Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I believe Karl in Australia had some insight on this item. He was saying that the prices might be good as well. I'm very interested in a large falling block to build a .577 on and a huge one to build an 8-bore on. I would greatly appreciate any info you could send my way. | ||
|
one of us |
The only Info I can supply is that the spelling is "Farquarson"! Good luck in your quest, these are nice actions but I am thinking that they would be tightly held as collectors items on already built English guns. Cheers Pete | |||
|
<David J. Moses> |
Oh, yeah, and it is pronounced "far'-ke-sen". I pronounced it "far-kwar'-sen" for years until a perplexed young man from Holland & Holland politely corrected me. | ||
Moderator |
Isn't the Ruger No1 a modern version of this?? If you want an orginal, I suspect you'll have to look for a British ex military .577. Regards, Pete | |||
|
one of us |
Pete. I wouldn't call a Ruger #1 a modern version of the Farquharson (how many different spellings are there of that name?????)but just a rifle built along the same general lines, and probably a good deal stronger, as well. I have heard though, that the extraction system on the farquharson's were weak and stuck cases could be a problem with the old cordite loads in hot tropical weather. Might be something to consider there. Paul B. | |||
|
Moderator |
Paul, I can't argue with you on the finer points of action design, but it seems to me the Ruger No1 might be a better candidate for this "style" of rifle. As you say, I suspect they are stronger and that much easier to find. I know they have been used to for .458's, but I'm not sure about the modern .577 rounds... Pete | |||
|
one of us |
The Farquharsons are not hard to find, but they are hell to finance! try www.capeoutfitters.com Click on firearms, then on singleshot rifles. They have plenty of them and they average between $6K, and $8K, and those are all made of IRON and are not particularly strong actions. As someone here eluded to, they had a lot of extraction problems even with the low pressure rounds they were chambered with from the factory. I believe the Ruger No1 is a far better action, for conversion to anything that would fit. The 4 bore may require it's own action, as the Farquharsons are about the same size as the No1., and 577 is about as large as one can go in the Ruger. I have Ruger No1s chambered for 458 RCBS, 500/450 3 1/4 ", 450/400 3" , and am now looking for a No1 chambered for any of the belted magnums on the 375 H&H case, to rebarrel to 9.3X74R as the extractor/ejector for these are proper for the 9.3X74R, avoiding any more modification than is nesseccary, to build. The No1 is a good platform for almost anything you would want in a single shot,and for $6000, to $8000 USD one can build a very nice rifle on the No1, and that is what it will cost just to get a Farquhrson, to start with!
[This message has been edited by MacD37 (edited 08-04-2001).] [This message has been edited by MacD37 (edited 08-04-2001).] [This message has been edited by MacD37 (edited 08-04-2001).] | |||
|
<Rich Kayser> |
JD Jones will build up to 600NE on the Ruger #1/#3. Your rifle and well under $1000 for a rebarrel job. Had one in 500NE 3" before buying my Krieghoff. Rich | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia