THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    The "New" London John Rigby
Page 1 2 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The "New" London John Rigby Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of 505ED
posted Hide Post
Mr Butch Searcy is right, the Trade is a funny thing-- Reto Buehler did a number of rifles for them and were of very good quality.

Most of the other guns--that come from UK dont start there. Barrels, and actions from Ferlach. Or Barrels and actions from Italy. SOrry to say even the vaunted names like H&H and others have there guns made (started) somewhere else.

At one time I think the Jeffery guns were made by FAMARS--now I think Hambrush is doing the work--ect.. Only firm I know that still might do start to finish work is W.R.

Ed


DRSS Member
 
Posts: 2289 | Location: Texas | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eezridr:
465,

How would you define quality? Function, artistry? or a combination. We all know that a AHR CZ 550 #2 upgrade is about as functional and reliable as you can get. It sets no standards for artistry. You do not require minute of angle accuracy for a Cape Buffalo at 50 yards.
I do not intend to be condecending.
What is the yardstick here?

EZ
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
It is worth noting that the original Rigby Co. produced at least three grades of double rifles. Their best grade was the full back action sidelock that we are all familiar with. The second and third grades were Anson & Deeley pattern box locks. They were differentiated from each other and the best grade by wood quality, action contour refinements, engraving and other unspecified cost saving measures. I owned a an early No 3 Grade for a short time in 450 nitro but didn't keep it because it had 28" barrels and was too heavy at 11.5 lbs. for me.

I think we just need to look at the currently produced Rigby's, either London or california, and judge them by their quality.

465H&H


eezridr,

I don't consider your question condecending at all. The quality range I gave above is not my grading but that given by Rigby in one of their early catlogues. I should have added that all their doubles, regardless of grade received the same treatment as far as regulation and sighting. WR does list their Gold Name boxlock as a best grade weapon in every respect, except for quaility of wood and lack of engraving. Holland and Holland also listed several grades of double rifles. I don't grade rifles as best or second quality and leave that up to the builder. I consider my Searcy Deluxe Grade to be as good of quality to 2nd or 3rd grade Rigby by the way.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
One thing that sayes it all about a company, is when a company established a couple years ago, and hardly ever build more than a few weapons, offers you and your successors lifetime waranty.

IMHO ther are 2 options
1 they are loaded with money.
2 they are loaded with BS

Eeker killpc
 
Posts: 571 | Registered: 16 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
quote:
The CalRigby bolt rifles in the past were made by Reto Buehler and Jim Tucker, two of the best craftsmen you could find. Most Europeans only wish they could do the same Quality of work.
Also back in the early 90'S I built barreled actions for Paul Roberts. Reason I point this out is that most of you guys out there has no idea what goes on in this trade.


I suppose my choice of words was inappropriate as far as using the word "quality". The Calrigbys may be very fine rifles, of high quality in build and execution but, to me anyway, never lived up to the style of the original Rigbys.
I notice they offer the African Express model on a magnum Mauser action now, which is a good thing, and they are building them more in the classic style, but starting at $33,500...really?!

Also, Butch, your point about most of us having no idea what goes on in the trade is well taken and very true.
It has always been that way though - the outsourcing and the not knowing.
 
Posts: 3395 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of shakari
posted Hide Post
Some of you guys might be interested to look at this:

http://forums.nitroexpress.com...=&topic=&Search=true






 
Posts: 12415 | Registered: 01 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of shakari
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jørgen:
One thing that sayes it all about a company, is when a company established a couple years ago, and hardly ever build more than a few weapons, offers you and your successors lifetime waranty.

IMHO ther are 2 options
1 they are loaded with money.
2 they are loaded with BS

Eeker killpc


Or alternatively, they just might have faith in their skills and their product......

Just because they're launching a new company and what I believe will be a very good product based soundly on excellent and proven design, doesn't mean they're inexperienced in the trade because that simply isn't the case.

I for one am more than willing to wait until the product is available and then let it stand or fall on it's own merits and I reckon anyone that isn't prepared to do that is either viewing them with alarm because they're worried about the competition or is making nothing more than childish assumptions based on nothing more than prejudice.






 
Posts: 12415 | Registered: 01 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Ghubert
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
Ghubert,

I just snorted coffee thru my nose onto the keyboard and monitor when I read about Roberts building a quality DR! The DRs he is building (err having built) in London are done so to try and bolster support in his court cases and allow him to advertise "London built". He bought a name and has been pimping the license to build under that name for a couple decades. Nothing more.

Rich
DRSS


I think you may be a little confused, Paul Roberts is not behind this latest Rigby venture.


I am also rather curious as to how you formed your opinion on his craftsmanship, the gentleman in question is widely acknowledged to be a double gun barrel regulator of some repute and not too shabby with the file either....

Do you have any of his work?
 
Posts: 11731 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 02 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Ghubert
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shakari:
quote:
Originally posted by jørgen:
One thing that sayes it all about a company, is when a company established a couple years ago, and hardly ever build more than a few weapons, offers you and your successors lifetime waranty.

IMHO ther are 2 options
1 they are loaded with money.
2 they are loaded with BS

Eeker killpc


Or alternatively, they just might have faith in their skills and their product......

Just because they're launching a new company and what I believe will be a very good product based soundly on excellent and proven design, doesn't mean they're inexperienced in the trade because that simply isn't the case.

I for one am more than willing to wait until the product is available and then let it stand or fall on it's own merits and I reckon anyone that isn't prepared to do that is either viewing them with alarm because they're worried about the competition or is making nothing more than childish assumptions based on nothing more than prejudice.


So you are a betting man then Steve? Big Grin
 
Posts: 11731 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 02 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of shakari
posted Hide Post
Mate, I've never even seen the inside of a betting shop but I'd be happy to wager a bottle of Ardbeg that the new doubles will turn out to be a very good product at a very fair price..... esp when comparing to doubles of a similar spec from other manufacturers.

Although quite how we'd establish the parameters of the bet I don't know! beer






 
Posts: 12415 | Registered: 01 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Ghubert
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shakari:
Mate, I've never even seen the inside of a betting shop but I'd be happy to wager a bottle of Ardbeg that the new doubles will turn out to be a very good product at a very fair price..... esp when comparing to doubles of a similar spec from other manufacturers.

Although quite how we'd establish the parameters of the bet I don't know! beer




I'll bet you a bottle of Lagavulin ( Ardbeg?! you must have hairs on the inside of your chest.....) that whatever happens folk will bitch and moan. Big Grin beer

I will not disagree with you on the observation in your first paragraph, but have to say that were I in the market for a reasonably priced ( these things are relative ) double rifle I would take some persuasion to abandon the likes of Churchill or Aitken, Grant and Lang for the new Rigby Boxlock, if the new Rigby were proposing to potentially financially overstretch themselves.

As Butch and PeterD point out, the practice of outsourcing work to independent specialists means that the name of the gunmaker, rather the manufacturer is the thing for people who worry about names.

For the rest of us I rather doubt that a bad double rifle has been made by any of the good London and Birmingham names.
 
Posts: 11731 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 02 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of shakari
posted Hide Post
Mate, I love Ardbeg or for that matter, any of the Islay malts..... they're like drinking liquid smoke! beer..... but I don't think I'll take your bet..... As you say, some will bitch or moan...... if only out of jealousy. Wink

Prices are always difficult but personally, I think I'd prefer to put my money into a new (British) double than an older one IF (note the big IF) I didn't know the history of the old one..... there's also the issue of how one price compares to the other..... again, I'm certainly more than happy to wait until I can see the finished product before criticising or complimenting.

As for financially overstretching..... no-one but the owners could possibly know if they're doing that or not but as I previously stated, knowing the people of some of those involved and the reputation of others, I seriously doubt they're stretching, let alone overstretching.

As for outworkers..... yes, it's always happened but again, I seriously doubt it in this case.

I also doubt that a bad double rifle has been made by any of the good London and Birmingham names but would say that the quality of some manufacturers has dropped noticeably on the rifles made post 1960s or so.

We also have to remember that every nation has their own style in these things. That isn't to suggest that one is necessarily better or worse than another, just that an American double is different to a German one, which is different to an Italian one which is different to an English one etc etc etc.

Hell, even the English and Scottish ones are have different styles from each other and consequently a large part of it is just down to personal taste...... bit like what makes a good malt whisky really. rotflmo






 
Posts: 12415 | Registered: 01 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
If you are the original purchaser. Should the metal parts of your John Rigby & Co. (Gunmakers) Ltd. shotgun or rifle fail through normal use, for any reason, including wear, we will repair your rifle or shotgun, free of charge, irrespective of age, for as long as you own it.



Time marches on and eventually we all pass on the life of adventures to those who must follow. In regretful acknowledgement of the inevitability of this, we also offer to our clients:



Pass your John Rigby & Co. (Gunmakers) Ltd. gun to your immediate family, Son or Daughter, Niece or Nephew, Grandson or Granddaughter and we here at John Rigby & Co. will extend that guarantee to them and their issue.



To me a guarantee like this looks alarming. How can it be possible for any company to back this up in lets say 70years from now???
Have anyone ever heard of any weapon that has no chance of wear or break. if used regularly over decades.
I dont even think that the old and famouse companys could back sutch a guarantee.
Ewen the large optics companies are backing on their 30years guarantee.

How can a relativly new company with limited fundings, truly belive that they can make their grandchildren cover sutch guarantee.

Personaly i dont know more than a few of the peoples behind the company, and i dont know how their products is finished. It might be excelent. But guarantees like this makes me wonder
 
Posts: 571 | Registered: 16 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of peterdk
posted Hide Post
jørgen

shouldent you be back in the shop producing instead of waisting your time on the forums Smiler
i am still waiting on that call from you ?

best

peter
 
Posts: 1336 | Location: denmark | Registered: 01 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
Ghubert,

I just snorted coffee thru my nose onto the keyboard and monitor when I read about Roberts building a quality DR! The DRs he is building (err having built) in London are done so to try and bolster support in his court cases and allow him to advertise "London built". He bought a name and has been pimping the license to build under that name for a couple decades. Nothing more.

Rich
DRSS


Rich,
You might want to check your facts on that.
 
Posts: 232 | Location: Queensland Australia | Registered: 04 March 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of shakari
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jørgen:

To me a guarantee like this looks alarming. How can it be possible for any company to back this up in lets say 70years from now???
Have anyone ever heard of any weapon that has no chance of wear or break. if used regularly over decades.
I dont even think that the old and famouse companys could back sutch a guarantee.
Ewen the large optics companies are backing on their 30years guarantee.

How can a relativly new company with limited fundings, truly belive that they can make their grandchildren cover sutch guarantee.

Personaly i dont know more than a few of the peoples behind the company, and i dont know how their products is finished. It might be excelent. But guarantees like this makes me wonder


I don't see why it's such a problem for you.

There are plenty of quality rifles and shotguns out there that are still going strong after 100 years or so. For example, I own an 85 year old shotgun that to the best of my knowledge has only been opened once since new. (and I know it's entire history)

Purely from a business point of view, I'd say it's a very good move. Firstly, it's likely that a large percentage of these firearms will be sold outside the family over the years and secondly even if it does stay in the same family when it breaks down in years hence, they may well be unaware of the guarantee and pay a local man to fix it. In my eyes, such a guarantee is a bloody good sales move that in reality probably won't cost them much at all. tu2

As for the large optics companies, some at least, make a lifetime guarantee rather than the 30 years you mention. (Swarovski for one).

As for their fundings..... how do you or anyone else have any idea whether their fundings are limited or if so, how limited? - Quite honestly, to me at least, such suggestions smack of nothing more than cheap, amateurish industrial espionage tactics.

I don't know if you're in the gun industry and are worried about the competition or not, but you sure make it sound like that's the case.

To me, the fair, decent & honest thing to do is to wait and see and then let the product and company stand or fall on it's own merits alone.

Even though they're sure to be out of my price range and at the wrong end of my career, I for one will be very interested to see the finished rifles.

If they're good or bad, I'll say so but knowing some of the guys involved and the reputation of others, my guess is they'll be helluva good.






 
Posts: 12415 | Registered: 01 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shakari:

I don't see why it's such a problem for you.

There are plenty of quality rifles and shotguns out there that are still going strong after 100 years or so. For example, I own an 85 year old shotgun that to the best of my knowledge has only been opened once since new. (and I know it's entire history)
I also have a shotgun 100years old that never has ben opened. But i never heard of any brand with 100years old products, where none has ben repaired. And that is the whole isue. I have on yearly base customers that wears out riflebarrels, because they shoot a lot, and i wouldn't be proud to give that kind of guarantee (i dont belive that our barrels wears out faster than most others) Do you realy belive that any new company can back that kind of guarantee, if a doublerifle owner in 40years wants to have new barrels on his doublerifle, with chupperlumps individualy handfitted barrels

Purely from a business point of view, I'd say it's a very good move. Firstly, it's likely that a large percentage of these firearms will be sold outside the family over the years and secondly even if it does stay in the same family when it breaks down in years hence, they may well be unaware of the guarantee and pay a local man to fix it. In my eyes, such a guarantee is a bloody good sales move that in reality probably won't cost them much at all. tu2
I ame a pretty oldfashioned guy, and i belive that if you put out a guarantee, you should be sure that you can back it up.

As for the large optics companies, some at least, make a lifetime guarantee rather than the 30 years you mention. (Swarovski for one).
most optics company is presently reducing their waranty preiods. Zeiss now only 10years (2 on electronics) Swarovski has also reduced their former 30years, and is only giving 2 on electronic. Kahles the same, Smidt & bender the same i guess. Leupold is the one that offers leal lifetime no BS. This basic change is IMHO good, as it gives a more realistic picture. What Leupold often does, is to give you a new, instead of reparing the old, and discountinued model

As for their fundings..... how do you or anyone else have any idea whether their fundings are limited or if so, how limited? - Quite honestly, to me at least, such suggestions smack of nothing more than cheap, amateurish industrial espionage tactics.

I don't know if you're in the gun industry and are worried about the competition or not, but you sure make it sound like that's the case.
Yes i ame in the gunmfg industry, and NO i ame not afraid of the competition, but i ame afraid of the risk that this industry looses every sence of credability, and letting the marketingguys lie, cheat and make empty promisses

To me, the fair, decent & honest thing to do is to wait and see and then let the product and company stand or fall on it's own merits alone.
The only decent thing to do for the company, is to produce good stuffs, provide the guarantee along the way, without giving pretty unrealistics promisses in forehand
Even though they're sure to be out of my price range and at the wrong end of my career, I for one will be very interested to see the finished rifles.

If they're good or bad, I'll say so but knowing some of the guys involved and the reputation of others, my guess is they'll be helluva good.


As for the quality of their products i dont know anything, and they might werry well make faboulos weapons, but IMHO they stretch it with that kind of pretty unrealistik promisses. And i don't think they needed, specially if they make real decent weapons.
 
Posts: 571 | Registered: 16 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of shakari
posted Hide Post
OK. The fact that you are in the gun industry and therefore in competition with the new company explains an awful lot.

I'd suggest you might consider concentrating on your own product rather than those of your competitors because I think you'll find many people (me included) will regard it as very bad form to play the industrial espionage game in what could be viewed to be such an underhand manner.

BTW. I think you'll find that Swarovski offer a lifetime guarantee on their optics. At least, that's what they say on their website.

Perhaps the fact that they do offer such a guarantee and their competitors do not could be that they consider their product superior to the others...... and you'll notice that the others have the good manners and acumen not to criticise Swarovski for offering a better guarantee then they do. Wink






 
Posts: 12415 | Registered: 01 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Her is a quote from the Swarovski webpage. So please mr shakari do your homework a little better, before spreading misinformation

quote:
When you buy this optical product from SWAROVSKI OPTIK,
you will own a top-quality instrument for which we grant a worldwide
warranty of 10 years for the rifl e scope and of 2 years for the
reticle illumination from date of purchase in accordance with the
following conditions:
If defects in material and/or workmanship appear, we will take
over material costs for the entire warranty period. We reserve the
right in such instances to repair or replace the instrument or the
defective part at our discretion. During the fi rst fi ve years we will
take over the costs for materials and work.
This guarantee in no way limits the statutory warranty obligations


Btw we dont produce any products competing with The socalled Rigby of London company
 
Posts: 571 | Registered: 16 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of shakari
posted Hide Post
You'd better do your research a bit better sunshine.... their guarantee appears to vary from country to country and product to product which I assume is why their website allows you to select a country and a product to see it's guarantee rather than just have a blanket guarantee statement..... as it happens, I was in a gunshop just yesterday and looked at some of their scopes and guarantees...... and they were lifetime guarantees.

However, all that is irrelevent. My point is that your vitriolic attacks on a product you've never seen, made by a company who's finances and set up you know nothing or virtually nothing about makes you appear to be making a very bad taste attempt at nothing more than cheap, amateurish industrial espionage tactics.

If you don't make any products that compete with the John Rigby of London company then I wonder quite why you should attack and criticise them so much?

Surely the choice of policies and products any company makes is their business and their business alone?

I'm sure the vast majority of people would have the common sense to wait until the product is properly launched and then let it stand or fall on it's own merits.






 
Posts: 12415 | Registered: 01 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shakari:
You'd better do your research a bit better sunshine.... their guarantee appears to vary from country to country and product to product which I assume is why their website allows you to select a country and a product to see it's guarantee rather than just have a blanket guarantee statement..... as it happens, I was in a gunshop just yesterday and looked at some of their scopes and guarantees...... and they were lifetime guarantees.
i actually did my research. Their warranty doesn't vary from country to country, but from product to product. And their new products the Z6 has the quotet warranty

However, all that is irrelevent. My point is that your vitriolic attacks on a product you've never seen, made by a company who's finances and set up you know nothing or virtually nothing about makes you appear to be making a very bad taste attempt at nothing more than cheap, amateurish industrial espionage tactics.
I didnt attact their product in anny way. The only thing i question is their IMHO unrealistic guarantee. A guarantee i find almost impossible to back up. I truly dont belive that anybody ever wants to put up the money needed to back this guarantee
If you don't make any products that compete with the John Rigby of London company then I wonder quite why you should attack and criticise them so much?
I don't criticise their product, as i never seen any of their products,and as i previously stated, they may even make damed fine products
Surely the choice of policies and products any company makes is their business and their business alone?
Offering unrealistic guarantee and prommising unobtainaly effects, can actualy damage other products in the industry, by putting them in a wrong prespective. A little like if an African outfitter suddently offered free and unlimited trophyhunt for polarbears in Zambia

I'm sure the vast majority of people would have the common sense to wait until the product is properly launched and then let it stand or fall on it's own merits.
 
Posts: 571 | Registered: 16 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
yurgie,

so, buy one and let us all know in seventy years...

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
yurgie,

so, buy one and let us all know in seventy years...

Rich
DRSS


"yerky" should be atleast 90+ years of age, judging from the grumpy posts...so seventy years from now on, the world might not want him around any more Big Grin


DRSS: HQ Scandinavia. Chapters in Sweden & Norway
 
Posts: 2805 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Ghubert
posted Hide Post
Indeed and ISS will be getting back to us about those shoddy Paul Roberts built guns from his collection! tu2 Big Grin
 
Posts: 11731 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 02 September 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    The "New" London John Rigby

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia