THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Guess Who Can't Come Up With His Bond? Login/Join 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wymple:
quote:
My best guess though is that the judge reduces this. i will say 100 million.


Why should HE get a break? You nor I would.

not talking about should. id bet a bottle of bourbon though that im not wrong.
 
Posts: 483 | Registered: 07 May 2018Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wymple:
quote:
My best guess though is that the judge reduces this. i will say 100 million.


Why should HE get a break? You nor I would.


Because he is the orange messiah and he so picked on and abused!
 
Posts: 662 | Location: SW Montana | Registered: 28 December 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by lavaca:
I've got a silly question. Being a defense lawyer, I've faced situations where a client with an adverse verdict couldn't post a supersedeas bond for whatever reason. That doesn't deny the defendant the right to appeal, it only means that the plaintiff can go ahead and execute and start to take assets. I've told plaintiffs to do so at their own peril because if the judgment is reversed, well, what goes around comes around.


Yeah, this is exactly correct. The state of NY executes on any trump assets at their own peril. If they garnish his bank accounts or execute on his properties and the judgment is reversed in 2 or 3 years, they could potentially end up owing Broke Don a lot of money.


-Every damn thing is your own fault if you are any good.

 
Posts: 16358 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
quote:
Originally posted by lavaca:
I've got a silly question. Being a defense lawyer, I've faced situations where a client with an adverse verdict couldn't post a supersedeas bond for whatever reason. That doesn't deny the defendant the right to appeal, it only means that the plaintiff can go ahead and execute and start to take assets. I've told plaintiffs to do so at their own peril because if the judgment is reversed, well, what goes around comes around.


Yeah, this is exactly correct. The state of NY executes on any trump assets at their own peril. If they garnish his bank accounts or execute on his properties and the judgment is reversed in 2 or 3 years, they could potentially end up owing Broke Don a lot of money.


They don't have to do anything but place perfectly legal liens on his property.

It's not the State's fault that the mortgage holders would almost certainly call the loans on those properties, which Trump can't cover without selling some submarine documents and the odds he's under an active FISA warrant for just that possibility are pretty good.

When the lenders take and sell the properties they, of course, get the first bite at the apple. If the sale realizes more than the outstanding debt then the State gets their cut.

If there was anything left then Little Donnie would presumably get it...

The problem for the Mango Mussolini is that after the outstanding loans are satisfied his entire empire won't generate what he owes New York.

Since "Delay, Delay, Delay" has been his legal strategy his entire adult life I wouldn't be surprised by a bankruptcy filing first thing Monday morning.


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11175 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MtElkHunter:
quote:
Originally posted by wymple:
quote:
My best guess though is that the judge reduces this. i will say 100 million.


Why should HE get a break? You nor I would.


Because he is the orange messiah and he so picked on and abused!


He's a BINO, Billionaire In Name Only.


Give me a home where the buffalo roam and I'll show you a house full of buffalo shit.
 
Posts: 1759 | Location: IOWA | Registered: 27 October 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by zebrazapper:
quote:
Originally posted by wymple:
quote:
My best guess though is that the judge reduces this. i will say 100 million.


Why should HE get a break? You nor I would.

not talking about should. id bet a bottle of bourbon though that im not wrong.

Looks like I missed by 70 million but wasnt too far off.
 
Posts: 483 | Registered: 07 May 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
yep.
now he's down there with people that actually stole stuff and ripped of actual victims.
 
Posts: 5018 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
By the time he is able to sell them his truth social/djt shares won't be worth enough to pay his current $454 million debt.


Give me a home where the buffalo roam and I'll show you a house full of buffalo shit.
 
Posts: 1759 | Location: IOWA | Registered: 27 October 2018Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: