Quote:

---

My only lies have been very obvious ones. How about, I am a college student majoring in early childhood development. . . LIE. Another, even more obvious bit of stupidity, I am a women...

ScottS, aka ASS_CLOWN

---

Quote:

---

Name one TECHNICAL comment of mine you have determined to be incorrect!

---

Quote:

---

To me, firearms are mechanisms which follow the LAWS of physics. When I tell you your opinion is pointless, wrong, or right, I base my statement off of applications (correctly applied) the LAWS of physics. ASS_CLOWN

---

Quote:

---

cowardly lion, aren't you?

I was sent your post via PM.... and I think you demonstrate you true character, to insult and revile someone that has publicly decided to not post in public, not read your posts.

What techinical information have you incorrectly posted?
where to begin.. we'll start with "increasing potential energy will increase muzzle energy"... which is total bullshit. Taking a bullet to a mountain doesn't increase it's ME... increasing JUST the pressure doesn't do it... increasing the usable area under the pressure curve changes EVERYTHING... in fact, troll, powder burn rates are retarded by additives, which, in fact, could mean there is LESS or the SAME potential energy in a case... just that it's burned OUTSIDE or more effeciently.

here's your post

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

jeffeosso,

Spare me the self righteous crap. If your parents had beaten you properly when you were a child you wouldn't be the insecure, smart-mouthed, disrespectful, cry-baby, punk you are today.

Name one TECHNICAL comment of mine you have determined to be incorrect! You cannot because you do not have the knowledge, or the experience to. The truth is you are an opinionated, insecure, jerk. You post opinion pure and simple. Your load data is typically gleaned only from QuickLoad simulations, as you are frequently off the mark by 150+ fps. You know next to nothing about thermodynamics, strength of materials, or machine design. All core compentencies for a firearms designer!

Firearms are not subjects of opinion, at least not to me. To me, firearms are mechanisms which follow the LAWS of physics. When I tell you your opinion is pointless, wrong, or right, I base my statement off of applications (correctly applied) the LAWS of physics. It is ABSOLUTELY nothing personal.

You will also note that I DO NOT take other individual's posts out of context to attempt to belittle, berate, or mock them. This is a behaviour exhibited by you in a consistent manner. Bullies like you are a sad result of the pussy society we live in.

Your only issue with me is that I do not cower at your pathetically ignorant posts. Now I suggest you do as YOU said you were going to and ignore me, and further stop posting about me.

In short, grow the hell up.

ASS_CLOWN


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

Quote:

---


while I'm most definately an asshole, I am far from pathetic



---

Quote:

---

and just who requires recognition?

It seems you lack the netiquitte to reply to a private message and you will be replying in public. Please continue to make the world fully clear that you are what you asscribe to others.I will be keeping a copy of this PM, just to post the full message, if you so cowardly choose to post a PM from me again.

yes, you are a coward. you posted a personal attack on me, when you KNOW I am not going to read it. If someone had not sent it to me, I would not have known. That's a cowards way, i expect, that you'll shoot when you KNOW the person's back is turned.


obsecure big bore?
376 steyr.. commerical round, newest introduced big bore
500 Jeffery commerical round, 80+ years old
500 A Aquare, saami round, very popular with custom orders, per gunsmiths
505 Gibbs, see 500 jeffery
470 Mbogo, www.470mbogo.com
585 Nyati yeah, this is a wild wildcat
, 600 OK, the subject at hand.

let's add to the list that I have first hand knowledge of, being "obsecure" 45/70, 416 taylor, 416 rem, 416 rigby, 450 marlin, 450 alaskan, 458 winmag, and 577 nitro... an obsecure list, to be sure... NOT.

Yes, the list of rounds that I have worked with,and/or owned and/or made (excluding the 500 a2505,585 and 600) that *I* have loaded, shot, chronographed and then compared results with quickload and hunted with.

Scott,
what I don't understand is your inability to say "hey, wait a second, these guys HAVE those guns, perhaps their data is a little crisper than mine" me and my friends, as you call them, and I am happy to have them, do own and shoot big bores. Yes, we were not born with this information, and yes, we had to gain experience in the arena. Since you only claim to own a single big bore, the 50 beowolf, I would think a person with, oh say, a 500 jeffery perhaps is a closer SME (subject matter expert) than a person running their (unnamed) software. In fact, I would think that you, who seem to have this amazing perception of self, would respect another's preception of self.

just some advice, if everyone dislikes your actions, then, just perhaps, your actions are inapropriate to the situation.




Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

cowardly lion, aren't you?

I was sent your post via PM.... and I think you demonstrate you true character, to insult and revile someone that has publicly decided to not post in public, not read your posts.

What techinical information have you incorrectly posted?
where to begin.. we'll start with "increasing potential energy will increase muzzle energy"... which is total bullshit. Taking a bullet to a mountain doesn't increase it's ME... increasing JUST the pressure doesn't do it... increasing the usable area under the pressure curve changes EVERYTHING... in fact, troll, powder burn rates are retarded by additives, which, in fact, could mean there is LESS or the SAME potential energy in a case... just that it's burned OUTSIDE or more effeciently.

here's your post

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

jeffeosso,

Spare me the self righteous crap. If your parents had beaten you properly when you were a child you wouldn't be the insecure, smart-mouthed, disrespectful, cry-baby, punk you are today.

Name one TECHNICAL comment of mine you have determined to be incorrect! You cannot because you do not have the knowledge, or the experience to. The truth is you are an opinionated, insecure, jerk. You post opinion pure and simple. Your load data is typically gleaned only from QuickLoad simulations, as you are frequently off the mark by 150+ fps. You know next to nothing about thermodynamics, strength of materials, or machine design. All core compentencies for a firearms designer!

Firearms are not subjects of opinion, at least not to me. To me, firearms are mechanisms which follow the LAWS of physics. When I tell you your opinion is pointless, wrong, or right, I base my statement off of applications (correctly applied) the LAWS of physics. It is ABSOLUTELY nothing personal.

You will also note that I DO NOT take other individual's posts out of context to attempt to belittle, berate, or mock them. This is a behaviour exhibited by you in a consistent manner. Bullies like you are a sad result of the pussy society we live in.

Your only issue with me is that I do not cower at your pathetically ignorant posts. Now I suggest you do as YOU said you were going to and ignore me, and further stop posting about me.

In short, grow the hell up.

ASS_CLOWN


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



It is you who are wrong and full of shit! As I said, IN PUBLIC (not hiding out in PM) you are an opinionated, unknowledgeable bully. Go educated yourself in the topics discussed or simply do not argue what you clearly DO NOT understand.


Chemical energy NOT YET RELEASED IS POTENTIAL ENERGY YOU MORON!

Or are you stating that the "First Law of Thermodynamics" is wrong because, well just because? Energy jeffeosso takes many many forms, and can be lump into two groups "potential energy" (any energy which does exist in a system but is not yet released) and kinetic energy (energy which is actively acting upon a system).

To me jeffeosso, the coward is the guy that runs his mouth off telling people how very talented and smart he is, and when called out and told he isn't one the other or both he goes off on name calling libel spewing rants, JUST LIKE YOU!

The facts are you cannot prove any of you accusations, since they are without merit and are false! I post under this ridiculous handle to mock you and Rob, and many of your "friends". You and most of you "friends" seem to thrive on recognition, which indicates to me that you are sorely lacking it in your real (not cyber) life. You and most of your "friends" hang out on the "Big Bore" forum and spew some truth, much half-truth, and considerable bogus crap, because:
1.) Many posters read this stuff, but have NO first hand knowledge so your risk of you or most of your friends getting caught in your lies is greatly minimized.
2.) Due to the significant traffic at "Big Bores" you and most of your freinds get the recognition you all so desperately need!
3.) You seldom if ever speak about common big bore, again the risk of getting caught is too high, sticking instead to obscure chamberings (376 Steyr, 500 Jeffery, 500 A Aquare, 505 Gibbs, 470 Mbogo, 585 Nyati, 600 OK, this list goes on). Countless times someone has requested load information (frenquently for one of these obscure cartridges), and all you and most your so-called expert "friends" can come back with is some QuickLoad simulation data. This is VERY telling of your actual experience.
4.) I have been here for about 5 years! I remember when many of your so-called expert "friends" didn't know a barrel recoil lug from a buttstock. So their "years" of experience speeches are a total waste on me. I remember when you showed up, spouting off all your experience, do you remember? I find it so very interesting that you and one of you buddies have managed a dramatic 180 degree turnaround with regard to Butch Searcy's rifles since those days (you both praise the heck out of them now, not the case back then, and actually quite the opposite).

As to what kind of man you are, remember you libeled me first big boy, I believe I summed it up well in my previous post.

If you really don't want to communicate with me, THEN DON'T Is that really so hard to comprehend?

ASS_CLOWN

---

Quote:

---

ASS CLOWN:

Quote:

---


while I'm most definately an asshole, I am far from pathetic



---

Yup, you're an asshole alright. As far as pathetic goes, you define the word. Craigster

---

I could not have said it better, Craig.

Scott Sweet's abilities at self-delusion are amazing to watch. Probably his only real skill.

Pathetic, thy name is ASS_CLOWN.

Quote:

---

Pecos,

Please don't call me Scott Sweet, I am ASS_CLOWN. You are embarassing me!

---

If you were capable of being embarrassed, you wouldn't be here.

It takes a bit of CHARACTER to be embarrassed...and you are devoid of that, Scott the ASS_CLOWN.

Quote:

---

I am willing to go to the local gunshop and take pictures of the rifles side by side too.

---

Quote:

---

One just can't argue with the maker, now can one? Jeffeoso

---

Jeffe, I have never seen you make a more foolish remark. The ASS_CLOWN, i.e. Scott Sweet, will argue with anyone. Why? Because he's a moron and secondly because he has all these wonderful formulas whirling around in his head. The boy's brain is mush. His mother was obviously impregnated with leakage from someone's colostomy bag.

Quote:

---

Chuck,
.....

I wouldn't hold my breathe waiting for an admitance of error... LMAO

jeffe

---

Quote:

---

We are discussing LARGE ejection ports difference, aren't we? ASS_CLOWN

---

Quote:

---

Chuck is correct, that is the reason for a regular rear scope mount and the "express" mount. The hole spacing is closer on the express because the rear bridge is smaller. Because the ejection port is larger. The action is the same size. GeorgeInNEPA

---

I must have gotten thrown off the horse in one of the turns. I thought we were talking about action lengths and ejection ports myself.

Sure the action is blocked to different lengths for different cartridges. ASS_CLOWN was grabbing at straws in a desperate attempt to keep from looking like total fool as usual.

But let's give him credit where due. We ALL were talking about Winchester actions. No one can deny that.

By the way, if my memory hasn't totally failed me, I believe there are even two or three different hole spacings for the express mounts. Last one I bought mounts for was a 375 and I seem to remember something about the year of mfg.

Don't bother to look it up in some catalog to impress me, ASS_CLOWN. I don't have that .375 and if I gave a shit, I would look it up for myself. I'm not going to get old enough to take your word for anything.

Anything I want to know about guns, I'll ask someone who knows what he's talking about, like Jeffe or Robgun or one of the other guys you are so jealous of. Know what I mean, Scott?

Quote:

---

There are a few personality disorders and run of the mill neuroses also where the patient craves any attention at all. Some even prefer negative attention. JCN

---