Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Mr Butch Searcy is right, the Trade is a funny thing-- Reto Buehler did a number of rifles for them and were of very good quality. Most of the other guns--that come from UK dont start there. Barrels, and actions from Ferlach. Or Barrels and actions from Italy. SOrry to say even the vaunted names like H&H and others have there guns made (started) somewhere else. At one time I think the Jeffery guns were made by FAMARS--now I think Hambrush is doing the work--ect.. Only firm I know that still might do start to finish work is W.R. Ed DRSS Member | |||
|
One of Us |
eezridr, I don't consider your question condecending at all. The quality range I gave above is not my grading but that given by Rigby in one of their early catlogues. I should have added that all their doubles, regardless of grade received the same treatment as far as regulation and sighting. WR does list their Gold Name boxlock as a best grade weapon in every respect, except for quaility of wood and lack of engraving. Holland and Holland also listed several grades of double rifles. I don't grade rifles as best or second quality and leave that up to the builder. I consider my Searcy Deluxe Grade to be as good of quality to 2nd or 3rd grade Rigby by the way. 465H&H | |||
|
One of Us |
One thing that sayes it all about a company, is when a company established a couple years ago, and hardly ever build more than a few weapons, offers you and your successors lifetime waranty. IMHO ther are 2 options 1 they are loaded with money. 2 they are loaded with BS | |||
|
One of Us |
I suppose my choice of words was inappropriate as far as using the word "quality". The Calrigbys may be very fine rifles, of high quality in build and execution but, to me anyway, never lived up to the style of the original Rigbys. I notice they offer the African Express model on a magnum Mauser action now, which is a good thing, and they are building them more in the classic style, but starting at $33,500...really?! Also, Butch, your point about most of us having no idea what goes on in the trade is well taken and very true. It has always been that way though - the outsourcing and the not knowing. | |||
|
one of us |
Some of you guys might be interested to look at this: http://forums.nitroexpress.com...=&topic=&Search=true | |||
|
one of us |
Or alternatively, they just might have faith in their skills and their product...... Just because they're launching a new company and what I believe will be a very good product based soundly on excellent and proven design, doesn't mean they're inexperienced in the trade because that simply isn't the case. I for one am more than willing to wait until the product is available and then let it stand or fall on it's own merits and I reckon anyone that isn't prepared to do that is either viewing them with alarm because they're worried about the competition or is making nothing more than childish assumptions based on nothing more than prejudice. | |||
|
One of Us |
I think you may be a little confused, Paul Roberts is not behind this latest Rigby venture. I am also rather curious as to how you formed your opinion on his craftsmanship, the gentleman in question is widely acknowledged to be a double gun barrel regulator of some repute and not too shabby with the file either.... Do you have any of his work? | |||
|
One of Us |
So you are a betting man then Steve? | |||
|
one of us |
Mate, I've never even seen the inside of a betting shop but I'd be happy to wager a bottle of Ardbeg that the new doubles will turn out to be a very good product at a very fair price..... esp when comparing to doubles of a similar spec from other manufacturers. Although quite how we'd establish the parameters of the bet I don't know! | |||
|
One of Us |
I'll bet you a bottle of Lagavulin ( Ardbeg?! you must have hairs on the inside of your chest.....) that whatever happens folk will bitch and moan. I will not disagree with you on the observation in your first paragraph, but have to say that were I in the market for a reasonably priced ( these things are relative ) double rifle I would take some persuasion to abandon the likes of Churchill or Aitken, Grant and Lang for the new Rigby Boxlock, if the new Rigby were proposing to potentially financially overstretch themselves. As Butch and PeterD point out, the practice of outsourcing work to independent specialists means that the name of the gunmaker, rather the manufacturer is the thing for people who worry about names. For the rest of us I rather doubt that a bad double rifle has been made by any of the good London and Birmingham names. | |||
|
one of us |
Mate, I love Ardbeg or for that matter, any of the Islay malts..... they're like drinking liquid smoke! ..... but I don't think I'll take your bet..... As you say, some will bitch or moan...... if only out of jealousy. Prices are always difficult but personally, I think I'd prefer to put my money into a new (British) double than an older one IF (note the big IF) I didn't know the history of the old one..... there's also the issue of how one price compares to the other..... again, I'm certainly more than happy to wait until I can see the finished product before criticising or complimenting. As for financially overstretching..... no-one but the owners could possibly know if they're doing that or not but as I previously stated, knowing the people of some of those involved and the reputation of others, I seriously doubt they're stretching, let alone overstretching. As for outworkers..... yes, it's always happened but again, I seriously doubt it in this case. I also doubt that a bad double rifle has been made by any of the good London and Birmingham names but would say that the quality of some manufacturers has dropped noticeably on the rifles made post 1960s or so. We also have to remember that every nation has their own style in these things. That isn't to suggest that one is necessarily better or worse than another, just that an American double is different to a German one, which is different to an Italian one which is different to an English one etc etc etc. Hell, even the English and Scottish ones are have different styles from each other and consequently a large part of it is just down to personal taste...... bit like what makes a good malt whisky really. | |||
|
One of Us |
To me a guarantee like this looks alarming. How can it be possible for any company to back this up in lets say 70years from now??? Have anyone ever heard of any weapon that has no chance of wear or break. if used regularly over decades. I dont even think that the old and famouse companys could back sutch a guarantee. Ewen the large optics companies are backing on their 30years guarantee. How can a relativly new company with limited fundings, truly belive that they can make their grandchildren cover sutch guarantee. Personaly i dont know more than a few of the peoples behind the company, and i dont know how their products is finished. It might be excelent. But guarantees like this makes me wonder | |||
|
One of Us |
jørgen shouldent you be back in the shop producing instead of waisting your time on the forums i am still waiting on that call from you ? best peter | |||
|
One of Us |
Rich, You might want to check your facts on that. | |||
|
one of us |
I don't see why it's such a problem for you. There are plenty of quality rifles and shotguns out there that are still going strong after 100 years or so. For example, I own an 85 year old shotgun that to the best of my knowledge has only been opened once since new. (and I know it's entire history) Purely from a business point of view, I'd say it's a very good move. Firstly, it's likely that a large percentage of these firearms will be sold outside the family over the years and secondly even if it does stay in the same family when it breaks down in years hence, they may well be unaware of the guarantee and pay a local man to fix it. In my eyes, such a guarantee is a bloody good sales move that in reality probably won't cost them much at all. As for the large optics companies, some at least, make a lifetime guarantee rather than the 30 years you mention. (Swarovski for one). As for their fundings..... how do you or anyone else have any idea whether their fundings are limited or if so, how limited? - Quite honestly, to me at least, such suggestions smack of nothing more than cheap, amateurish industrial espionage tactics. I don't know if you're in the gun industry and are worried about the competition or not, but you sure make it sound like that's the case. To me, the fair, decent & honest thing to do is to wait and see and then let the product and company stand or fall on it's own merits alone. Even though they're sure to be out of my price range and at the wrong end of my career, I for one will be very interested to see the finished rifles. If they're good or bad, I'll say so but knowing some of the guys involved and the reputation of others, my guess is they'll be helluva good. | |||
|
One of Us |
As for the quality of their products i dont know anything, and they might werry well make faboulos weapons, but IMHO they stretch it with that kind of pretty unrealistik promisses. And i don't think they needed, specially if they make real decent weapons. | |||
|
one of us |
OK. The fact that you are in the gun industry and therefore in competition with the new company explains an awful lot. I'd suggest you might consider concentrating on your own product rather than those of your competitors because I think you'll find many people (me included) will regard it as very bad form to play the industrial espionage game in what could be viewed to be such an underhand manner. BTW. I think you'll find that Swarovski offer a lifetime guarantee on their optics. At least, that's what they say on their website. Perhaps the fact that they do offer such a guarantee and their competitors do not could be that they consider their product superior to the others...... and you'll notice that the others have the good manners and acumen not to criticise Swarovski for offering a better guarantee then they do. | |||
|
One of Us |
Her is a quote from the Swarovski webpage. So please mr shakari do your homework a little better, before spreading misinformation
Btw we dont produce any products competing with The socalled Rigby of London company | |||
|
one of us |
You'd better do your research a bit better sunshine.... their guarantee appears to vary from country to country and product to product which I assume is why their website allows you to select a country and a product to see it's guarantee rather than just have a blanket guarantee statement..... as it happens, I was in a gunshop just yesterday and looked at some of their scopes and guarantees...... and they were lifetime guarantees. However, all that is irrelevent. My point is that your vitriolic attacks on a product you've never seen, made by a company who's finances and set up you know nothing or virtually nothing about makes you appear to be making a very bad taste attempt at nothing more than cheap, amateurish industrial espionage tactics. If you don't make any products that compete with the John Rigby of London company then I wonder quite why you should attack and criticise them so much? Surely the choice of policies and products any company makes is their business and their business alone? I'm sure the vast majority of people would have the common sense to wait until the product is properly launched and then let it stand or fall on it's own merits. | |||
|
One of Us |
| |||
|
One of Us |
yurgie, so, buy one and let us all know in seventy years... Rich DRSS | |||
|
One of Us |
"yerky" should be atleast 90+ years of age, judging from the grumpy posts...so seventy years from now on, the world might not want him around any more DRSS: HQ Scandinavia. Chapters in Sweden & Norway | |||
|
One of Us |
Indeed and ISS will be getting back to us about those shoddy Paul Roberts built guns from his collection! | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia