Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Hi all, another newbie question here. It seems that all the old doubles were exposed hammer guns, but most everthing new is hammerless. Is there any advantage of the hammers except for silent cocking? Are both equally reliable and sutible? Thanks. | ||
|
one of us |
quote:I much prefer shotguns with hammers, but for certain, they are slower to operate if you are hunting on the half cock. If you expect lots of warning before the shot, hammers are fine and can be cocked quietly, but in surprise encounters, they are slower. Some hammer configurations are faster than others, and a big thumb helps. Were I buying a double rifle, I would insist on hammers, but at the same time realizing they are generally a disadvantage. Brent | |||
|
one of us |
Lar45: Another advantage to hammers is that you can tell at a glance whether or not they are cocked. | |||
|
One of Us |
On a dangerous game hunt there are plenty of things that can go wrong. Not being able to cock the hammers fast enough, or walking around with hammers cocked and no safety seem to be unnecessary risks. | |||
|
one of us |
It took us a 100 years to get away from those hammers, and it suits me fine...but for those who have hammer nostalgia, then I say for it, it is all about fun and games... | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia