 9.3X74
Chapuis "Jungle" .375 FL
Krieghoff 500/.416 NE
Krieghoff 500 NE
"Git as close as y can laddie an then git ten yards closer"
"If the biggest, baddest animals on the planet are on the menu, and you'd rather pay a taxidermist than a mortician, consider the 500 NE as the last word in life insurance." Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (8th Edition).
22 September 2008, 04:24
RIPDave,
I see you are directing your latest post at me.
Since when were you given authority to make it official?
Feel free to ignore my boredom with same old same old.
Those who have not discussed this umpteen dozen times in the past please feel free to chip in.
How many times have I posted about the 450 Rigby vs. 450 Dakota, the great fly poop vs. pepper debate?
DO A SEARCH!