THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Remington 798 on their website
Page 1 2 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Remington 798 on their website Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of ElCaballero
posted Hide Post
My problem with this is that it seems most people think that this same ol Zastava made rifle is somehow going better now that it has Remington stamped on it.

I don't care what they stamp on it as long as it is not overpriced for what it is.

What pisses me off about Remington is the fact that they are not going to sell actions only. I think this is a mistake. Here was a madern commercial mauser action that could be purchased by the common man and he could still afford to build a poor man's custom. Now you have to buy the whole rifle (dog turd stock and all) just to get what you are really after. Not to mention it is priced $200 more than when Chuck Daly was peddling them.


As a general rule, people are nuts!
spinksranch.com
 
Posts: 2095 | Location: Missouri, USA | Registered: 02 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ElCaballero:
My problem with this is that it seems most people think that this same ol Zastava made rifle is somehow going better now that it has Remington stamped on it.

I don't care what they stamp on it as long as it is not overpriced for what it is.

Now you have to buy the whole rifle (dog turd stock and all) just to get what you are really after. Not to mention it is priced $200 more than when Chuck Daly was peddling them.


There you go.
 
Posts: 986 | Location: Columbia, SC | Registered: 22 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BusMaster007
posted Hide Post
I think I see something about what you just said, El Caballero and gixxer...
( of course, now that I AM having a beer, a lot of things might look better! Big Grin )

From a marketing perspective, it behooves Remington to sell entire rifles, hence the mark-up for having a stock on the action.
Charles Daly probably didn't sell a lot of rifles, and possibly even fewer 'actions only'.

From a 'gun nut' perspective, such as we see here on the Forum, getting the action only to build a custom rifle is the norm.

Which brings me back to my former comments about contacting Remington about making sure they present the rifle in the best possible light, to inform the 'unwashed', and therefore sell a LOT of rifles!

People that frequent gun forums are more likely to be better informed; more likely to buy the rifle to get the action; and therefore more likely to be 'well-heeled' enough to afford the entire gun as a basis with which to work from in their quest to build a 'custom'.
That's the logic I see in it, anyway.

For the general population that would just like to get a really good gun for hunting, the more we can do on our end as informed consumers to assist Remington in getting their product out is a good thing.

I hope this post was a little more palatable... Cool


____________________________________________
Did I mention, "I REALLY LIKE GUNS"?
"...I don't care what you decide or how much you pay for it..."
Former FFL Dealer
NAHC Life Member
NRA Endowment/Life Member
Remington Society of America Member
Hunter in Training
 
Posts: 750 | Location: Upper Left Coast | Registered: 19 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would really like to handle one before I pass judgement. If I pick one up and really like the way it feels, balances and points. My mind will be made up.

But just like any other over the counter rifle, it will need some fine tuning at a competent gunsmith.

The one thing that jumped out at me is the fact that it is not chambered for the 416 RM.

Buy one in 243 for varmints.
buy another in 30-06/300WM
and one more in 416 RM and you would have all need for everything in the world.
All in a CRF action if it suits your fancy.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BusMaster007:
quote:
Originally posted by tiggertate:
fla3006 nailed it as far as the true Mauser crowd goes; why would I want a Zastava with Remingington stamped all over it when there are thousands of FNs and J.C. Higgins and Husqvarnas (to mention a few) out there for $200-300 less? That leaves only the curious and the ignorant (literally, not insultingly) for a market.


tiggertate, I only used your words to make a point, not as a personal attack on you, so please don't take it that way.



"J.C. Higgins"?
I have a .22LR bolt-action with that on it.
It's a MARLIN. A model 81, to be exact.

I also have a "SEARS 2C" .22 rifle.
It's a Winchester Model 131.

A J.C.Higgins is a true Mauser, more so than a 'Remington' made by Zastava?
C'mon!

I think some of you guys are rifle snobs, period.
So much so that you hold a blind prejudice against one company, that being Remington.
As if you would rather see this venture fail than succeed to satisfy your own selfish, twisted hatred of a company...much to the detriment of us all.
Some would construe that as a kind of 'bigotry'.
HARSH WORDS? YES.
There are plenty of examples in the world of firearms that have different names than that of the mfg.

What I've tried to suggest in a good way is that if we take this opportunity to assist Remington in getting the guns described correctly, they will sell more of the product and perhaps take some of the suggestions to the point of improving the product and offering more calibers.
The basic action is pretty good, from what I've read here and other places.
Let's get more of them available for future products and introducing new shooters to the virtues of 'CRF'/Mauser actions... Eeker...yes, I actually said that!

Simply cranking off "Remington sucks and they're stupid" shows a type of arrogance that doesn't do any of us any good at all.
Actually DOING something about it shows the good natured intelligence the Members of this Forum are capable of.

Brother, I just had to say that.
Too bad I didn't have a beer while ranting! Big Grin


I think you missed my point. So I'll try to make it better. I have nothing against Remington; I just don't think having that name makes a Zastava worth $200 more than it cost last year with Charles Daly on it. Just like an EAA Bakail shotgun wasn't worth $100 more just for stamping "Spartan" on it.

And I certainly know the action names I called out (add Whitworth to the list and early Interarms) have much better fit and finish than the mausers that Zastava has been producing since importation began again, regardless of the branding. So the point really is that you are not getting as good of a value in the new Remington and you're paying $200 extra for the privilege.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11142 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
.
 
Posts: 7857 | Registered: 16 August 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BusMaster007:
I think I see something about what you just said, El Caballero and gixxer...
( of course, now that I AM having a beer, a lot of things mi AM ght look better! Big Grin )

From a marketing perspective, it behooves Remington to sell entire rifles, hence the mark-up for having a stock on the action.
Charles Daly probably didn't sell a lot of rifles, and possibly even fewer 'actions only'.

From a 'gun nut' perspective, such as we see here on the Forum, getting the action only to build a custom rifle is the norm.

Which brings me back to my former comments about contacting Remington about making sure they present the rifle in the best possible light, to inform the 'unwashed', and therefore sell a LOT of rifles!

People that frequent gun forums are more likely to be better informed; more likely to buy the rifle to get the action; and therefore more likely to be 'well-heeled' enough to afford the entire gun as a basis with which to work from in their quest to build a 'custom'.
That's the logic I see in it, anyway.

For the general population that would just like to get a really good gun for hunting, the more we can do on our end as informed consumers to assist Remington in getting their product out is a good thing.

I hope this post was a little more palatable... Cool


Unwashed. Thats putting it into perspective. It reminds me of the gun shows here in the local area. They advertise "gun show prices" like its supposed to be a deal, but actually they mark up their shit so the "Unwashed" just walk in there and believe anything the seller tells em. "This is a great deal, look around. I have the best prices out of all the other tables here." Yeah right, but they are still on drugs with the prices they charge.

As far as the mark up just cause theres a stock on it, I was under the impression that CD sold whole rifles also. More or less, us "informed" folk that frequent the forums know whats up, and if they dont want to spend the money, they will take their business elsewhere. As far as sending Remmy an e mail asking them why they have marked up the price, they would probably feed us some marketing term like you are paying for "craftsmanshit(p)", but they would not lower their price until sales sucked for a year, and then discontinue the model before they lower the price.

How bout that angle? Thoughts?
 
Posts: 986 | Location: Columbia, SC | Registered: 22 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BusMaster007
posted Hide Post
Good angle and good answers, all.

I know I post some controversial and conflagatory crap a high percentage of the time... gunsmile...but this is a great Forum with high quality folks and extreme experience to prod! Wink

We really should be hammering the MFG. instead of each other.
One thing is for sure:
In our lifetimes, the MFG. has never before had the ability to accept feedback like they can today with the internet making it possible.
I'm going to contact Remington and basically challenge them to pick up the ball and run for a Touchdown.
Anybody else want to do that and check back when you're done? yankees


____________________________________________
Did I mention, "I REALLY LIKE GUNS"?
"...I don't care what you decide or how much you pay for it..."
Former FFL Dealer
NAHC Life Member
NRA Endowment/Life Member
Remington Society of America Member
Hunter in Training
 
Posts: 750 | Location: Upper Left Coast | Registered: 19 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The Chas Daly guns were really crappy. The Mk X's were a bit rough internally, but could be pollished up well. The Sears Mod 50/51 were great guns but only available in 270 & 06. They had a two-piece trigger which was easy to replace. The Mk X's had great barrels...Bohler from Germany. I wonder who makes their current barrels?
 
Posts: 1451 | Registered: 02 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Were the Zastava barreled actions exported to be sold as Whitworths better? Were Zastavas built to be sold by Interarms better than Zastavas built to be sold by Daly? Does anyone have the inside scoop that the Zastava barreled actions to be built for Remington are of the same (possibly low) quality control that the Daly imports were?

I would hope that when these barreled actions are stocked and final fitted by Remington that the finished product will be closer to the quality control of the better Zastavas made in the past. If Remington will be offering large calibers w/ sights for DG (from what others have posted) it sounds to me that the final product may end up closer to the Whitworth and less like a Daly. Hope so anyway.

Gary
 
Posts: 1190 | Registered: 11 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Iron Buck
posted Hide Post
A friend of mine has several MArk Xs. In the past two years I bought (2) left hand Charles Daley actions. Viewing the Mark Xs & the Daley side by side..........show them to be identical in fit, finish and function.
 
Posts: 813 | Location: Wexford PA, USA | Registered: 18 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
I think the later Mk Xs and the Charles Daly guns are about on par with each other.

The Whitworths were definitely better finished as are the early Mk Xs. At the later stages of the story, it appears that Interarms bought up a bunch of inventory already stamped Whitworth and sold that as actions and barreled actions.

The difference is in the last 5% of effort. That happens to be where the last 75% of value lies. If you can find a 40s or 50s action from the aforementioned brands that is original, put it side by side with any MK X and you'll see much straighter lines and much sharper corners.

Fewer internal tool marks too.

Little things like the checkering on the underside of the bolt is actually cut instead of stamped; the lever in the trigger bow instead of the shotgun style floorplate release, etc.

The Charles Dalys are very functional and I'm sure the Remingtons will be too. But I stand on my original postion about the pricing. It will kill the whole project.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11142 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fla3006
posted Hide Post
Gentlemen, my only real knocks on the 798 are the stock and the price.

I prefer a classic-styled stock, in walnut, with good quality checkering. If a stainless version were offered, I would want it stocked in a synthetic material or laminate, but classic-styled.

Regarding Zastava Mausers, I have owned 3 Whitworths, a Mini Mauser and 4 other Mark Xs and my experience since they were first offered in the 1970s is that they are very accurate and functional but the interior machining of the action and quality of polishing and overall finish can vary alot. However, I have also owned many more Belgium FN-actioned rifles and all have superior fit, finish and machining quality- either JC Higgins or other house-brand FNs but especially factory FN Sporters. Put the finest Mark X next to any factory FN Sporter and there is no comparison.

Perhaps $599 is simply what it costs to offer this rifle today but it seems like alot to me. One can still find plenty of superior Higgins M50s and their ilk for $250-$350 or a really fine factory FN Sporter for $550 upwards.

As far as contacting Remington about what I think, I did at the NRA show. They didn't seem to care.


NRA Life Member, Band of Bubbas Charter Member, PGCA, DRSS.
Shoot & hunt with vintage classics.
 
Posts: 9487 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 11 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HunterJim
posted Hide Post
I had the Remington/Zastava rifle high on my list when I went to The SHOT Show. I had also emailed the factory in Serbia for an interview, and they fixed me up with the names of staff that would be in Las Vegas.

In my opinion Remington stole Zastava away from Charles Daly by offering them a multi-year deal, when CD was one year at a time. Additional variations of the models are planned.

I also examined the M798 in the Remington booth: wow, I haven't smelled cosmolene that strongly since I was converting military rifles in the 60s!

I also had a good chat with another US maker who wants to import actions or barreled actions (you would recognize the name). The point is Remington does what they do, and they are not a parts supplier.

For those that this applies to, let your knots unwind. There is more to come. Wink

jim


if you're too busy to hunt,you're too busy.
 
Posts: 4166 | Location: San Diego, CA USA | Registered: 14 November 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Remington 798 on their website

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia