in the culture war, this time divorce.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politi...ce-harder-rcna152069

Amazing how these folks think they know better than the two people married to each other

Ouch. That one is going to strike a little too close to home for some of the members of the moral authority court here.

Divorce in the United States According to Religious Beliefs

1. Protestant Christians 51%

2. Catholics 19%

3. Jewish 9%

4. Mormon 7%

5. Muslims 8%

6. Hindus 5%

7. Buddhists 10%

8. Sikhs 6%

9. Jehovah’s Witness 12%

10. Atheists 11%

https://sacksandsackslaw.com/r...g%20to%20the%20study.

As we can see from my last post, Protestant Christians have a divorce rate almost five times that of atheists.

Bringing back at-fault divorce would be a boon to the private investigator business.

I never thought about Mormons or Muslims getting a divorce. How about that!

Bringing back at fault divorce would also increase the events of violence, I expect.

Given that most divorces come from financial and infidelity grounds, who knows if going back would change things. All that going to at fault divorce would do is massively change the financial aspects of divorce.

Japan still has at-fault divorce. As for the US, infidelity and financial issues are the main causes of divorce there.

An aggrieved spouse can file for divorce on grounds of infidelity, and receive the lion's share of property division. He or she can also sue the other party to the affair for damages for destruction of the marriage.

The private investigator business is booming there.

In some states with no fault disillusion, you can have a quasi at fault proceeding in that any material assets spent or delivered by the adulterous spouse to the paramours are subject to restitution to the non-harming spouse.

KY has this rule recognized by the KY Supreme Court. To be honest, it is seldom used.

A party has to plead and prove one spouse has used martial assets to benefit a paramour that requires that party to restore the marital estate subject to an “equitable and just distribution.” It is not equitable and just to let the devaluing spouse keep the marital assets that spouse transferred to a paramour.

Wouldn't bode well for trump if Melania pulls the plug.