THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BOOKS AND VIDEOS of INTEREST FORUM


Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Patton biography recommendation
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Wink
posted
I would like a recommendation on the best biographies of Gen. George S. Patton. Any opinions out there?


_________________________________

AR, where the hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history become the nattering nabobs of negativisim.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Rambouillet, France | Registered: 25 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My favorites are:

Patton: a genious for War by Carlo D'Este

and very interesting:

The Patton Papers edited by Martin Blumenson
2 volumes, 1885-1940 and 1940-1945, Patons family papers,correspondence etc.

Have fun

SSR
 
Posts: 6725 | Location: central Texas | Registered: 05 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wink
posted Hide Post
Thanks Cross, I'll look at both of those.


_________________________________

AR, where the hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history become the nattering nabobs of negativisim.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Rambouillet, France | Registered: 25 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Make sure you get the one where he discusses ordering troops to fix bayonets and march on the WW1 soldiers who had set up their tent camp and were going to march on the White House/Congress to protest the fact that the govt had not paid them the service bonus promised in WW1. That he did so is a matter of public record.

regards,

Rich
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
That he did,however he was acting under orders from Douglas MacArthur.Also you are aware that he was aide de camp for "Black Jack" Pershing during the first world war + that Pershing married Patton's sister.
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Austin,Texas | Registered: 08 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
An officer is required to follow the lawful orders of a duly authorized superior.

Norman Conquest
I dont believe Gen Pershing married Miss Patton but they were close for a long time--that is where the Patton Papers gets so interesting--behind the scene original writings.

SSR
 
Posts: 6725 | Location: central Texas | Registered: 05 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Perhaps I stand corrected but that was how I read it several years ago.
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Austin,Texas | Registered: 08 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My friend,at the risk of giving offense (not my purpose) in relation to the following of orders from a superior officer, I thought was well put to rest at Nuremberg in 1946. I understand that the D.C. veterans 'riots' were prior to this. Truth remains the same my friend. I can refuse to follow an insane order....or not. I've done both + believe me the refusal left me with a better sleep ability;even the brig time was acceptable because I held true to my beliefs.Many years past but I can still look myself in the mirror.
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Austin,Texas | Registered: 08 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
there were no "riots", unless you consider the pernicious actions Patton took.
To order your troops to fix bayonets and advance on a group of WWI veterans trying to get the bonus promised them during the war, and then reneged on for more than a decade is the most reprehensible action a "Gentleman & an Officer" can take. Even obammy would not do such a wicked act.

Rich

I had an order given me in RVN I thought was wrong. Wrong enough to ask for it in writing. That ended the situation on the spot. The other soldiers on my team said the same thing. That #2 looie left the company less than a week later. We heard he got shot by his own troops less than two weeks later.
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree Rich which is why I hyphenated 'riots'.We are on the same page.As to your reference to Lt."Frag"....gee the looie bought it,best get back to Da Nang.
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Austin,Texas | Registered: 08 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Rich,I agree which is why I hyphenated "riots".They were perfectly within their rights to peaceful assembly + a request to benefits owed,even at a reduced rate due to non maturity.(it was the depression right?) Totally uncalled for actions by Macarthur + Patton as well.As to whether obanga would attempt such a stunt;well considering the financial state of the nation + in general the populaces displeasures (to put it mildly)with the government;that just might be the straw.Especially in this day + time of instant news messaging.
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Austin,Texas | Registered: 08 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Norman Conquest,

i do agree with the Nueremburg rules, but they were not in effect when MacAuthor gave Patton his orders. And I did say Lawful, that is what I was taught and can remain at ease with. Each Officer has to determine what is Lawful and be willing to stand accountable for his actions.

SSR
 
Posts: 6725 | Location: central Texas | Registered: 05 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mr. CrossL, perhaps we are are conversing on dual purposes. I mentioned on my posting of the 5th that I was on above + aware of the timing as to per se Patton V/S R/e Nuremberg. Yes I give you your due (+Patton's) [easier than thinking or taking action for personal responsibilty].Oh BTW...are you accountably for your actions..inside?No offense intended;this is conversation,please take it as such.
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Austin,Texas | Registered: 08 April 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia