If you had your choise wich one would you get blued or stainless
I was thinking about the stainless but got to thinking the stainless on that rifle is quite shiny and highly polished. I would think that I would be better off with a nice blued barrel and walnut stock.
so wich one would you choose.
Posts: 2095 | Location: B.C | Registered: 31 January 2002
I got a Ruger No. 1 458 Lott in stainless which I like a lot. It is just a matter of personal taste to choose between blue steel versus stainless steel. Some experts here will tell you that stainless will gall and such and such which is simply not entirely true. I have had many stainless firearms including some of the tightest tolerance guns ever made and have had zero galling problems with any of them. However, I don't believe that you can get a blue 458 Lott Ruger No. 1 from Ruger. Good luck.
[ 03-16-2003, 02:15: Message edited by: Mingo ]
Posts: 1002 | Location: Midwest USA | Registered: 01 September 2001
quote:Originally posted by black-powder-big-bore: thanks for the imput.
mingo do you think that the highly poilished finish on the number one would be a bad thing maybe scaring game?
i thought you could get a 458 lott number 1 in blued if not oh well then if i deside on blued ill have to find something else
No problems at all to hunt with a brigtly polished stainless gun. It depends on which region you hunt in, it is an advantage to hunt with a bright stainless gun in a snowy land.
Posts: 1002 | Location: Midwest USA | Registered: 01 September 2001
kinda like blending in with the glare off the snow
and another question i have very little exp with winchester guns but i was looking at there custom safarie grade guns would 1 in 458 lott be a good choise.