THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  The Political Forum    President Trump new recording of him exhibiting the Secret Docs to attack Iran

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
President Trump new recording of him exhibiting the Secret Docs to attack Iran Login/Join 
One of Us
posted
https://apple.news/AuYxKIuVvSCWACRn2dDmeRA

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/0...ents-tape-audio.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/...nt-in-audio-us-media

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/0...nts-audio/index.html

Listen to the audio here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com...ding-iran-documents/

Come on Faction, defend the Greatest President in Dr. Easter’s lifetime excluding President Reagan that he often has to disagree with when President Reagan’s actual policy is posted.
 
Posts: 12581 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
How can they spin it?

Let me count the ways.

unfuckinreal.


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21769 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Aspen Hill Adventures
posted Hide Post
Why do we need to attack Iran?


~Ann





 
Posts: 19626 | Location: The LOST Nation | Registered: 27 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Because Iran trained and funded the insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq. Iran also threatens our strategic partners bring Israel and Saudi Arabia (for better and worse). Finally, Iran has threatened to close the Straights of Hormuz which is a vital shipping corridor.

Notwithstanding, the whole attempt to develop nuclear arms.
 
Posts: 12581 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
He is without a doubt the dumbest fucking human on the planet!!
 
Posts: 2662 | Registered: 25 June 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Why do we need to attack Iran?


What if we don't NEED to attack Iran? What if there are less dramatic, but effective, actions?

I'm sure you can imagine military strategists. They would certainly develop various "attack" contingency plans, just in case the NEED elevated.

You are deflecting the REAL question.


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21769 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Aspen Hill Adventures
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
Why do we need to attack Iran?


What if we don't NEED to attack Iran? What if there are less dramatic, but effective, actions?

I'm sure you can imagine military strategists. They would certainly develop various "attack" contingency plans, just in case the NEED elevated.

You are deflecting the REAL question.


Asking a question is not deflecting. Iran is for sure an enemy but where do we need to have active 'attack' plans?

Was this being projected as any sort of contingency or actual preparation for an all out attack?

I ask because our govt certainly has all sorts of 'contingency plans'. Always has.


~Ann





 
Posts: 19626 | Location: The LOST Nation | Registered: 27 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
Does an ex president generally share those plans with cronies at a country club?? coffee


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13591 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Asking a question is not deflecting.


In my view it is.

Instead:

Why did Trump have such classified doc?

Why was he waving it around, bragging?

Who were the people in attendance?

Did they have security clearance?

Who else did he show it to.

Just disclosing there is a contingency attack plan, is not that leaking?

Did he plan on selling it to the highest bidder?

Did he have it as "insurance" in case he needed to extort?

Is such a thing forbidden by law?

Is he going to be held accountable?

And so forth.


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21769 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JBrown
posted Hide Post
All of the above questions are valid. If Trump misused classified documents in a manner that compromised our security, then he is guilty of treason. If he did that, I hope that he receives the maximum sentence.


I will be interested in hearing more as the case unfolds.

But, since we will have to wait on those details, I have a question for all of you: It has been spun that the documents that Trump took were a sort of manifesto outlining how we will/are going to topple middle eastern governments in an attempt to replace them with puppet governments.

If that is truly what is in the documents, a detailed plan of neo-colonization in the the Middle East, would that make a difference in how we should view this breach?


Jason

"You're not hard-core, unless you live hard-core."
_______________________

Hunting in Africa is an adventure. The number of variables involved preclude the possibility of a perfect hunt. Some problems will arise. How you decide to handle them will determine how much you enjoy your hunt.

Just tell yourself, "it's all part of the adventure." Remember, if Robert Ruark had gotten upset every time problems with Harry
Selby's flat bed truck delayed the safari, Horn of the Hunter would have read like an indictment of Selby. But Ruark rolled with the punches, poured some gin, and enjoyed the adventure.

-Jason Brown
 
Posts: 6842 | Location: Nome, Alaska(formerly SW Wyoming) | Registered: 22 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
It’s not the first time he has done it

https://www.independent.co.uk/...uments-b2143733.html

He is more concerned about his own self aggrandisement than anything else.

How the US electorate can be so dumb as to elect such a complete moron is beyond me. Even worse is that after all that has transpired there are still people who would do so again.
 
Posts: 7429 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
Because Iran trained and funded the insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq. Iran also threatens our strategic partners bring Israel and Saudi Arabia (for better and worse). Finally, Iran has threatened to close the Straights of Hormuz which is a vital shipping corridor.

Notwithstanding, the whole attempt to develop nuclear arms.


Iran had a peaceful election.

The CIA didn’t like the results.

They removed the winner and put the Shah in!

The Shah was eventually removed, replaced by Khomeini.

The current crop of religious zealots are the remnants of Khomeini’s regime!

Practically every nasty spot in the, America had a hand in it!

And now they cannot even run their own country!

Trump or Biden?? clap


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69225 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Seems there are a lot of MAGA Misfits missing from this discussion. Where is ledvm, JTEX, Mr. Eight Figures, etc. They go quiet whenever Trump shits in their hand. They will never give up on him, they just wipe their hand off, and go quiet.......until the next time he shits in their hand.
 
Posts: 13919 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Trump is looking worse and worse.
 
Posts: 11181 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JBrown:

I will be interested in hearing more as the case unfolds.

But, since we will have to wait on those details, I have a question for all of you: It has been spun that the documents that Trump took were a sort of manifesto outlining how we will/are going to topple middle eastern governments in an attempt to replace them with puppet governments.

If that is truly what is in the documents, a detailed plan of neo-colonization in the the Middle East, would that make a difference in how we should view this breach?


That's speculation. It's akin to conspiracy theory.

In this case, it's not fun or useful to speculate, IMO.

After all, it's just one piece of evidence.

And, "any day now" the other indictment(s) by Jack Smith will hit the fan.

Plus the pending case in Georgia.

This shit-show has just begun.


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21769 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My impression is these are not some manifesto, but standard OP for being prepared in case a hostile to US interests Nation-State gets froggy.

What would be worse is Iran doing something, and then having to figure out how to respond.
 
Posts: 12581 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
Does an ex president generally share those plans with cronies at a country club?? coffee


And what nitwit let him read it in the first place?


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14730 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
Does an ex president generally share those plans with cronies at a country club?? coffee


This. Yukking it up with his golf buddies about top secret contingency plans to attack Iran so he can feel important. He's mentally ill.


-Every damn thing is your own fault if you are any good.

 
Posts: 16304 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JBrown
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
Originally posted by JBrown:

I will be interested in hearing more as the case unfolds.

But, since we will have to wait on those details, I have a question for all of you: It has been spun that the documents that Trump took were a sort of manifesto outlining how we will/are going to topple middle eastern governments in an attempt to replace them with puppet governments.

If that is truly what is in the documents, a detailed plan of neo-colonization in the the Middle East, would that make a difference in how we should view this breach?


That's speculation. It's akin to conspiracy theory.

In this case, it's not fun or useful to speculate, IMO.



I agree that it is speculation, which is why I referred to it as “spin”.

What isn’t speculation at this point? We know that Trump took top secret documents, and lied about it, tried to cover it up, but not much else.

And the claim that it the documents were simply a defensive plan are also speculation at this point. Unless you guys have read the materials??

Nothing that Trump does makes a lot of sense, unless you look at him as a narcissist/egomaniac.

So ask yourself this: what would a narcissist/egomaniac gain from showing off a defensive strategy handbook? Would that make Trump’s enemies look bad in the eyes of the American public?

But if it was some type of neocolonial manifesto detailing how we are actively manipulating the Middle East for the purpose of controlling that part of the world along with their oil…

I can see how one would serve a narcissist, but the other I can’t imagine even Trump thinking it would gain him anything other than scorn and a treason charge.

Taking top secret documents for the purpose of blackmail or whatever, is treasonous, full stop.

So my question still stands: If these documents are proof of a nefarious plan by our government to control the ME, will that affect your opinion of this whole situation?


Jason

"You're not hard-core, unless you live hard-core."
_______________________

Hunting in Africa is an adventure. The number of variables involved preclude the possibility of a perfect hunt. Some problems will arise. How you decide to handle them will determine how much you enjoy your hunt.

Just tell yourself, "it's all part of the adventure." Remember, if Robert Ruark had gotten upset every time problems with Harry
Selby's flat bed truck delayed the safari, Horn of the Hunter would have read like an indictment of Selby. But Ruark rolled with the punches, poured some gin, and enjoyed the adventure.

-Jason Brown
 
Posts: 6842 | Location: Nome, Alaska(formerly SW Wyoming) | Registered: 22 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
I really don't have a problem with Trump discussing these topics as long as it with people like Kid Rock.

https://www.independent.co.uk/...o-maps-b2355972.html
 
Posts: 9632 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
I really don't have a problem with Trump discussing these topics as long as it with people like Kid Rock.

https://www.independent.co.uk/...o-maps-b2355972.html


Right? Even Kid Rock was like WTF?

He'll probably be offered SecDef position if trump wins.


-Every damn thing is your own fault if you are any good.

 
Posts: 16304 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
I really don't have a problem with Trump discussing these topics as long as it with people like Kid Rock.

https://www.independent.co.uk/...o-maps-b2355972.html


Right? Even Kid Rock was like WTF?

He'll probably be offered SecDef position if trump wins.


Uh,...... actually I was thinking that after the reasonable and diplomatic response Kid Rock made regarding the Tranny/ Budlite controversy he'd be Trump's ambassador to the UN or Secretary of State or mebbe "Special Jack Daniel's Emissary" or something.

What?
 
Posts: 9632 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
Did I leave out, considerate and, "Choose Love"?

Sorry, I meant to say Kid Rock's considerate and, "Choose Love" response.

Shit I think that's funny. Big Grin
 
Posts: 9632 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
"We know that Trump took top secret documents"

Not my dog, not my fight but I have always read that he was found in possession of "classified" documents; never saw the words "Secret" or "Top Secret".

Granting the benefit of doubt that he was in fact found in possession of Secret and Top Secret documents, question begs:

- how he was able to gain access, Presidential status notwithstanding?
- how was he able to remove them from an area virtually inaccessible to God?
- how and why he was able to retain them for so long until after his Presidential appointment had lapsed?

The secret archives are not manned by some sidekick of a clerk but more so by some very senior and high ranking officials who will, or have to be mentioned sometime during the proceedings.
 
Posts: 2075 | Registered: 06 September 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Actually, IMO, no.

Trump was POTUS. If he objected to that plan, 1. He could order it destroyed, 2. He had declassification power and could have both openly stated his predecessors made this contingency plan and that I’m bringing into public to both announce my ordering it ended and to make sure the electorate knows that this is going on, and you need to be careful of “the swamp”…

Since he didn’t do either, it’s more logical it’s his narcissism shining through.

quote:
Originally posted by JBrown:
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
Originally posted by JBrown:

I will be interested in hearing more as the case unfolds.

But, since we will have to wait on those details, I have a question for all of you: It has been spun that the documents that Trump took were a sort of manifesto outlining how we will/are going to topple middle eastern governments in an attempt to replace them with puppet governments.

If that is truly what is in the documents, a detailed plan of neo-colonization in the the Middle East, would that make a difference in how we should view this breach?


That's speculation. It's akin to conspiracy theory.

In this case, it's not fun or useful to speculate, IMO.



I agree that it is speculation, which is why I referred to it as “spin”.

What isn’t speculation at this point? We know that Trump took top secret documents, and lied about it, tried to cover it up, but not much else.

And the claim that it the documents were simply a defensive plan are also speculation at this point. Unless you guys have read the materials??

Nothing that Trump does makes a lot of sense, unless you look at him as a narcissist/egomaniac.

So ask yourself this: what would a narcissist/egomaniac gain from showing off a defensive strategy handbook? Would that make Trump’s enemies look bad in the eyes of the American public?

But if it was some type of neocolonial manifesto detailing how we are actively manipulating the Middle East for the purpose of controlling that part of the world along with their oil…

I can see how one would serve a narcissist, but the other I can’t imagine even Trump thinking it would gain him anything other than scorn and a treason charge.

Taking top secret documents for the purpose of blackmail or whatever, is treasonous, full stop.

So my question still stands: If these documents are proof of a nefarious plan by our government to control the ME, will that affect your opinion of this whole situation?
 
Posts: 11181 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
Did I leave out, considerate and, "Choose Love"?

Sorry, I meant to say Kid Rock's considerate and, "Choose Love" response.

Shit I think that's funny. Big Grin


https://www.msn.com/en-us/food...c33e0b30f937f6&ei=53

Kid Rock Launches New Merch After Bud Light Fiasco
Story by Jamie Burton • 11h ago


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21769 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Revealed: DOJ and Director of National Intel. can't find Trump's 'standing order' to declassify docs
Story by Sarah K. Burris • 1h ago

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...c33e0b30f937f6&ei=92


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21769 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
Trump is a lying narcissist and all the bullshit excuses by his sycophants can’t change that.


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13591 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  The Political Forum    President Trump new recording of him exhibiting the Secret Docs to attack Iran

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: