THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Why are nickel jackets not common anymore?

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Why are nickel jackets not common anymore? Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I have a stupid question - why isn't nickel jacketing used large bore bullets anymore?

Seems to me I see a lot of references to nickel in older literature, and not now. What gives? bewildered
 
Posts: 5184 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 06 August 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
E-X-P-E-N-S-I-V-E and doesn't really perform any better than most copper alloy jackets. 715 CuNi weighs the same as traditional copper jacketing. Anything with a lead core's gonna be gone in a few years.
 
Posts: 13301 | Location: On the Couch with West Coast Cool | Registered: 20 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bent Fossdal
posted Hide Post
The nickel alloy used by Norma for their Alaska and Silverblixt was att least illeagal due to some toxic stuff in the alloy.


Bent Fossdal
Reiso
5685 Uggdal
Norway

 
Posts: 1707 | Location: Norway | Registered: 21 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
What toxic stuff ?? Where those Normas nickel jackets or the old Norma Tri-Clad ?
 
Posts: 7636 | Registered: 10 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mete:
What toxic stuff ?? Where those Normas nickel jackets or the old Norma Tri-Clad ?


CuproNickel is the alloy. It has just enough nickel in it to make it look silver. It is essentially the same alloy as "German silver".


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
From Corbins book:

Cupro-nickel alloys can be drawn into a bullet jacket but it is more difficult to draw than copper or steel. Jackets made with this alloy fouled the barrel excessively, leaving lumps and streaks of the jacket material down the barrel. The fouling was very difficult to remove. Cupronickel jackets look like steel jackets but a simple magnet test will tell if the jacket is steel or not. However some steel jacketed bullets also had a cupro-nickel coating so the magnet test is not always definitive.
Bullets made with cupro-nickel jackets were suspected of causing a number of rifles to blow up. The thinking was that the jacket material would bond to the cartridge case; on firing the case neck would be torn off, and a blown up barrel and/or rifle would result. But many of the cupro-nickel jackets were coated with tin. Tin has a strong affinity for brass. It is more likely that tin coating the bullets caused the bullets to bond to the cartridge case and that was the real cause of the problem.
Eventually the cupro-nickel era came to an end and shooters worldwide breathed a sigh of relief.
Steel was used and is used today for bullet jackets. It has the advantage of being low in cost, it can be drawn into a jacket without a great deal of effort, and when made properly makes a good hunting bullet. Steel jackets have found plenty of use in military bullets. But steel jackets do rust, which is not desirable, so they are usually plated or clad with gilding metal or nickel. At one time steel jackets were coated with cupro-nickel. Steel jacketed bullets are common in Europe where they are used without any problems. Steel jacketed bullets are said to cause more barrel wear but tests don’t bear this out. Barrel wear with steel jacketed bullets seems to be about the same as with other materials.
Perhaps this belief came about because of the use of reclaimed surplus military bullets that could be contaminated with grit or because some military bullets have much thicker, harder jackets than a hunting bullet would. Another possible reason is that barrel steels of the 1930 to late 1940 years were softer and would wear faster than modern barrels. There seems to be little reason not to use a well made steel jacketed bullet today but a bias against steel will not easily go away.


For more:http://rceco.com/img/RSBook6.PDF
 
Posts: 6935 | Location: hydesville, ca. , USA | Registered: 17 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Masterifleman
posted Hide Post
quote:
Jackets made with this alloy fouled the barrel excessively, leaving lumps and streaks of the jacket material down the barrel.

This same thing was believed to have caused the explosive demise of a few of the"low-numbered" Springfield 1903's. Earlier .30-06 ammo was loaded with cupro-nickel jaketed bullets. I still have a few of them headstamped 1916.


"I ask, sir, what is the Militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them" - George Mason, co-author of the Second Amendment during the Virginia convention to ratify the Constitution
 
Posts: 1699 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 14 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
You guys are mixing bullets. CN bullets were used in service all through the Spanish-American War and WW I where many millions were fired. Most other countries also used CN bullets. The US did not switch to GM (Gilding Metal) jackets until the early 1920s. Even then, there were still over 2 billion CN cartridges on hand and they continued to be used for non-combat purposes into the 1930s. CN did produce it's own brand of fouling but it was not that big a deal to clean it out.

There are no known blow ups of rifles from using CN bullets. The well-known blowups were mostly with the old hard and brittle receivers and had nothing to do with the bullets. Except - some accidents were traced to shooters coating the bullets with grease.

The 1921 "tin can" bullets were also blamed for some blow-ups but Gen Hatcher later found that they were not the cause. Besides, the tinned bulleted ammunition was withdrawn from service very soon after being issued and very few of them were ever fired. It was strictly a loading for the National Matches and was never intended for regular service.

Ray


Arizona Mountains
 
Posts: 1560 | Location: Arizona Mountains | Registered: 11 October 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cheechako:
You guys are mixing bullets. CN bullets were used in service all through the Spanish-American War and WW I where many millions were fired. Most other countries also used CN bullets. The US did not switch to GM (Gilding Metal) jackets until the early 1920s. Even then, there were still over 2 billion CN cartridges on hand and they continued to be used for non-combat purposes into the 1930s. CN did produce it's own brand of fouling but it was not that big a deal to clean it out.

There are no known blow ups of rifles from using CN bullets. The well-known blowups were mostly with the old hard and brittle receivers and had nothing to do with the bullets. Except - some accidents were traced to shooters coating the bullets with grease.

The 1921 "tin can" bullets were also blamed for some blow-ups but Gen Hatcher later found that they were not the cause. Besides, the tinned bulleted ammunition was withdrawn from service very soon after being issued and very few of them were ever fired. It was strictly a loading for the National Matches and was never intended for regular service.

Ray



Good post, Ray. It is amazing how confused history can get when it passes through numerous ears and mouths, isn't it.

The only part of your post I can even partly disagree slightly with is how easy it is to remove nickel fouling. It is a real pain in the but, once it gets fairly estalished in your bore. Hence the "ammonia dope" treatments that used to be common on the line at the Nationals while nickel jackets were still common.

Has it warmed up yet in your area?


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
AC

Yes, I probably down-played the cleaning aspect of shooting CN bullets. It can be a real PITA. I've found that some of the newer cleaning solutions work wonders compared with the old ammonia dope, especially the abrasives like JBs. I bought an old Krag that barely had a hole down the barrel and a few hours with JBs, Butches, Montana Extreme, and others got it all out and I was able to shoot a bunch of the old CN bullets that I had saved, with little fouling if I cleaned regularly.

We never really had a summer here. Much like other parts of the US. My wife has yet to get a single ripened tomato from her plants. Without Global Warming we would have froze to death. Roll Eyes

Phoenix OTOH, is sweltering.

Ray


Arizona Mountains
 
Posts: 1560 | Location: Arizona Mountains | Registered: 11 October 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heat
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cheechako:
Phoenix OTOH, is sweltering.

Ray


I will vouch for that. I guess it wasn't warm enough last week so we are being punished for the next two days with 114 (about 45C) for a high. It will be much cooler later in the week however, you know, 109 or 110 (43C) Roll Eyes.

Ken....


"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. " - Ronald Reagan
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Phoenix Arizona | Registered: 16 May 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I see them every now and then for sail. They do last longer. But I can live without them.
 
Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I recall reading Elmer Keith writing of using the CN bullets when he went to Africa. I cannot recall now which year that was, maybe 58 or so.
I believe he thought poorly of them.
If someone has the gun notes his writing of them is there.
Frank
 
Posts: 6935 | Location: hydesville, ca. , USA | Registered: 17 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Frank:

As I recall, Elmer wrote that the problem was with the rifling in his .476 Westley on his 1957 Safari. He said the gun was virtually new, the rifling unusually deep and sharp, and that the jackets would sometimes rupture on the land cuts. That wasn't normal for CN bullets. The .476 Westley was obsolete by then, and the ammunition probably was pre-war production with cupro-nickel jackets.

Kynoch used cupro-nickel jackets for their large bore ammunition until WWII. That wasn't economically feasible after the war, so they switched to gilding metal for a short time, which wasn't successful. Hence the gilding metal covered steel jacket that followed in the early '50s.
-----------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."
 
Posts: 1742 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Mark. My memory just isn't worth much these days.
Isn't it amazing that someone as experienced as Elmer would take a new rifle and bullets which must not have been totally effective with him on a hunting trip as big as Africa.
Frank
 
Posts: 6935 | Location: hydesville, ca. , USA | Registered: 17 March 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Why are nickel jackets not common anymore?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia