quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
He continues that they are miserable people.

First, VP Harris is mother (step) to two young men.

One is female. One is male.

Buttigiea has twins (what he is dining in this conversation I have no idea except to underscore Vance’s belief gay people don’t have children).

President Washington as the article points out had no natural children. Did he not have a stake in this country.

Harris and other prominent Democrats (including Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) “don’t really have a direct stake” in the country’s future because they are “people without children.” In the clip, which has amassed more than 25 million views since it was shared Monday on X, Vance also refers to Democrats as “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices they’ve made.”
Others on the right have echoed Vance’s argument: Will Chamberlain, a conservative commentator and former Ron DeSantis staffer, posted on X on Sunday that a “really simple, underdiscussed reason why Kamala Harris shouldn’t be President” is that she has “no children.”

Good job Christian Right poster boy in showing the American people the right does not have homophobic and misogynistic views toward women.

I know, Sen. Vance does not mean what he says.

This guy is not of my culture nor community.

Y’all actually came from similar environments didn’t you? Y’all both have done well for yourselves. Good job.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...la-harris-childless/

This is not a joke, or some Twitter made up nonsense. This is the real belief of the Republican candidate for VP. The person seen as MAGA’s future king. These ideas are influenced by a pseudo Christian belief

One thing 100% for sure is that you are not the arbiter of what is or is not Christian.

whose real aim is to control others.

Control? Control comes from big government democrats who love the huge bureaucracy who’s sole job is control — regulation. But, you like regulation and embrace control — control that fits your agenda.

Statements like this are where policy is born.

quote:

Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
Is Pete Buttigieg the father of these twins? If so, who is the mother, and is she involved in the upbringing of the children? Just keepin' it real. I had a stepmother who was in no way my mother. Of course I can't really say whether or not Kamala was a real parent or not. Further, I don't really care. It has no bearing on her suitability as a presidential candidate. Nothing would make her presidential material. Bill

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
He continues that they are miserable people.

First, VP Harris is mother (step) to two young men.

One is female. One is male.

Buttigiea has twins (what he is dining in this conversation I have no idea except to underscore Vance’s belief gay people don’t have children).

President Washington as the article points out had no natural children. Did he not have a stake in this country.

Harris and other prominent Democrats (including Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) “don’t really have a direct stake” in the country’s future because they are “people without children.” In the clip, which has amassed more than 25 million views since it was shared Monday on X, Vance also refers to Democrats as “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices they’ve made.”
Others on the right have echoed Vance’s argument: Will Chamberlain, a conservative commentator and former Ron DeSantis staffer, posted on X on Sunday that a “really simple, underdiscussed reason why Kamala Harris shouldn’t be President” is that she has “no children.”

Good job Christian Right poster boy in showing the American people the right does not have homophobic and misogynistic views toward women.

I know, Sen. Vance does not mean what he says.

This guy is not of my culture nor community.

Y’all actually came from similar environments didn’t you? Y’all both have done well for yourselves. Good job.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...la-harris-childless/

This is not a joke, or some Twitter made up nonsense. This is the real belief of the Republican candidate for VP. The person seen as MAGA’s future king. These ideas are influenced by a pseudo Christian belief

One thing 100% for sure is that you are not the arbiter of what is or is not Christian.

whose real aim is to control others.

Control? Control comes from big government democrats who love the huge bureaucracy who’s sole job is control — regulation. But, you like regulation and embrace control — control that fits your agenda.

Statements like this are where policy is born.

At least you gave up on propagating that false nasty rumor about Vance that you ran from in the other thread.

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I have to admit it’s kind of amusing to see the Republicans and their geriatric wreck of a First Felon flailing around in terror.

They better hire a new Director of Childish Derogatory Name Calling - that’s about their only hope now.

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:
One aspect of what he said I completely agree with is the notion that political leaders whom decide on policy which will effect our future generations should have children.
For example, school boards made up of mostly non-parents makes zero sense.
Also, LGBTQetc. representatives sure seem to look at the world through one lense. Nearly everything they say and every cause they champion is centered on their sexuality.

It's akin to women saying that men shouldn't have any say in women's rights, well then, people without children should't be deciding on policy that affects children, right?

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
Good idea! And maybe people that have children that are bad parents shouldn't have any say on policies affecting children either. Perhaps we could set up a tribunal to decide the good parents from the bad parents. Wait, what about the couples that want and try to have children but can't? Well, I guess we shut them out too. If a childless adult acts like a child, should they get a say? Perhaps give people with more children more influence based on the number of children they have . . . scratch that the Catholics and Mormons might take over. Vance is on to something . . . not.

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:
One aspect of what he said I completely agree with is the notion that political leaders whom decide on policy which will effect our future generations should have children.
For example, school boards made up of mostly non-parents makes zero sense.
Also, LGBTQetc. representatives sure seem to look at the world through one lense. Nearly everything they say and every cause they champion is centered on their sexuality.

It's akin to women saying that men shouldn't have any say in women's rights, well then, people without children should't be deciding on policy that affects children, right?

Does this mean folks without children can stop paying taxes that pay for schools?

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:
One aspect of what he said I completely agree with is the notion that political leaders whom decide on policy which will effect our future generations should have children.
For example, school boards made up of mostly non-parents makes zero sense.
Also, LGBTQetc. representatives sure seem to look at the world through one lense. Nearly everything they say and every cause they champion is centered on their sexuality.

It's akin to women saying that men shouldn't have any say in women's rights, well then, people without children should't be deciding on policy that affects children, right?

Does this mean folks without children can stop paying taxes that pay for schools?

My statement was tongue in cheek but to your point, since the education of our young people is critical to the performance as a country - job market, technological innovation, scientific studies etc., then everybody should be paying for public education.

It's the old childless geezers that put a huge financial strain on the system. Parents at least have a hope that their adult children will help them out in their old age.

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:
One aspect of what he said I completely agree with is the notion that political leaders whom decide on policy which will effect our future generations should have children.
For example, school boards made up of mostly non-parents makes zero sense.
Also, LGBTQetc. representatives sure seem to look at the world through one lense. Nearly everything they say and every cause they champion is centered on their sexuality.

It's akin to women saying that men shouldn't have any say in women's rights, well then, people without children should't be deciding on policy that affects children, right?

Does this mean folks without children can stop paying taxes that pay for schools?

My statement was tongue in cheek but to your point, since the education of our young people is critical to the performance as a country - job market, technological innovation, scientific studies etc., then everybody should be paying for public education.

It's the old childless geezers that put a huge financial strain on the system. Parents at least have a hope that their adult children will help them out in their old age.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
He continues that they are miserable people.

First, VP Harris is mother (step) to two young men.

One is female. One is male.

Buttigiea has twins (what he is dining in this conversation I have no idea except to underscore Vance’s belief gay people don’t have children).

President Washington as the article points out had no natural children. Did he not have a stake in this country.

Harris and other prominent Democrats (including Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) “don’t really have a direct stake” in the country’s future because they are “people without children.” In the clip, which has amassed more than 25 million views since it was shared Monday on X, Vance also refers to Democrats as “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices they’ve made.”
Others on the right have echoed Vance’s argument: Will Chamberlain, a conservative commentator and former Ron DeSantis staffer, posted on X on Sunday that a “really simple, underdiscussed reason why Kamala Harris shouldn’t be President” is that she has “no children.”

Good job Christian Right poster boy in showing the American people the right does not have homophobic and misogynistic views toward women.

I know, Sen. Vance does not mean what he says.

This guy is not of my culture nor community.

Y’all actually came from similar environments didn’t you? Y’all both have done well for yourselves. Good job.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...la-harris-childless/

This is not a joke, or some Twitter made up nonsense. This is the real belief of the Republican candidate for VP. The person seen as MAGA’s future king. These ideas are influenced by a pseudo Christian belief

One thing 100% for sure is that you are not the arbiter of what is or is not Christian.

whose real aim is to control others.

Control? Control comes from big government democrats who love the huge bureaucracy who’s sole job is control — regulation. But, you like regulation and embrace control — control that fits your agenda.

Statements like this are where policy is born.

At least you gave up on propagating that false nasty rumor about Vance that you ran from in the other thread.

You are not worth responding to anymore.

Your attempt to defend this is its own rebuke.

Yes, I joked that at least the coach was not gsy.

Why, it illustrates the torso disconnect people like you have.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

This election, if nothing else, has definitely sorted conservative traditionalists from the liberal progressives.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
I Reagan were alive today…he would be wearing a Red MAGA ball cap. I hope he would rethink his s position on mental institutions however.

quote:

I would love it we went back to teaching critical thinking in our schools as they did in our days.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

I would love it we went back to teaching critical thinking in our schools as they did in our days.

Too bad the lessons didn't take.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
See what I mean?

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
. . . be patient Roland. Folks like Hasher come along from time to time here. They are prolific posters numerically over a relatively short period (of course, based on substance the volume of content is infinitesimal). They also tend to flame out in short order. Give the fellow a little time to wear himself out. I am sure he is quite pleased with himself.

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
. . . be patient Roland. Folks like Hasher come along from time to time here. They are prolific posters numerically over a relatively short period (of course, based on substance the volume of content is infinitesimal). They also tend to flame out in short order. Give the fellow a little time to wear himself out. I am sure he is quite pleased with himself.

Let’s review shall we???

I have been here and averaged about 100 posts a year.

Vagina Tue leader if this band if meditation flying monkeys has averaged just u fee 3000 posts a year.

So yea I’ll be around.


Hugs and kisses.

PS at least you do post some I teretinf and valid content.

quote:

Vagina Tue leader if this band if meditation flying monkeys has averaged just u fee 3000 posts a year.

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
See what I mean?

I do see.


Your educational failings are quite saddening.


Just another leftist parrot.


Give us some original thought other than “Orange man BAD must stop at all costs.”

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
See what I mean?

I do see.


Your educational failings are quite saddening.


Just another leftist parrot.


Give us some original thought other than “Orange man BAD must stop at all costs.”

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
I Reagan were alive today…he would be wearing a Red MAGA ball cap. I hope he would rethink his s position on mental institutions however.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
I Reagan were alive today…he would be wearing a Red MAGA ball cap. I hope he would rethink his s position on mental institutions however.

That is an idiotic statement.

Ronald Reagan would have been revolted by trump's behavior both before, after and during his presidency. I can just see Reagan wearing a MAGA hat and applauding what happened on J6. What utter nonsense.

Have you been hitting the bong with Hasher?

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
. . . be patient Roland. Folks like Hasher come along from time to time here. They are prolific posters numerically over a relatively short period (of course, based on substance the volume of content is infinitesimal). They also tend to flame out in short order. Give the fellow a little time to wear himself out. I am sure he is quite pleased with himself.

Let’s review shall we???

I have been here and averaged about 100 posts a year.

Vagina Tue leader if this band if meditation flying monkeys has averaged just u fee 3000 posts a year.

So yea I’ll be around.


Hugs and kisses.

PS at least you do post some I teretinf and valid content.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
I Reagan were alive today…he would be wearing a Red MAGA ball cap. I hope he would rethink his s position on mental institutions however.

That is an idiotic statement.

Ronald Reagan would have been revolted by trump's behavior both before, after and during his presidency. I can just see Reagan wearing a MAGA hat and applauding what happened on J6. What utter nonsense.

Have you been hitting the bong with Hasher?

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
I Reagan were alive today…he would be wearing a Red MAGA ball cap. I hope he would rethink his s position on mental institutions however.

That is an idiotic statement.

Ronald Reagan would have been revolted by trump's behavior both before, after and during his presidency. I can just see Reagan wearing a MAGA hat and applauding what happened on J6. What utter nonsense.

Have you been hitting the bong with Hasher?

You as a Democrat have no concept of Reagan philosophy.

But then again you are a Democrat — very little realistic concept of anything.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
I Reagan were alive today…he would be wearing a Red MAGA ball cap. I hope he would rethink his s position on mental institutions however.

That is an idiotic statement.

Ronald Reagan would have been revolted by trump's behavior both before, after and during his presidency. I can just see Reagan wearing a MAGA hat and applauding what happened on J6. What utter nonsense.

Have you been hitting the bong with Hasher?

You as a Democrat have no concept of Reagan philosophy.

But then again you are a Democrat — very little realistic concept of anything.

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
I Reagan were alive today…he would be wearing a Red MAGA ball cap. I hope he would rethink his s position on mental institutions however.

That is an idiotic statement.

Ronald Reagan would have been revolted by trump's behavior both before, after and during his presidency. I can just see Reagan wearing a MAGA hat and applauding what happened on J6. What utter nonsense.

Have you been hitting the bong with Hasher?

You as a Democrat have no concept of Reagan philosophy.

But then again you are a Democrat — very little realistic concept of anything.

I’ve voted Republican for almost 60 years, right up until 3 1/2 years ago, so I think I have a pretty good idea of what the Republican Party stood for- up until 3 1/2 years ago. Now it’s an orange cult led my a narcissist out for his own power trip. As a somewhat devout Christian, now I’m an independent. “Grab ‘em by the pussy” orange jesus isn’t my idea of a Christian, regardless of his “policies”…….