THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIRD SHOOTING FORUM


Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
best non-toxic shot option
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Without spending a fortune on all the options available, and wasting a lot of valuable time and wildlife assets, what is the best alternative to real lead shot? Cost is not the main issue for me. I have tried several types of steel as well as Kent tungsten Matrix and Heavy shot options. Before I buy several cases of this stuff, what is the verdict? I want to be able to use some of my vintage shotguns as well as Beretta and Benelli options. I have been using Kents tungsten matrix #3 $ #5 and am fairly satisfied. Have some B for geese when I get the chance. Is there anything else to look at and try???


square shooter
 
Posts: 2608 | Location: Moore, Oklahoma, USA | Registered: 28 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Best but also the most expensivve, heavyshot.....

Best, most expensive, but can shoot in your old guns, heavyshot classic doubles....

Heavysteel is also good but pricy....

Me personally, I shoot whatever is on sale, and shoot lots of it.... Winchester xperts and kent regular steel both work really well, and for 12 to 14 dollars a box can not be beat.....
 
Posts: 589 | Location: Austin TX, Mexico City | Registered: 17 August 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
A friend in ND, one in ID and I all love Blackcloud. We all shoot 3" #3 or 4's and find it works very well on ducks and big geese. Most of our shooting is at close range over decoys but I've scratched out a few big geese at ranges I shouldn't of tried at. I'm looking forward to trying the Blackcloud Close Range model.
 
Posts: 9497 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I prefer HeviShot. It is expensive and the price goes up when you least expect it. I am glad I bought it when it was $31/box(10ga 1-3/4oz). Now it is $56/box. $3/shell was tolerable. $5-$6/shell is insane. I'll use steel for shooting over deeks and the pricey stuff for late season or long range.


We Band of Bubbas
N.R.A Life Member
TDR Cummins Power All The Way
Certified member of the Whompers Club
 
Posts: 2973 | Location: South Texas | Registered: 15 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
thanks all!


square shooter
 
Posts: 2608 | Location: Moore, Oklahoma, USA | Registered: 28 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of CamoManJ
posted Hide Post
+2 for Hevi Shot, especially for pass shooting & the big birds.

Cheap steel with proper choke for up close & decoying shots...IME.


"A Lone Hunter is the Best Hunter..."
 
Posts: 426 | Location: San Antonio, Texas | Registered: 25 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
After shooting Steel, Heavishot, the older federal tungsten polymer, and tungsten matrix, personally, I prefer bismuth.

The biggest advantage that it has compared to hevishot (or steel, for that matter) is that it will not shatter your teeth if you bite a pellet by accident.

It will not damage gun bores. Hevishot will. Tungsten is harder than barrel steel, so regardless it can damage the barrels. The usual way Hevishot avoids damage is extra heavy shotcups on the wads. Tungsten Matrix/ tungsten polymer has the tungsten in a plastic pellet- it works, but I have seen one extra full gun with a bit of ugliness at the choke from it- but it did not affect the shooting ability of the gun- the owner said the damage was caused by the pellets though.

Hevishot will perform better at extreme ranges and generally pattern better. Bismuth will work with identical chokes to lead, while heavishot usually chokes like steel.

Supposedly the new ITX pellets are between bismuth and steel for hardness, and act close to lead. I have not tried them though.

Bismuth you can use identical number size to lead. I usually use Bismuth #4 for ducks and pheasant when I have to use non toxic for them.

The tungsten pellets generally you can get away with dropping a pellet size or 2- to me hevishot 7's work as well as lead 5's for penetration, although the birds don't seem to drop as fast.

They are all expensive compared to steel. I handload the bismuth (and heavyshot when I used it) to get the shells I want, but if you want to buy factory only, tungsten matrix is the safest offering for vintage guns, unless you can find some factory bismuth (I haven't seen it in a long time.)
 
Posts: 11034 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Unless it has already been addressed by the manufacturer, the problems I have experienced with Bismuth is the shot was alloyed with tin and it was quite brittle. The Classic Doubles from HeviShot performs excellent and the shot is relatively soft.


We Band of Bubbas
N.R.A Life Member
TDR Cummins Power All The Way
Certified member of the Whompers Club
 
Posts: 2973 | Location: South Texas | Registered: 15 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hevi-shot for guns capable of shooting steel.

Hevi-shot Classic Doubles for older guns.

That's as good as it gets.
 
Posts: 620 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have been using Kent Tungsten matrix 5's and bismuth 4's and have no complaints with either. Much prefer them to steel.
C.G.B.
 
Posts: 1101 | Registered: 25 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I shoot WW expert high vel steel now 1550fps kills will.

I like Hevi shot but it really cost to much.
 
Posts: 19621 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia