THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
trump's rape trial begins today Login/Join 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The reason motion for directed verdict are typically overruled is because the Judge has to, by law, draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the non moving Plaintiff.

This is a motion for mistrial alleging the Judge has manifested bias against the Defendant by warning him his tweets are inappropriate and may subject him to contempt.

Of course, the motion for mistrial failed.

https://apple.news/Ag4B6lBdmRy-3d9MQQZz22Q
 
Posts: 13125 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
Trump's lawyer made a Motion for Mistrial. Basis was that he doesn't like the judge's rulings. I don't know how he talks his lawyers into doing shit that flushes their legal reputations down the toilet.


Skill Man,.... Trump's got mad skills.

Remember, Trump authored "The Art of the Deal".

Big Grin
 
Posts: 9793 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hey, it ain't Trump's money. It's the money of the suckers sending him donations.
 
Posts: 7297 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
The common motion is a motion for a directed verdict made at the conclusion of the plaintiffs case. It is essentially saying that the plaintiff has failed to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. They are routinely denied since the judge will simply let the case go to the jury and they can assess the weight of the evidence. What Trump’s lawyers filed is bizarre and atypical. It is essentially making a Charlie Brown-esk type argument complaining about the judge always picking on them. For a man supposedly with money, he sure seems to attract some oddball lawyers. I guess when you have a history of not paying your lawyers it might be hard to attract the best and brightest.


This would be exactly correct.

And, there might be a variety of reasons to file a Motion for Mistrial (which is different than a Motion for Directed Verdict) but a Motion for Mistrial because the judge is ruling against you on evidentiary issues is not done. At least in my experience. It's specious, unprofessional and probably unethical unless the court's rulings are really unusual and insupportable.


-Every damn thing is your own fault if you are any good.

 
Posts: 16346 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: