Except when you have Emily Kohrs as your foreperson.

She seems seriously disturbed if not insane.

So there goes the seriousness and reputation of any Grand Jury from now on.

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:
Except when you have Emily Kohrs as your foreperson.

She seems seriously disturbed if not insane.

So there goes the seriousness and reputation of any Grand Jury from now on.

Modern America.

The senseless, stupid, freaks are in charge!

Peers?

Her peers are bait fish!

Not humans!


Another perfect example!

Grand jury testimony, findings, proceedings, etc are supposedly sealed and secret. It will be interesting to see if she faces legal repercussions. And yes, she came across as an airhead…..

Incredibly stupid for her to start talking to reporters before the indictments are handed down. It may provide a basis to quash the indictments.

I think I have finally figured out why Saeed spends all his time here insulting Americans: he can't do it in his own country:

https://www.brecorder.com/news/464603

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:
Except when you have Emily Kohrs as your foreperson.

She seems seriously disturbed if not insane.

So there goes the seriousness and reputation of any Grand Jury from now on.

Modern America.

The senseless, stupid, freaks are in charge!

Peers?

Her peers are bait fish!

Not humans!


Another perfect example!

What legal grounds would be involved? I understand it's not right to talk about it, but what does it change?

I don't think what she did was illegal but that depends on what the judge told the grand jurors they could publicly say about the process when the grand jury was disbanded. It's just not smart especially when she comes off like an airhead and says stupid shit like "It's not rocket science"....

I don't think it will have any practical effect. The GJ process is done. Next move is up to the DA's office to determine if they want to charge based on the GJ findings. It seems clear from the statements she made that Trump is going to be charged.

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
What legal grounds would be involved? I understand it's not right to talk about it, but what does it change?

This comment from a retired attorney elsewhere.

""I think the bigger concern is what the Georgia legislature will do to try to handicap the prosecution.""

When you don't care what vile anti American shit spews out of MTG's mouth, why do you care about this?

We were admonished by the judge to not speak about the findings until all legal proceedings were complete.