Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
https://apple.news/AWuW4ropsRPKWAIIGTWgqvg AG Garland has appointed Weiss as Special Counsel with much broader investigative/prosecutorial discretion. Weiss’ stroke had been expanded to any Fed District that a crime has taken place. Before, Accor to this article, he was limited to crimes accruing in the Fed District Delaware was in. As the the Carpenter’s sang,” We have only just begun.” The immediate bottom line is HB’s tax deal is dead barring new facts. I will be honest. I do not see how this happens. Obviously, HB’s team thought he was being granted an end to all investigations. His attorney went on a press tour saying so. Weiss said other investigations were on going. It came to a head and popped. It seems rather amateurish to not have that straight. It also seems the two parties agreed the plea did not resolve all investigations. Now, we are here. If I, or you, were the defense, we would be trying to cut a global deal. I can see the Prosecution agreeing or not agreeing to a global deal. I do not understand how both sides can be confused, unclear, uncertain on that issue. The presiding Fed Judge did a good job. Now, if I were the Defense Attorney, I would be filing motions all my correspondence with the Prosecution to get the Presiding Judge to force together Prosecution to honor the deal, I say those correspondence say I have. Of course, the Presiding Judge could agree and still reject. The Presiding Judge, could rule, “No, you did not have the deal you thought you have.” Then, the question becomes would such a ruling interlocutory and not appealable or appealable. I lean toward interlocutory and not appealable without breaking it down. | ||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia
Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: