The Accurate Reloading Forums
House dems overwhelmed reject anti riot resolution
28 June 2025, 02:13
jeffeossoHouse dems overwhelmed reject anti riot resolution
Nearly 200 house dems reject house resolution condemning riots riots in LA. LA DA said criminals used protests cover to commit widespread looting and assaulting LEOs
28 June 2025, 03:18
Mike MitchellI'm gonna take a wild guess and say that the republicans threw some other shit into the resolution besides just condemning rioters.
Jeff, my friend....nobody is in favor of rioting or assaulting police officers. Well, maybe those J6 bros of yours....but, only if it's in connection with trying to change the result of a general election through violence and taking over the Capital. And, only if they're gonna get a pardon from your President after engaging in sedition.

28 June 2025, 03:25
jeffeossoNearly 200 dems voted against it Mike. Here is the text. I don't see anything unfactual in it. Couldn't imagine someone voting against it
https://www.congress.gov/bill/...-resolution/516/text28 June 2025, 03:32
medvedquote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
I'm gonna take a wild guess and say that the republicans threw some other shit into the resolution besides just condemning rioters.
Jeff, my friend....nobody is in favor of rioting or assaulting police officers. Well, maybe those J6 bros of yours....but, only if it's in connection with trying to change the result of a general election through violence and taking over the Capital. And, only if they're gonna get a pardon from your President after engaging in sedition.
jan 6 was different it was to save the republic ...
28 June 2025, 03:44
Mike Mitchellquote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Nearly 200 dems voted against it Mike. Here is the text. I don't see anything unfactual in it. Couldn't imagine someone voting against it
https://www.congress.gov/bill/...-resolution/516/text
I dunno man. I'm guessing it's because the resolution included condemnation of Newsome based on what I'm seeing in the reporting. The republicans had to add something political and since Newsome is almost certainly going to run for POTUS, no Dem is going to vote in favor.
No judgment here one way or the other but the resolution was political in nature and designed to be something the GOP could use against Newsome in the future.
28 June 2025, 04:07
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Nearly 200 dems voted against it Mike. Here is the text. I don't see anything unfactual in it. Couldn't imagine someone voting against it
https://www.congress.gov/bill/...-resolution/516/text
I dunno man. I'm guessing it's because the resolution included condemnation of Newsome based on what I'm seeing in the reporting. The republicans had to add something political and since Newsome is almost certainly going to run for POTUS, no Dem is going to vote in favor.
No judgment here one way or the other but the resolution was political in nature and designed to be something the GOP could use against Newsome in the future.
so.. party over country -- and rule of law -- about par, i'd say
28 June 2025, 04:25
Steve Bertramquote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Nearly 200 dems voted against it Mike. Here is the text. I don't see anything unfactual in it. Couldn't imagine someone voting against it
https://www.congress.gov/bill/...-resolution/516/text
I dunno man. I'm guessing it's because the resolution included condemnation of Newsome based on what I'm seeing in the reporting. The republicans had to add something political and since Newsome is almost certainly going to run for POTUS, no Dem is going to vote in favor.
No judgment here one way or the other but the resolution was political in nature and designed to be something the GOP could use against Newsome in the future.
so.. party over country -- and rule of law -- about par, i'd say
Oh Honey, the irony is just dripping

You of all people.....party over country

Why, that is almost as ironic as starting a thread about how only mental midgets believe that tariffs are taxes

One SNL moment after another little big man, you are a gift that keeps on giving

28 June 2025, 04:31
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Nearly 200 dems voted against it Mike. Here is the text. I don't see anything unfactual in it. Couldn't imagine someone voting against it
https://www.congress.gov/bill/...-resolution/516/text
I dunno man. I'm guessing it's because the resolution included condemnation of Newsome based on what I'm seeing in the reporting. The republicans had to add something political and since Newsome is almost certainly going to run for POTUS, no Dem is going to vote in favor.
No judgment here one way or the other but the resolution was political in nature and designed to be something the GOP could use against Newsome in the future.
so.. party over country -- and rule of law -- about par, i'd say
Oh Honey, the irony is just dripping

You of all people.....party over country

Why, that is almost as ironic as starting a thread about how only mental midgets believe that tariffs are taxes

One SNL moment after another little big man, you are a gift that keeps on giving
Did you get your assigned tasks completed yet?
28 June 2025, 04:35
Steve Bertramquote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Did you get your assigned tasks completed yet?
Honey, you couldn't order take out at McDonald's, let alone me to do tasks.

28 June 2025, 04:37
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Did you get your assigned tasks completed yet?
Honey, you couldn't order take out at McDonald's, let alone me to do tasks.
And yet your ENTIRE business model is taking orders, the irony is funny every time.
Did you get your assigned tasks done yet, or still failing like in 4 different schools?
28 June 2025, 04:38
jeffeossoThat you take the bait EVERY TIME is hysterical
28 June 2025, 04:42
Steve Bertramquote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
And yet your ENTIRE business model is taking orders, the irony is funny every time.
Did you get your assigned tasks done yet, or still failing like in 4 different schools?
Oh Honey, I don't take orders in my business, on the contrary, my clients request services from me. I may or may not chose to indulge them.
You know little big man, just because you repeat a lie about me does not make it true.
Such a small, small man Jeffe....pathetic really.
28 June 2025, 04:43
Steve Bertramquote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
That you take the bait EVERY TIME is hysterical
Somebody took the bait, how is that bully stick Daisy?

28 June 2025, 04:59
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
That you take the bait EVERY TIME is hysterical
Somebody took the bait, how is that bully stick Daisy?

28 June 2025, 05:32
Steve BertramI can add a bully stick to your shipment of cookies and Kool-Aid if you like

28 June 2025, 05:54
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
I can add a bully stick to your shipment of cookies and Kool-Aid if you like
that's okay, shopkeep -- *I* don't need to beg strangers off the internet for food and support ..

28 June 2025, 05:59
Steve Bertramquote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
I can add a bully stick to your shipment of cookies and Kool-Aid if you like
that's okay, shopkeep -- *I* don't need to beg strangers off the internet for food and support ..
Bwahahaha....still lying and still a very, very small man.
You might beg Honey, I don't, nor have I ever needed to. My services are in far greater need than I care to supply.
Unlike you, I'm quite successful at being self-employed.

29 June 2025, 00:37
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
I can add a bully stick to your shipment of cookies and Kool-Aid if you like
that's okay, shopkeep -- *I* don't need to beg strangers off the internet for food and support ..
Bwahahaha....still lying and still a very, very small man.
You might beg Honey, I don't, nor have I ever needed to. My services are in far greater need than I care to supply.
Unlike you, I'm quite successful at being self-employed.
aww, sweetie.. happy for you .. if you feel you've made it, that's AWESOME for you - good for you -- you have, in your own mind, won/made it - that's amazing- keep up the good work. after all you've been through and personal abject failures, you deserve a win in your life.
You are correct, i earn, adjusted for inflation, FAR more than I did at being self-employed - even my passive income in the last decade or so is higher than i ever earned as "self-employed" - heck, i even earn more than when i owned, operated, and sold off a company or two -- but comparison is the death of contentment, so don't you worry your little shopkeeper head about others -
You do you, I wish you all the best, try to stay healthy, I'd hate to hear you went on the dole due to an illness