The Accurate Reloading Forums
Is it time…
25 February 2025, 22:47
TumbleweedIs it time…
…to remove the U.S. from the ‘Five Eyes’?
The current administration has clearly demonstrated its fealty to Russia instead of its historical allies. In view of that, I feel that the Americans can no longer be trusted with western intel.
I think it’s time for the other four members to exclude them. France has shown itself to be more trustworthy, and an excellent source of intel gathering - perhaps they should replace the U.S. in this extremely important group.
What do you Aussies and Kiwis and Brits think about this?
25 February 2025, 23:04
shanksponyIt's a shit sandwich! I don't see that happening and too early yet to make a call like that. But I do see a potential level of distrust forming which might well see individual members choose not to disclose certain info. And it plays into the hands of our socialists, who have been pushing for us too leave for some time.
Chinas latest stunts though will be and have already proven to be a bigger impactor.
25 February 2025, 23:52
Steve Ahrenbergquote:
Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
…to remove the U.S. from the ‘Five Eyes’?
The current administration has clearly demonstrated its fealty to Russia instead of its historical allies. In view of that, I feel that the Americans can no longer be trusted with western intel.
I think it’s time for the other four members to exclude them. France has shown itself to be more trustworthy, and an excellent source of intel gathering - perhaps they should replace the U.S. in this extremely important group.
What do you Aussies and Kiwis and Brits think about this?
Yet nary a word about Biden AND Obama sharing intelligence with Iran in regards to Israeli attacks. "Consistency is the hobgoblin of the liberal mind".
Formerly "Nganga"
25 February 2025, 23:57
Steve Bertramquote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
quote:
Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
…to remove the U.S. from the ‘Five Eyes’?
The current administration has clearly demonstrated its fealty to Russia instead of its historical allies. In view of that, I feel that the Americans can no longer be trusted with western intel.
I think it’s time for the other four members to exclude them. France has shown itself to be more trustworthy, and an excellent source of intel gathering - perhaps they should replace the U.S. in this extremely important group.
What do you Aussies and Kiwis and Brits think about this?
Yet nary a word about Biden AND Obama sharing intelligence with Iran in regards to Israeli attacks. "Consistency is the hobgoblin of the liberal mind".
You fail to grasp the severity of Trump betraying our allies.
26 February 2025, 00:01
RolandtheHeadlessIf I were one of our allies (previous allies, I mean) I would presume that anything shared with Trump will be passed on to Putin. No way I'd give the US a shred of information.
26 February 2025, 00:17
JefffiveNo competent intelligence official will share sensitive information, particularly sources and methods, with Donald Trump or Tulsi Gabbard.
Knowing where information comes from or how it was obtained is often critical to assessing its credibility, but compromising that info gets sources killed and access closed.
Trump and Gabbard are obviously more loyal to Putin than they are any of our traditional allies, and nobody sees it plainer than those allies.
If we're going to stupidly blunder through the world following the moron MAGAts elected we might as well be blind while we're at it.
"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
26 February 2025, 00:24
HerrBergquote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
No competent intelligence official will share sensitive information, particularly sources and methods, with Donald Trump or Tulsi Gabbard.
Knowing where information comes from or how it was obtained is often critical to assessing its credibility, but compromising that info gets sources killed and access closed.
Trump and Gabbard are obviously more loyal to Putin than they are any of our traditional allies, and nobody sees it plainer than those allies.
If we're going to stupidly blunder through the world following the moron MAGAts elected we might as well be blind while we're at it.
The public sector in nordic countries have already started to raise questions about the use of us-based cloud services such as azure, o365, aws etc.
Because no longer trustworthy.
Write hard and clear about what hurts
-E. Hemingway
26 February 2025, 00:44
medvedquote:
Originally posted by HerrBerg:
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
No competent intelligence official will share sensitive information, particularly sources and methods, with Donald Trump or Tulsi Gabbard.
Knowing where information comes from or how it was obtained is often critical to assessing its credibility, but compromising that info gets sources killed and access closed.
Trump and Gabbard are obviously more loyal to Putin than they are any of our traditional allies, and nobody sees it plainer than those allies.
If we're going to stupidly blunder through the world following the moron MAGAts elected we might as well be blind while we're at it.
The public sector in nordic countries have already started to raise questions about the use of us-based cloud services such as azure, o365, aws etc.
Because no longer trustworthy.
here it s starlink and not only on the public sector but the public as well ...
26 February 2025, 01:46
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by HerrBerg:
The public sector in nordic countries have already started to raise questions about the use of us-based cloud services such as azure, o365, aws etc.
Because no longer trustworthy.
Maybe, I am not longer active with a GDPR company, but gdpr keeps that data in the EU
So, my position would be, nah, no more than usual
26 February 2025, 14:45
HerrBergquote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by HerrBerg:
The public sector in nordic countries have already started to raise questions about the use of us-based cloud services such as azure, o365, aws etc.
Because no longer trustworthy.
Maybe, I am not longer active with a GDPR company, but gdpr keeps that data in the EU
So, my position would be, nah, no more than usual
That's "privacy by policy", which requires trust. Data halls run from the us by us-based companies. Physical storage/processing makes no difference if there is no trust the us will honor past treaties - which the us has made clear they won't.
Write hard and clear about what hurts
-E. Hemingway
26 February 2025, 18:00
jeffeossoYeah,
i said I wasn't CURRENTLY working for a subject to GDPR company, I didn't say I was either inexperienced or unaware of GDPR --
your generalization is what a citizen, non-practitioner might say to summarize, but it's incorrect
literally physical storage and processing is the core of the deal, alongside privacy ..
but, hey, tell ya what, let me know when the EU, other than perhaps (at one time) Atos, comes up with a global reach cloud company (non-EU companies don't count) that is critical to running global businesses...
heck, just LMK when they come up with a fully functional excel replacement
27 February 2025, 05:55
JTEXquote:
Originally posted by HerrBerg:
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
No competent intelligence official will share sensitive information, particularly sources and methods, with Donald Trump or Tulsi Gabbard.
Knowing where information comes from or how it was obtained is often critical to assessing its credibility, but compromising that info gets sources killed and access closed.
Trump and Gabbard are obviously more loyal to Putin than they are any of our traditional allies, and nobody sees it plainer than those allies.
If we're going to stupidly blunder through the world following the moron MAGAts elected we might as well be blind while we're at it.
The public sector in nordic countries have already started to raise questions about the use of us-based cloud services such as azure, o365, aws etc.
Because no longer trustworthy.
Send out the Dragon ships furriner! We'll be waiting
