THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Real life advantage for controlled feed rifle?
Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Real life advantage for controlled feed rifle? Login/Join
 
one of us
posted Hide Post
cutting a mauser extractor so that you can drop a loaded round directly into the chamber is a poor practice IMO for a number of reasons not to mention it weakens the extractor, and its just as fast to push one down in the magazine, you have to close the bolt anyway so why fix a non existent problem...Ive seen more fumbles from folks trying to drop a round in an open bolt hole (chamber) than any other fungu..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42410 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
RIP and others, any comments on the old New Haven Winchester CRPF bolt:

 
Posts: 264 | Registered: 17 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sjmci:
... comments on the old New Haven Winchester CRPF bolt:


Minuses:
No BBSSCEx (Big Beautiful Spring Steel Claw Extractor) and
no TUTEx (True Undercut Tongue Extractor)
for use in the feeding and extraction phases.
This is much like Sako 75 feeding and extraction.

Pluses:
The MFCEjBS (Massive Fixed Controlled Ejector Bolt Stop) is excellent.
No TPUEj (Tiny Plunger Uncontrolled Ejector) to clutter the bolt face.

(I am refining my acronyms here for clarity:
Preveious BBC is now BBSSCEx.
Previuos TUT is now TUTEx.
Previous MF is now MFCEjBS.
Previuos TP is now TPUEj,
All as defined above.)

Of the five phases of operation, LFFEE (Load, Feed, Fire, Extract, Eject),
we are concerned only with these three functionalities:
FEE (Feeding, Extraction, Ejection)

Feeding: Semi-controlled Round Feed plus Push Feed (SRF+PF)
Extraction: Uncontrolled Round Extraction (UREx)
Ejection: Controlled Round Ejection (CREj)

To summarize, the old New Haven Winchester CRPF bolt action may be described as:
1. SRF+PF
2. UREx
3. CREj
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nakihunter:
The problem I faced is when I tried to eject carefully to keep down noise. That is when I have had jams in the field - once with a push feed 243 in Mod 700 Remington and another with CRF Kimber in 7mm08.

The same issue happens in the range when trying to save the brass carefully.


I kept this article from G&A by Ross S. called A Professional's Rifle. Not all the info in it stands up, but what it really is, is a rundown on what your bolt rifle has to do to qualify. One of the drills is slow feeding, and fast feeding. According to him either is a common problem, not an attribute of either action type, and if your rifle has either problem it needs work.

Interestingly, his favourite .416 is a push feed Rem, just because it was great. But I don't get that, and it almost seemed like malpractice as a pro.
 
Posts: 19 | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BuffHunter63:
Not for me personally, but a PH I hunted ellie with told me that two months earlier he had a misfire on a charging cow elephant. He turned to run (the ellie was within 20 feet of him) and the ellie got a tusk under his cartridge belt and lifted him off the ground.

The belt broke and he tumbled down between the front legs of the ellie whom was trying to smash him.

Lying on his back he managed to chamber another round and fire straight up into the underside of the elephant's chin, killing the elephant immediately with a brain shot!

Fortunately the elephant collapsed on her knees and did not crush him.

Would he have survived without CRF? My guess is no.

BH63



This!! This is exactly the scenario that occurs to me, out of position shooting. Of course this is a far more exciting example, but any stumble that puts you on your ass, or even rolling to a more efficient position to work on a hiccup, could put you in a position where the rifle doesn't work as well without CF.
 
Posts: 19 | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I agree with those who have asked when does push feed ever work better? I can't see a scenario, other than in pseudo-sniping, were a target rifle of sorts, may be preferred. Even there, there are some very accurate guns set up on Mauser actions, and with CNC a lot of different choices we didn't used to have when the tube actions were so much easier to set up in a lathe for tuing.

On the flip side has there ever been a battle rifle of note, in a bolt, that was not CF?
 
Posts: 19 | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Gustavo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:

(I am refining my acronyms here for clarity:
Preveious BBC is now BBSSCEx.
Previuos TUT is now TUTEx.
Previous MF is now MFCEjBS.
Previuos TP is now TPUEj,
All as defined above.)


Rip ...


Ron, I hope there is more refining coming down...we will certainly need an auto-bot to translate this new gun parlance. animal nilly

What is "clarity" if not a simple concept for those not initiated yet?

You are one off and a cut above the rest of us mere mortals! tu2


------------------------------------------------------------------------
ColdBore 1.0 - the ballistics/reloading software solution
http://www.patagoniaballistics.com
 
Posts: 753 | Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina | Registered: 14 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The only time I have had a bolt action rifle fail was with a M700 Remington, that failed in the same manner as D'arcy Echols wrote previously, except mine did not tear off the rim. Since then I have hunted in Saskatchewan's severe winter weather with Mausers, Rugers, and Sakos with no further problems. Remington are junk, failure to fire or extract is only one of a long list of problems. It is no surprise that the company is bankrupt.
 
Posts: 242 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 24 January 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jorge
posted Hide Post
quote:
Paul Mauser designed his bolt not so much for controlled feed but for controlled extraction The controlled feed was a function of the primary purpose of controlled extraction.


There it is. That, and quotes from Phil and D'Arcy pretty much covers it. and I'll add the 700 was/is the biggest scam perpetrated on an ignorant public since the Yugo...


USN (ret)
DRSS Verney-Carron 450NE
Cogswell & Harrison 375 Fl NE
Sabatti Big Five 375 FL Magnum NE
DSC Life Member
NRA Life Member

 
Posts: 7154 | Location: Orange Park, Florida. USA | Registered: 22 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of juanpozzi
posted Hide Post
Many times i saw ,push feeds failures ,most ofthem after firing and the case is stucked inside the chamber ,i never saw it during my hunts because 90 percent of the clients use cf ,doubles or one of my cf rifles .
I teach practical shooting in my farm and gun club and believe me i saw many pf failures ,last time a tikka and a howa but i saw it virtually in any pf .We organize sra -shooting matches that to put it simple its practica shooting with rifle there i saw many failures too.
Please read RIFA RIFA proficiency examination by my good friend th late Don Heath .
Regards Juan


www.huntinginargentina.com.ar FULL PROFESSIONAL MEMBER OF IPHA INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASOCIATION .
DSC PROFESSIONAL MEMBER
DRSS--SCI
NRA
IDPA
IPSC-FAT -argentine shooting federation cred number2-
 
Posts: 6382 | Location: Cordoba argentina | Registered: 26 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of juanpozzi
posted Hide Post
Caylen Wojcik even use cfs in his long range SAD .
Caylen ex usmc recon sniper is one ofthe best rifle instructores in america currently at www.magpullcore.com staff


www.huntinginargentina.com.ar FULL PROFESSIONAL MEMBER OF IPHA INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASOCIATION .
DSC PROFESSIONAL MEMBER
DRSS--SCI
NRA
IDPA
IPSC-FAT -argentine shooting federation cred number2-
 
Posts: 6382 | Location: Cordoba argentina | Registered: 26 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Gustavo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by juanpozzi:
Caylen Wojcik even use cfs in his long range SAD .
Caylen ex usmc recon sniper is one ofthe best rifle instructores in america currently at www.magpullcore.com staff


Juan, what you've seen on Caylen rig is the Mausingfield action, which is a nice design no questions asked. Good stuff for sure.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
ColdBore 1.0 - the ballistics/reloading software solution
http://www.patagoniaballistics.com
 
Posts: 753 | Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina | Registered: 14 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Bottom line? Anybody that would argue with Paul Mauser would have to be a candidate for a white jacket, and they are many! old


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42410 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Gustavo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
Bottom line? Anybody that would argue with Paul Mauser would have to be a candidate for a white jacket, and they are many! old


tu2 Eeker


------------------------------------------------------------------------
ColdBore 1.0 - the ballistics/reloading software solution
http://www.patagoniaballistics.com
 
Posts: 753 | Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina | Registered: 14 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've trained with Caylen Wojcik a couple times and agree--he is the best precision/hunting rifle instructor I've met, and I've trained with quite a few. He is not with Magpul any longer.

Caylen is the training director for Gunwerks in Wyoming now: https://www.gunwerks.com/store/training

He also teaches independently through his firm Kalinski Consulting: http://kalinski.flywheelsites.com/

quote:
Originally posted by juanpozzi:
Caylen Wojcik even use cfs in his long range SAD .
Caylen ex usmc recon sniper is one ofthe best rifle instructores in america currently at www.magpullcore.com staff
 
Posts: 118 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 07 October 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Thom

* * *
I kept this article from G&A by Ross S. called A Professional's Rifle. Not all the info in it stands up, but what it really is, is a rundown on what your bolt rifle has to do to qualify. One of the drills is slow feeding, and fast feeding. According to him either is a common problem, not an attribute of either action type, and if your rifle has either problem it needs work.

Interestingly, his favourite .416 is a push feed Rem, just because it was great. But I don't get that, and it almost seemed like malpractice as a pro.


Ross Siegfried is a known gun-rag blowhard who'll say one thing in an article in a particular magazine, and then contradict himself in another magazine by stating exactly the opposite on the same topic. Roll Eyes

His chief objective appears to be to get published as much as possible without necessarily satisfying the corresponding need to make consistent sense on a particular topic.

popcorn


All The Best ...
 
Posts: 813 | Location: Texas | Registered: 15 October 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cold Trigger Finger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DArcy_Echols_Co:
I have witnessed a few failures with both CRF and PF rifles in the field. Very few of these failures could be directly related to either system rather they were caused by operator error. In every instance but the one stated below I was looking through the binocs or the spotting scope and wasn't aware of how the wheels began falling off but rapidly became aware of the train wreck as the animal in front of me was sometimes waving goodbye usually with a back shoulder swinging like a pendulum. I can say clearing all of those jams took very little time to correct but did create some momentary drama.

I was personally hunting in Saskatchewan one year with a 700. We were doing some drives that required getting in and out of the guides truck which had an internal heat bloom of a south pacific island. It had snowed heavily the night before and every bush and tree was covered with snow and the outside temp was now in the teens. To comply with the laws all guns had to be cased while in the truck going from one block of trees to the next to set up a drive. My rifle was covered with condensation the second time it was pulled from the case and as I walked towards where I was supposed to take a stand snow fell from the branches all around me and on the rifle. At the place I was supposed to block I pulled my handkerchief from a pocket to wipe off as much as the now freezing moisture as I could. You can say all you want to about how this could have been prevented but trust me at the time I could not think of a thing, in retro spec a bore snake would have saved my bacon that day. As soon as the drivers came through we saddled up in the truck again. Frozen rifles now being slid back into wet warm cases, just great.

On the 4th and very last push of that day a heavy horned mature buck came plowing through the snow out of a wood lot doing his best to escape the scene. As he ran directly towards me I eased off the safety and raised the rifle to port of arms. This was going to a locker shot I said to myself, at perhaps 30 yards he saw me raise the rifle to my shoulder and veered just slightly before he really poured on the coal. Even today I can still see the flying snow whenever he landed and coiled up for another jump. The duplex shown black and bold on the leading edge of his shoulder as I pressed the trigger.

The rifle never went off, without any hesitation I tried to eject that round thinking I had a dud. The bolt wouldn't move and the buck disappeared into the willow swamp behind me. Puzzled would be a good way to described how I felt at that moment.

It took a couple of very hard blows on the underside of bolt handle to finally get the boot to rotate out of battery and I can remember seeing ice fall out of the front ring as I hammered on the bolt handle. I gave the bolt one last heavy bump to the rear to try and clear the chamber and the extractor tore through the case rim. Out came the bolt but the 7mm mag round was still stuck solid in the chamber.

The guide that had jumped and followed the buck arrived on the scene with a "what the fuck" look on his face when he saw where the buck had changed course. The walk back to the truck was a quite one. A couple times he murmured "sure looked big from an ass end view ". The other guide and hunter listened to my tale of whoa as I dug my flashlight out of my kit in the truck. I could not see dimple on the stuck case from the firing pin so even the firing pin had frozen solid within the bolt. I was pretty sure the round was as safe as it could be at that time. We didn't have a cleaning rod with us and the guide was afraid if we cased the rifle with the loaded round still in the chamber he could be cited by the DNR if we got stopped. We were a long way from the paved road so I sat up front with the muzzle point towards the ceiling and the breech area as close to the heater vent as I could get it. About 10 miles down the round I heard the now unfrozen round hit the rear of the action and then felt it bounce off my boot. We stopped the rig and I cased the 700. Later on the evening I pulled the barreled action out of the stock and the bole sleeve and firing pin assembly out of the bolt body. Everything was completely water logged.

I kept that loaded round for years. A perfect grove was pulled through the case rim. Would this have happened with a claw extractor I'm not at all sure but I do not think so do to the greater surface area covered by the claw extractor. This was a unique situation under a set of very unique environmental circumstances.

Anything can fail but I never gone into the field on a serious big game hunt with another 700, once bitten twice shy.



I have seen this happen many times with push feed rifles. A friend of mine is a Model 700 guy. He does great with them. He is fond of saying , A model 700 extractor will pull the rim off a case , it's so strong !
Unfortunately, what he doesn't understand is that any rotating extractor doesn't ( Pull the Rim Off The Case) rather it slices thru the brass rim to the point it is weak enough that the small amount of brass remaining attached to the back of the case tears off!
Then there is the already mention brass shavings getting into all kinds of places it shouldn't and messing up the works. Another problem with push feed bolt faces is they love to collect moisture, , like a funnel. Those Great 3 rings of Steel ;-). I've seen the bolt faces packed so tight with fine wind blown snow dust from a snow machine ride when caribou hunting . That the bolt had to be pulled from the receiver and a knife point had to be used to chip the ice out . No easy task getting the bolt out of a M700 with their tiny little lever inside the trigger guard. And of course while all this is going on the caribou decide to get the he'll out a Dodge! I've only had a few push feed rifles that didn't chamber reliably . 1 a 308 in a 722. The hands down WORST FEEDING RIFLE I EVER HAD THE SORRY MISFORTUNE TO OWN !!!!! Was a M700 in 223 !! There ain't enough cuss words in the American language to articulate trying to get a round in the chamber of that rifle.
2, 788 Rems in 223 I had fed 100% or close to it . The 527 CZ that I had fed 100% . The Savage Edge in 223 I had fed absolutely 100% . That and the fact it was the single most accurate rifle I've ever seen let alone owned and shot. And it only cost $269.00 . But that's a different subject. I still sent that rifle down the road. Rotating extractors and plunger ejectors fail, they fail repeatedly and quite miserably.
I know that most people live and hunt in much more moderate climates and situations than the bush Alaskans do. If you've ever seen a Super Cub with a Koplin Gun Boot lashed to a wing strut . You kinda know what your rifle will have to endure, just to get to where the hunting Starts. And that's nice compared to being hung on the towing post of my heavy welded Aluminum work boats . And pounding 50 miles of salt water to go to work , fish, or hunt. In November thru February.


Phil Shoemaker : "I went to a .30-06 on a fine old Mauser action. That worked successfully for a few years until a wounded, vindictive brown bear taught me that precise bullet placement is not always possible in thick alders, at spitting distances and when time is measured in split seconds. Lucky to come out of that lesson alive, I decided to look for a more suitable rifle."
 
Posts: 1934 | Location: Eastern Central Alaska | Registered: 15 July 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cold Trigger Finger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Thom Dl:
I agree with those who have asked when does push feed ever work better? I can't see a scenario, other than in pseudo-sniping, were a target rifle of sorts, may be preferred. Even there, there are some very accurate guns set up on Mauser actions, and with CNC a lot of different choices we didn't used to have when the tube actions were so much easier to set up in a lathe for tuing.

On the flip side has there ever been a battle rifle of note, in a bolt, that was not CF?



This brings up the whole, push feed positive feed back comments. Prone or bench shooters that don't want to change their position to chamber a fresh round. And the reason for the 60- 70 ° bolt lift of many target actions. Guys just want to swat the bolt closed. Something of a slothful bolt manipulation. Imho the reason Ted invented the Nucleus action. Which is CRF , but has a rotating extractor . It is a VERY Robust extractor tho . It can not but pulled off the bolt , broke or become dislodged. And the Nucleus action has a fixed ejector.
Watching American Rifle Co. You tube vids is quite an education ! And very entertaining !


Phil Shoemaker : "I went to a .30-06 on a fine old Mauser action. That worked successfully for a few years until a wounded, vindictive brown bear taught me that precise bullet placement is not always possible in thick alders, at spitting distances and when time is measured in split seconds. Lucky to come out of that lesson alive, I decided to look for a more suitable rifle."
 
Posts: 1934 | Location: Eastern Central Alaska | Registered: 15 July 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Slider
posted Hide Post
I have both and have never had an issue with either type.
 
Posts: 2694 | Location: East Wenatchee | Registered: 18 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Heym SR20:
Thanks for the comments reLeft hand controlled round feed actions. Challenge is that I am in the UK. And the few companies that import rifles don’t bother with left handed stuff - there is no market you understand. Doing one off imports from US is a nonstarter given the cost of US Export licences.
Zastava Arms, which manufactures the left-handed M70 (true mirror action of the commercial FN M98 H-ring action union which the M70 action is based), is located in Serbia. No need for USA importer/exporter involvement.


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Huh? popcorn


All The Best ...
 
Posts: 813 | Location: Texas | Registered: 15 October 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by A.J. Hydell:
Huh? popcorn


Reading comprehension --
try it sometime

HeymSR20 is located in Scotland
Zastava is in Serbia

Hence
No need to involve a US importer


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4595 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In a war, thank you very much, I take a supposed push feed Lee Enfield over a CRF Mauser '98 any day. And so would most here, with any sense in them, too.

There's more to a good rifle than CRF or push feed in the medium calibres.

Mauser's bolt is 90 degree, over long and the bolt root obscures the firers view of the target. Lee's bolt is 60 degree, shorter and the bolt root doesn't obscure the firer's view of the target.

In 1945 an American politician, seeking to belittle him, once asked British Prime Minister Clement Attlee if he'd ever hunted or shot dangerous game.

"Yes," replied Attlee, "Germans. And you?"
 
Posts: 6824 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had a Browning BLR81 the extraktor frose open twice in 8y of use in wintertime.It didnt destroy a hunt it was just a small inconvenience. Solution degreasing never using any lubricant who can jam up the action. I sold it and bought a Tikka T3 instead it has not controled feed but it works perfect in any conditions easyer to clean.
 
Posts: 3611 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 02 May 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
"There's more to a good rifle than CRF or push feed in the medium calibres."

Military automatic rifles are push feed they never complain about it. Yes i have had failure to reload with HK G3, FNC then i dipped them in snow Smiler
 
Posts: 3611 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 02 May 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ross S is not a blow hard, he is a very professional gun nut, and one of the best hunters I know of...He was a PH in Africa for 11 years and managed his elk ranch for years. He has a gun background second to none. He is in fact a super nice person..If he contradicted himself it was because he changed his mind and admitted it.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42410 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The merits and reason for the CRF is largely historical and hails from a era of transition from unreliable ammunition , rifles and methods of warfare that hopefully we will never ever see again.

The success of Mauser's then revolutionary design was not lost on hunters who transitioned at the same time that guns were put to the test on the battlefields of Europe.

The Mauser 98 system and it was a system of features was revolutionary given what available before. Front locking vs rear locking on the bolt, Positive controlled extraction of a damaged case which was often the result of a case rupture and protection via gas diversion for the shooter in the event of a rupture. It was not so much a controlled feed that was at issue it was controlled extraction !

The transition from BP to nitro was a stormy affair and pressure was as it still is a difficult force to master and control. The issue of "tropical loads" and ammunition very much part of the pressure control issue. Unreliable ammo and unreliable guns were very much part of a era gone by.

Today much if not the majority of failure issues are gone ! We simply do not see catastrophic case failures on factory ammo and thus what was very much part of the transition era of why the old controlled feed and extraction was essential no longer exists..... yes like many before deem this essential to the DG hunting rifle ( as I do) it is mostly a mindset issue .

I will wager a bet that most DG rifles built today will at most see use in a single safari done under watchful eye of hopefully a competent shooter as guide ( this is a topic on its own sofa ) for the most they will never ever be used for what they were built for and most will at most not see a 100 odd rounds fired in a lifetime !
 
Posts: 7857 | Registered: 16 August 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of A7Dave
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
Ross S is not a blow hard, he is a very professional gun nut, and one of the best hunters I know of...He was a PH in Africa for 11 years and managed his elk ranch for years. He has a gun background second to none. He is in fact a super nice person..If he contradicted himself it was because he changed his mind and admitted it.


Is he still writing? Always enjoyed his articles, but I don't get the Double Gun Journal anymore.


Dave
 
Posts: 928 | Location: AKexpat | Registered: 27 October 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 458Win
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
Ross S is not a blow hard, he is a very professional gun nut, and one of the best hunters I know of...He was a PH in Africa for 11 years and managed his elk ranch for years. He has a gun background second to none. He is in fact a super nice person..If he contradicted himself it was because he changed his mind and admitted it.


Ross has many talents and did obtain a PH license in Zambia and according to what he wrote, worked part time for three or four seasons. But there are a fair number of folks who actually have had dealings with Ross and who have differing feelings about the matter.


Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship
Phil Shoemaker
Alaska Master guide
FAA Master pilot
NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com
 
Posts: 4226 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Skyline
posted Hide Post
I have not seen anything current from Ross for a long time. Is he even still writing?


______________________________________________

The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who are bereft of that gift.



 
Posts: 1882 | Location: Northern Rockies, BC | Registered: 21 July 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Real life advantage for controlled feed rifle?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia