THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
NitanHitler And His GENOCIDE! Login/Join 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
US money is a congressional responsibility.

If congress puts conditions on its disbursement to foreign nations, I don’t know that the president has to follow them as foreign policy is the privilege of the executive branch… but congress can elect to not send money at all.


This is another example of Biden’s ineptitude. He told Israel and the world we backed Israel no matter what back in October. We are now trying to change our minds.

I don’t think we should be telling Israel who their leader should be. If we disagree with their war, we can say so, and we can withhold funds unless the law precludes it… but unless we are willing to hypocritically defend a bunch of terrorists, we are stuck with whoever Israel elects.

Who knows, Israel is a democratic nation, they may well boot Netanyahu… but that’s their decision, not ours.

Given our experiences in the Middle East, we certainly have no right to lecture how to win a war long term there.


Biden’s attempts to help Ukraine are likewise problematic. He’s not been at all receptive to providing oversight with how our money is being used there. Ukraine is highly corrupt- even Zelensky admits to problems there- and while throwing money at it without regulatory oversight in the short term is sometimes necessary, the fighting over it now because “they need the funds” strikes me as just more evidence of his ineptitude.

Not that Trump’s recommendations wouldn’t work, but somehow Ukrainian capitulation doesn’t strike me as a good end result.

I do think that the Ukrainian war is more a European problem than ours, but it is ours also. I don’t have a great answer as to how to get the EU to pick up a more appropriate share of the bill, especially since we are in deficit spending ourselves.


We have every right in the world to tell Israel who we think their leader ought to be. They exist because of us. And, they have every right to tell us to stuff it. At the risk of losing our support. Which will never happen. Bibby is not popular in Israel. He'll be gone next go round.

And, it will change nothing. It is an intractable conflict. No end to it.

I say...let them work it out or let them keep killing each other. We ought to stay as far away from it as we can so long as it doesn't compromise our security.

Your comments about Biden's "ineptitude" are interesting. Tell us what he should do. He's trying to stop a war. Be specific.

And, we should abandon Ukraine to trump's butt-buddy in Russia? What a surprise you support that position. trump and his supporters sucking putin's ass. Bullshit.


-Every damn thing is your own fault if you are any good.

 
Posts: 16304 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
Hamid Karzi in Afghanistan.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamid_Karzai

Chalabi in Iraq.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Chalabi

The Shah in Iran.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Reza_Pahlavi

The last time we got it right was General MacArthur in Japan. Big Grin

If some of us haven't seen the light by now with all these examples of failures,......
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
And, by the way, fuck Putin.

We need to hold the line.

Which, at the end of the day, means we stand with with Israel.

Unless you are a geographical idiot.


-Every damn thing is your own fault if you are any good.

 
Posts: 16304 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
And, by the way, fuck Putin.

We need to hold the line.

Which, at the end of the day, means we stand with with Israel.

Unless you are a geographical idiot.


Russia has had a base or more in Syria since the 70's that I know.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You don't read too well sometimes.

Biden's ineptitude is/was not taking a stand and living with it. For someone who is "trying to stop a war" he had a pretty strong hand in starting it. I personally would have told netanyahu that we would offer cover in the UN for his elimination of Hamas. I would not have objected to selling Israel whatever munitions that they offered to buy pursuant to our already existing agreements and laws.


But I would have said that we are already broke and they will need to finance their own war themselves.

As to Ukraine, I already agreed that it is in our interest to keep Putin out. Its more in the EU's interest, but is in ours also. I already said in the quoted post that Trump's idea of capitulation to the Russians in Ukraine would result in "peace" and "ending war" which you seem to think is the goal in Israel... but it would not be a good outcome. Biden didn't start trying to have oversight of our expenditures as we went along... ineptitude. I suppose he hoped that Zelensky would hire Hunter to do oversight of the financial end of things... after all, that was what Burisma hired him to do... and you seem to think there was nothing wrong there...

I don't get the idea that Germany (as an example) can stay relatively debt free and limits its expenditures on Ukraine to "what they can afford..." and braking spending to protect their economy but we are expected to go trillions in debt to support other countries priorities.

quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
US money is a congressional responsibility.

If congress puts conditions on its disbursement to foreign nations, I don’t know that the president has to follow them as foreign policy is the privilege of the executive branch… but congress can elect to not send money at all.


This is another example of Biden’s ineptitude. He told Israel and the world we backed Israel no matter what back in October. We are now trying to change our minds.

I don’t think we should be telling Israel who their leader should be. If we disagree with their war, we can say so, and we can withhold funds unless the law precludes it… but unless we are willing to hypocritically defend a bunch of terrorists, we are stuck with whoever Israel elects.

Who knows, Israel is a democratic nation, they may well boot Netanyahu… but that’s their decision, not ours.

Given our experiences in the Middle East, we certainly have no right to lecture how to win a war long term there.


Biden’s attempts to help Ukraine are likewise problematic. He’s not been at all receptive to providing oversight with how our money is being used there. Ukraine is highly corrupt- even Zelensky admits to problems there- and while throwing money at it without regulatory oversight in the short term is sometimes necessary, the fighting over it now because “they need the funds” strikes me as just more evidence of his ineptitude.

Not that Trump’s recommendations wouldn’t work, but somehow Ukrainian capitulation doesn’t strike me as a good end result.

I do think that the Ukrainian war is more a European problem than ours, but it is ours also. I don’t have a great answer as to how to get the EU to pick up a more appropriate share of the bill, especially since we are in deficit spending ourselves.


We have every right in the world to tell Israel who we think their leader ought to be. They exist because of us. And, they have every right to tell us to stuff it. At the risk of losing our support. Which will never happen. Bibby is not popular in Israel. He'll be gone next go round.

And, it will change nothing. It is an intractable conflict. No end to it.

I say...let them work it out or let them keep killing each other. We ought to stay as far away from it as we can so long as it doesn't compromise our security.

Your comments about Biden's "ineptitude" are interesting. Tell us what he should do. He's trying to stop a war. Be specific.

And, we should abandon Ukraine to trump's butt-buddy in Russia? What a surprise you support that position. trump and his supporters sucking putin's ass. Bullshit.
 
Posts: 11200 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Foreign Policy goals by the Administration does not trump Congress role under the Constitution to control the purse. Congress does not have to fund a President’s ideas.

Foreign Policy is not the sole directive of the President. Otherwise, a President would not need Congress to fund, ratify treaties, declare war, or confirm ambassadors.

Your premise that a President can ignore conditions found in a spending bill is wrong. He veto the whole bill, but he cannot line item veto it. The Supreme Court has made that very clear.

What you suggest got President Trump impeached, and group of Senators tried to censure him for it to take the pressure off. If the vote in the Senate had went against President Trump, the Supreme Court would not have helped him. Unless they want to overturn some more, direct and controlling caselaw.

I did not support conviction for refusing to grant funds appropriated by an Act of Congress, but did support censure. That was because by the time the House voted the funds had been released.
 
Posts: 12633 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
History has not proven that, and the U.S. does not have a history of rebuking Israel.

The best example I can give of that is Bush pushing for Gaza-Palestinian elections.

Our History is very pro Israel as it should be.

It does not need to be pro-Netanyahu.


Your politicians BELONG to the ZIONIST lobby!

I have NEVER seen a politically fucked up country as America!

Bribes are totally legal.

Masquerading as DONATIONS.

The New NAZIS are ruling you lot.

Masquerading as ZIONIST!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69288 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
History has not proven that, and the U.S. does not have a history of rebuking Israel.

The best example I can give of that is Bush pushing for Gaza-Palestinian elections.

Our History is very pro Israel as it should be.

It does not need to be pro-Netanyahu.


Your politicians BELONG to the ZIONIST lobby!

I have NEVER seen a politically fucked up country as America!

Bribes are totally legal.

Masquerading as DONATIONS.

The New NAZIS are ruling you lot.

Masquerading as ZIONIST!


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...pse%20in%20relations

Ok, so help this Dimwit out, why did you slash aid to your "Palestine" by 98%?
Big Grin
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
Allowing the Gaza situation to continue is a self-defeating proposition. Assume you eliminate Hamas. You have created an entirely new generation of young people dedicated to the destruction of Israel. It is ludicrous to assume that you can kill ten of thousands of Palestinians, destroy cities and homes, leave people homeless and starving and not be creating the next generation of warriors dedicated to revenge and destruction. Personally I would like to see an end to the Israeli destruction in Gaza. Israel may be solving a short term issue but they are only creating an even larger long term problem for themselves.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would think that the executive can elect to not buy/pay for something funded by congress, but cannot pay for/buy something without them allocating the money.

Trump spending money for his wall when congress refused to pay for it was an abuse.

The congress can refuse to fund, but can not have its own foreign policy.

If the congress states we will give the money to the president for XYZ, I don't know that the president cannot spend the money allocated for X and Z and refuse to spend for Y. Congress cannot write a treaty, they can only approve a treaty that the executive has made.

Congress has an oversight role, not an active one in foreign policy.

Can an ambassador be impeached? They serve at the pleasure of the president, don't they?



quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
Foreign Policy goals by the Administration does not trump Congress role under the Constitution to control the purse. Congress does not have to fund a President’s ideas.

Foreign Policy is not the sole directive of the President. Otherwise, a President would not need Congress to fund, ratify treaties, declare war, or confirm ambassadors.

Your premise that a President can ignore conditions found in a spending bill is wrong. He veto the whole bill, but he cannot line item veto it. The Supreme Court has made that very clear.

What you suggest got President Trump impeached, and group of Senators tried to censure him for it to take the pressure off. If the vote in the Senate had went against President Trump, the Supreme Court would not have helped him. Unless they want to overturn some more, direct and controlling caselaw.

I did not support conviction for refusing to grant funds appropriated by an Act of Congress, but did support censure. That was because by the time the House voted the funds had been released.
 
Posts: 11200 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
Allowing the Gaza situation to continue is a self-defeating proposition. Assume you eliminate Hamas. You have created an entirely new generation of young people dedicated to the destruction of Israel. It is ludicrous to assume that you can kill ten of thousands of Palestinians, destroy cities and homes, leave people homeless and starving and not be creating the next generation of warriors dedicated to revenge and destruction. Personally I would like to see an end to the Israeli destruction in Gaza. Israel may be solving a short term issue but they are only creating an even larger long term problem for themselves.


I know you don't like me and don't want to talk to me, but if what you say is the case, why didn't that happen in Japan or Germany 80 years ago?

As I've said above, when we save our enemies, pass out hot chocolate and bandaids it always ends in our defeat.

Sherman burned Atlanta, JDollar hates him to this day, but Dollar sure ain't gotten frisky since.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
Allowing the Gaza situation to continue is a self-defeating proposition. Assume you eliminate Hamas. You have created an entirely new generation of young people dedicated to the destruction of Israel. It is ludicrous to assume that you can kill ten of thousands of Palestinians, destroy cities and homes, leave people homeless and starving and not be creating the next generation of warriors dedicated to revenge and destruction. Personally I would like to see an end to the Israeli destruction in Gaza. Israel may be solving a short term issue but they are only creating an even larger long term problem for themselves.


The Zionist Entity called Israel has been doing this ever since they were ILLEGALLY created!

Finally, most the world is seeing them as they are.

Criminals against humanity!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69288 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
Allowing the Gaza situation to continue is a self-defeating proposition. Assume you eliminate Hamas. You have created an entirely new generation of young people dedicated to the destruction of Israel. It is ludicrous to assume that you can kill ten of thousands of Palestinians, destroy cities and homes, leave people homeless and starving and not be creating the next generation of warriors dedicated to revenge and destruction. Personally I would like to see an end to the Israeli destruction in Gaza. Israel may be solving a short term issue but they are only creating an even larger long term problem for themselves.


The Zionist Entity called Israel has been doing this ever since they were ILLEGALLY created!

Finally, most the world is seeing them as they are.

Criminals against humanity!


So you are a, "River to the Sea" kinda guy.
Awesome.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Which seems like a good time to introduce this.


https://www.facebook.com/reel/380893978199182
 
Posts: 4841 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
Which seems like a good time to introduce this.


https://www.facebook.com/reel/380893978199182


Appreciate, but disagree. Your rights are yours whether I agree or not. Your "pursuit of happiness", (if American,) isn't subject to my blessing.

Over here we don't believe in fighting for rights, we have them, we are born with rights. It's not for anyone to infringe on the rights of an American be they a toddler, a senior or a meathead like me.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
But people do infringe on your rights. What do you do about it?
 
Posts: 4841 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
And, by the way, fuck Putin.

We need to hold the line.

Which, at the end of the day, means we stand with with Israel.

Unless you are a geographical idiot.


Russia has had a base or more in Syria since the 70's that I know.


And you have bases in how many countries??


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69288 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
But people do infringe on your rights. What do you do about it?


I don't think so, at the moment I can't think of any time someone infringed my rights. I could be wrong as usual but I'm drawing a blank. Regardless there is correction available after the fact. That doesn't mean the rights can be contested.

I think having rights is like having a pencil or some other simple possession, they/ it is just yours. Period.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
And, by the way, fuck Putin.

We need to hold the line.

Which, at the end of the day, means we stand with with Israel.

Unless you are a geographical idiot.


Russia has had a base or more in Syria since the 70's that I know.


And you have bases in how many countries??


Half. Half the nations on earth have United States military bases which I think is terrible.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
And, by the way, fuck Putin.

We need to hold the line.

Which, at the end of the day, means we stand with with Israel.

Unless you are a geographical idiot.


Russia has had a base or more in Syria since the 70's that I know.


And you have bases in how many countries??


Half. Half the nations on earth have United States military bases which I think is terrible.

Yes, could close half and stil police the world.
 
Posts: 483 | Registered: 07 May 2018Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: