THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
350gr .375 cal TSX Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Gatehouse
posted
So it's been out for awhile, what are your experiences with this bullet? Work any better than the 300gr TSX?


375 Ruger- The NEW KING of the .375's!!
 
Posts: 3082 | Location: Pemberton BC Canada | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of gumboot458
posted Hide Post
I had No idea . This should be interesting .

My ? is Why ?
Does the 300 gr X of TSX lack penetration .
I think the 350 gr is a good weight in the 416 +458 .
Well I guess the 458 finally beats the 375 H&H in velocity.


.If it can,t be grown , its gotta be mined ....
 
Posts: 3445 | Location: Copper River Valley , Prudhoe Bay , and other interesting locales | Registered: 19 November 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Blacktailer
posted Hide Post
Have no experience with them but have used 350gr Woodleighs and 300gr TSX. My concern with my 375H&H would be the length of the 350gr TSX. Since the Woody's are lead core, they are actually shorter than the 300gr Barnes but the 350gr Barnes MAY run into powder capacity or stability issues in the H&H sized case because of their length. I would think the 350 TSX would be more useful in a RUM or WBY sized case. For an H&H or Ruger I would stick with the 300gr Barnes Wink


Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 3831 | Location: Cave Creek, AZ | Registered: 09 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Gatehouse
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gumboot458:
I had No idea . This should be interesting .

My ? is Why ?
Does the 300 gr X of TSX lack penetration .
.


My question as well. But they've been out for awhile, I was wondering if anyone has tried them yet.


375 Ruger- The NEW KING of the .375's!!
 
Posts: 3082 | Location: Pemberton BC Canada | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I guess that a 1-12" std 375 twistrate is marginal for a 350 TSX. Just a feeling though..
I think there is no need for a 350 grs TSX, the 300 grs will do everything an exp. 375 bullet is supposed to do..
 
Posts: 873 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I think there is no need for a 350 grs TSX, the 300 grs will do everything an exp. 375 bullet is supposed to do..


Agreed, and the 350 gr TSX is too long for my liking as it will have to be seated too deep into the case. I view the 350 gr TSX as a solution to a non existent problem.

Warrior
 
Posts: 2273 | Location: South of the Zambezi | Registered: 31 January 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of POP
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gatehouse:
So it's been out for awhile, what are your experiences with this bullet? Work any better than the 300gr TSX?


Have no idea but I do not find it interesting at all.

Now the new 375 250 TTSX That will rock!
So will the 416 cal 350 TTSX!


My blog: Please Comment and Follow
https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
 
Posts: 3865 | Location: Cheyenne, WYOMING, USA | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
I am sorry to see the monobullet makers appeal to the uninformed public rather than to experienced shooters. You cant have it both ways, a monometal and a heavier than ordinary bullet weight. North Fork is also going down this road.

The 350 grain 375 probably has a SD about like a 500 grain .458 doesnt it?

The 500 grain Barnes turns over 180 degrees and breaks off its X petals even when fired in a 1-12 rather than 1-14 twist and at 2400 instead of 2100 fps. Still not enough RV to keep it point forward.

One advantage I guess if it is one is that when it does turn over it will have quite alot of frontal area until it goes base forward again.

If yo want the heavy weights, I would stick with a conventional lead core bullet, whether it is FMJ or SP.

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Dave Bush
posted Hide Post
When I shoot a monometal bullet, I usually go lighter, not heavier. For example, in my Rigby, I shoot the 350 grain TSX and in my .450 Dakota, I shoot the 450 grain TSX. That is the advantage of the monometals. You can drop down in bullet weight and have a flatter shooting cartridge but still get great penetration. They are so long, I can't imagine going up in weight. I agree with Andy, if you want a heavier bullet, stick with bullets of conventional construction.


Dave
DRSS
Chapuis 9.3X74
Chapuis "Jungle" .375 FL
Krieghoff 500/.416 NE
Krieghoff 500 NE

"Git as close as y can laddie an then git ten yards closer"

"If the biggest, baddest animals on the planet are on the menu, and you'd rather pay a taxidermist than a mortician, consider the 500 NE as the last word in life insurance." Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (8th Edition).
 
Posts: 3728 | Location: Midwest | Registered: 26 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
I would rather have them make a 270 grain TTSX.


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13834 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia