If you were going to have a Model 70 Classic Stainless .375 H&H re-stocked to a nice aftermarket "all-weather" stock....who would you choose?

I'm assuming McMillan will be highly recommended....who else? Maybe a laminated stock from Accurate Innovations?

My vote would go for the Accurate Innovations stock. I have been very pleased with their work.

Maurice

Before




And after the conversion

1. An Echols Legend in magnum fill for weight (D'Arcy's design made by McMillan).
2. A used Rimrock or Clifton if you can find one.

1) Bell & Carlson Winchester "Medalist" Long action: SKU# 7776 synthetic stock @ 1.85 pounds; similar to the current factory Winchester "Extreme Weather" Stock with the full length aluminum bedding block.
2) Echols Legend with Edge fill @ I think 1.75 pounds???

Another vote for the Echols stock with the magnum fill. I have used several of these and they are outstanding. The design is great and they manage recoil very well.

Is the Echols stock made out of fiberglass? Also, does it have any type of bedding/chassis system?

I would go with the McMilan, magnum fill in the McWoody color.

Here is a picture of mine, for my Holland's Super .30.

quote:

Originally posted by Eland Slayer:
Is the Echols stock made out of fiberglass? Also, does it have any type of bedding/chassis system?

The Echols is a McMillan stock made to D'Arcy's pattern. Other than the dimensions, its made like all other McMillans. I don't have a problem with chassis and blocks (i own a few) but they do nothing that a top flight synthetic can't do on its own with proper bedding.

I just had HCR put my 338 Classic in a Mcmillan that I ordered from D'Arcy. HCR has their own Mcmillan's to sell you. FAST turn around and good work. I've had another M70 classic 9.3 x 62 that's been at another smith's shop for over 18 months. Wish I had taken it to HCR.

McMillian would be my choice.

However, if you want a drop in stock several friends have had excellent results with the HS Precision stocks.

If you want to go light (20 oz) the Pendleton Stock will weigh at least 8 oz less up to 12 oz than a McMillan stock.

quote:

Originally posted by dirklawyer:
If you want to go light (20 oz) the Pendleton Stock will weigh at least 8 oz less up to 12 than a McMillan stock.

I actually prefer a heavier stock...

quote:

Originally posted by Eland Slayer:

quote:

Originally posted by dirklawyer:
If you want to go light (20 oz) the Pendleton Stock will weigh at least 8 oz less up to 12 than a McMillan stock.

I actually prefer a heavier stock...

Then the McMillan is the cadillac of stocks to go with for synthetic BUT if you want STRENGTH the laminate is the way to go.

Basically, I am looking for a stock that will be strong....but also able to withstand harsh weather (rain, snow, etc...) because I do plan to take this rifle to Alaska someday.

Do you guys feel that laminate is as good as synthetic for this purpose? I assume laminate is not susceptible to warping like standard wood is...

I have dragged mine through rain, snow, drizzle you name it. It has not warped yet...

The McMillan feels best to me. If at all possible you should check them out on a rifle to get the feel you like.

I bought a drop in HS precision sporter for a mod 70 338 that I took to Alaska. No waiting or bedding really required. And cheaper. But mcmillam is probably the best...(better recoil pad at least)

I put my classic stainless 375 in a Macmillan super grade. I couldn't be happier with this set up.

I'm not much of a composite stock fan, but I have to admit that I really liked the Pacific Research stock, purchased later by another company and they dubbed it the Rimrock as I recall. They really handled and pointed like a custom stock should..I don't believe they are still in business but I see a few around from time to time. I'd love to have one for my Mod. 70 pre 64...