https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...62e52d7d416d10&ei=66

9h ago

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...88ccd88c542c8c&ei=18

Trump Shares SEVEN Posts in a Row from Guy He Listened to Instead of Lawyers in His Criminal Case

Story by Charlie Nash • 1h ago

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...208de083c3946e&ei=53

Trump v. CNN provides first clue as to why his lawyer resigned hours after Mar-a-Lago indictment
Story by Matt Naham • Yesterday 10:35 AM

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...208de083c3946e&ei=53

Trump v. CNN provides first clue as to why his lawyer resigned hours after Mar-a-Lago indictment
Story by Matt Naham • Yesterday 10:35 AM

After years of them yanking your chain and making you the fool, it is astonishing that you are still on it!!!

It is painfully obvious that the ones who said;

President Trumps is the greatest president in living memory;

Jan 6 was led by Federal, BLM, or Antifia Agents(

President Trump would not get indicted;

Or

The Election was stolen

are true fools who have had wool pulled over their eyes.

I doubt anyone could work for trump very long, he does not listen to anyone.

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
I doubt anyone could work for trump very long, he does not listen to anyone.

I bet he is tough to work for!!!

quote:

Originally posted by regor:

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
I doubt anyone could work for trump very long, he does not listen to anyone.

I bet he is tough to work for!!!

Idiots usually are.

I would never be asked to rep President Strunk. Assuming I did not think he derelict and direct cause of the Insurrection, I would not represent President Trump for all the Whisky in Ireland. That is because his lawyers trying to please him get into a lot of trouble with law enforcement and Disciplinary Actions.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by regor:

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
I doubt anyone could work for trump very long, he does not listen to anyone.

I bet he is tough to work for!!!

Idiots usually are.

Soooooooo things are better in our nation now than when he was in office?

Is it possible that both Trump and Biden are both idiots? Not a zero sum game.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
Is it possible that both Trump and Biden are both idiots? Not a zero sum game.

That's always a possibility, but our nation wasn't killing citizens in foreign nations under false pretenses and economically, we were much stronger.

Don't believe me, take a look at one of your beloved fake news sites that had to admit it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-t...rong-track-rcna68138

71% wrong track............

President Trump authorized military strikes on the Middle East multiple times.

President Biden had sent No troops not used direct US military force.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
President Trump authorized military strikes on the Middle East multiple times.

President Biden had sent No troops not used direct US military force.

As I stated earlier, he bombed Syria early on, which was BS and other than the Soleimani situation, I don't recall that.

He did authorize the deployment of additional U.S. forces to the Middle East to strengthen air and missile defenses around Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Biden and his warmonger's new playground is now Eastern Ukraine, after he left the poor Afghani's to fend for themselves, while giving the Taliban a shitload of our equipment!!!!

Now do Obama.

And President Trump ordered the killing of an Iranian General.

So, what are we up to? 3 direct military actions by President Trump to none by President Biden.

Facts are a pain are they not.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
And President Trump ordered the killing of an Iranian General.

So, what are we up to? 3 direct military actions by President Trump to none by President Biden.

Facts are a pain are they not.

Good God Hymen, did you see the Soleimani in my post you deranged clown?


And facts are a bitch.............


https://www.nytimes.com/2021/0...ike-afghanistan.html


A family of 10 you imbecile. At least my guy hits his target!!!


Here's another you blithering idiot!!!

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/a...eagues-resettlement/

God save the queen!!!!!

Fair enough. What direct military action has President Biden took.

The answer is still at least 3 for Trump and 0 for Biden.

President Trump almost started ear with Iran.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/0...tics/iran-trump.html

Here is the other Guy President Trump sent in troops to kill.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50200339.amp

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
President Trump almost started ear with Iran.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/0...tics/iran-trump.html

Here is the other Guy President Trump sent in troops to kill.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50200339.amp

Good Lord, you are a certified imbecile Hymen..........

You provide a link about Trump taking out an ISIS leader in defense of your King Imbecile, without knowing this..............


https://www.whitehouse.gov/bri...tion-in-afghanistan/


I have a rule with some REALLY mentally challenged liberals called the Bobby rule. It's that age old saying, "“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”

You're getting close buddy.

Again, which President has more direct US Military involvement?

That would be President Trump.

Which President almost brought us into a shooting war w Iran?

That would be President Trump.

You keep being you baby. Someone has to.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
Again, which President has more direct US Military involvement?

That would be President Trump.

Which President almost brought us into a shooting war w Iran?

That would be President Trump.

You keep being you baby. Someone has to.

Boy, you are one dumb sum bitch..........






You day drinking that shine maybe?

quote:

Originally posted by regor:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by regor:

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
I doubt anyone could work for trump very long, he does not listen to anyone.

I bet he is tough to work for!!!

Idiots usually are.

Soooooooo things are better in our nation now than when he was in office?

Tough to work for surly, because he doesn't listen, but also because he doesn't pay.

Things are worse now directly attributable to Trumpism, with prospects of getting worse before better. It all depends on how long Trumpism lasts.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

Originally posted by regor:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by regor:

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
I doubt anyone could work for trump very long, he does not listen to anyone.

I bet he is tough to work for!!!

Idiots usually are.

Soooooooo things are better in our nation now than when he was in office?

Tough to work for surly, because he doesn't listen, but also because he doesn't pay.

Things are worse now directly attributable to Trumpism, with prospects of getting worse before better. It all depends on how long Trumpism lasts.

2.5 years in and 71% say the country is on the wrong track.............





You clowns are the best!!!

The wrong Track surly is Trumpism, or any remnant thereof.

Until it's like 90% who agree that's the wrong track, we will have division and problems.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
The wrong Track surly is Trumpism, or any remnant thereof.

Until it's like 90% who agree that's the wrong track, we will have division and problems.

How can you possibly call right track/ wrong track, a Trumpism? That particular metric has been on a steady decline during Bidens Administration. His cabinet closely resembles the village people, inflation is making us all poorer, oil prices off the hook, the Chinese are mocking us in the skies and in the seas, topless trans folks parading around the White House, a historic symbol of American Exceptionalism.

China and Russia have got to be having a good laugh at us right now.

If the "track" is steadfast, your leader is going to jail, pursuant to the rule of law which he distains. Yet those who empowered this situation would do it again.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
If the "track" is steadfast, your leader is going to jail, pursuant to the rule of law which he distains. Yet those who empowered this situation would do it again.

Not completely sure we’re even talking about the same thing?

Biden felt the need to “over-reverse” Trump policy to the point of ridiculous.

The border was functional, fuel prices were reasonable, Russia and China were behaving themselves, etc.

Just because many hate Trump, doesn’t mean all his policies were bad. I believe right track/wrong track refers to policies such as I mentioned

Russia was not behaving itself.

It was still in Crimea and destabilizing Eastern Ukraine.

37 Times President Trump was soft on Russia.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/1...on-russia/index.html

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-m...aine-trump-rcna19045

Let us not forget. President Trump’s war on NATO that benefited and emboldened Putin.

China was developing new viruses.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
Russia was not behaving itself.

It was still in Crimea and destabilizing Eastern Ukraine.

37 Times President Trump was soft on Russia.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/1...on-russia/index.html

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-m...aine-trump-rcna19045

Let us not forget. President Trump’s war on NATO that benefited and emboldened Putin.

China was developing new viruses.

And who was President during the Crimea? annexation?

And who is President now, with Ukraine?

Who was President when the joint chiefs took it upon themselves to “assure” China that Trump isn’t going to launch a salvo of ICBM’s

His adversaries may have seen him as unstable, but they kept their shit tight and at home, not knowing what he may do.

And fuel prices?

President Obama. Who cares less that he stayed there while attacking NATO? President Trump.

Remember the trade war w China during President Trump. What did it gain us? I am all for taxing US companies manufactured goods coming back into the USA.

Does not change the point. Russia was not “behaving” during President Trump.

I knew you would not read anything, but I posted sources anyway.

Fuel prices was not asserted by you, but I believe if we went into lockdown now, gas prices would come down like they did. No demand for the supply when we all stay at home.

Premium and diesel are under 4 here. 3.48 for Premium.
Regular 2.95. Those numbers are in line with late President Bush; even as we grapple w inflation. They are in line with President Trump pre Covid.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
President Obama. Who cares less that he stayed there while attacking NATO? President Trump.

Remember the trade war w China during President Trump. What did it gain us? I am all for taxing US companies manufactured goods coming back into the USA.

Does not change the point. Russia was not “behaving” during President Trump.

I knew you would not read anything, but I posted sources anyway.

Fuel prices was not asserted by you, but I believe if we went into lockdown now, gas prices would come down like they did. No demand for the supply when we all stay at home.

Premium and diesel are under 4 here. 3.48 for Premium.
Regular 2.95. Those numbers are in line with late President Bush; even as we grapple w inflation. They are in line with President Trump pre Covid.

I did not open your links. I’m not gonna lie about it.

I just search fuel prices, pre-pandemic. 2019 average was 2.60 nation wide for regular unleaded.

Fueling my boat went from ~720 up to ~1250. Supply and demand, sure. But when our domestic supply gets handicapped, then Saudi cuts production twice by a total north of 2 million barrels, supply goes down, price obviously goes up.

Those prices translate into everything we purchase going up. You’re a smart guy, you knew this already.

I am sorry. I only publish links to actual news cites, Pew, and Federal Court Cases, pdfs of legislation, and Fed Court records.

I do not post Russian propaganda.

2.98 to 2.60

Yeah, we are being destroyed. No, and you knew that already.

This is a big problem for Biden. If real wages don’t turn positive and soon, preferably through a significant slowdown in inflation, then voters will give his administration no credit for all the jobs created. Make no mistake — it only gets tougher for Biden on the jobs front from here. With a significant slowdown in the economy forecast this year, or even a recession, the median estimate of more than 50 economists surveyed by Bloomberg is for the unemployment rate to rise to 4.4% by the end of 2023 and to 4.8% in 2024 — both higher than pre-Covid levels.

From Bloomberg. I cannot argue otherwise.

Oh, and even if President Trump did everything right, his “ policy” considering the election and transfer of power is the unforgivable sin that should be politically damning.

It is the crime against our Constitutional Principles for a defeated President not to defend out Government duly in session to transfer power to the next government.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
I am sorry. I only publish links to actual news cites, Pew, and Federal Court Cases, pdfs of legislation, and Fed Court records.

I do not post Russian propaganda.

But I obviously do? Noted.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
I am sorry. I only publish links to actual news cites, Pew, and Federal Court Cases, pdfs of legislation, and Fed Court records.

I do not post Russian propaganda.

But I obviously do? Noted.

I do not think you do.

This new guy you are enjoying does. Most of the time he post no citation nor source.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
I am sorry. I only publish links to actual news cites, Pew, and Federal Court Cases, pdfs of legislation, and Fed Court records.

I do not post Russian propaganda.

But I obviously do? Noted.

I do not think you do.

This new guy you are enjoying does. Most of the time he post no citation nor source.

I honestly just enjoy the banter. I can’t remember anyone coming into the PF scene that has caused the reaction Regor has.

Aren’t fresh faces a welcome change? He’s made you guys try harder, rather than the liberal echo chamber it normally is down here.

Fair enough.

I do not consider it banter.

Banter is arguing Wheated Bourbon vs Rye Bourbon.

We will have to leave it at that.

Steve Ahrenberg, shame on you, sir. You have sounded like a reasonable conservative, even though I disagree with you on many things. But I submit you find this troll, this tick amusing only because you agree with his politics.

I'm among those who have decided to ignore the Tick because he feeds off attention. Furthermore, I gain no information, no enlightenment from reading his posts. Most of the other posters here do provide authority or a rational argument to support their positions. I'm interested in dueling with them.

I feel sorry you have to fill your boat's gas tank at greater expense, but don't forget who was in office when the Covid lockdown occurred. The lockdown suppressed both travel and industry, and therefore the demand for oil. Prices were artificially lowered because of the Covid panic--the big cause of current inflation.

Sorry about this, but I'd rather have a stable non-psychopath in office, even if you have to pay more to fuel your boat.

If the shoe fits . . . .

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Steve Ahrenberg, shame on you, sir. You have sounded like a reasonable conservative, even though I disagree with you on many things. But I submit you find this troll, this tick amusing only because you agree with his politics.

I'm among those who have decided to ignore the Tick because he feeds off attention. Furthermore, I gain no information, no enlightenment from reading his posts. Most of the other posters here do provide authority or a rational argument to support their positions. I'm interested in dueling with them.

I feel sorry you have to fill your boat's gas tank at greater expense, but don't forget who was in office when the Covid lockdown occurred. The lockdown suppressed both travel and industry, and therefore the demand for oil. Prices were artificially lowered because of the Covid panic--the big cause of current inflation.

Sorry about this, but I'd rather have a stable non-psychopath in office, even if you have to pay more to fuel your boat.

I do consider myself a reasonable conservative. I’m even center or center left on a very few issues. I think we all have traits that make us contemplate our own beliefs.

As to Regor, why is it bad to laugh at life? Why can’t you see the humor in his approach? Life can’t be taken that seriously that just because you and I have differing political views, we can’t share a laugh or engage in debate without “hating” Or marginalizing each other?

Heym said last night that he doesn’t consider it banter. Why not let it go and just be a couple folks with political differences? I made a comment about throwing poo a couple days ago. MJines picked up on it and shot back at Regor with throwing poo memes. I find his response as equally amusing as Regors. Fair?

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
If the shoe fits . . . .

Great post Mike, glad to see you enjoy self deprecating humor.