One of Us
| Not my game . But I would think, to stay within weight limits, shorter and fatter would tend to be more accurate than thinner and longer. I am interested in what the benchrest crowd will say on this.
.
|
| Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| No creedmore ever built will take on a PPC or BR...none ! Varmint gun is fine but never purebenchrest, to believe so would be as delusional as Dumpster... |
| |
One of Us
| I own a 6BR in a Eliseo tube gun. Extremely accurate, but it along with any other 6mm BR or PPC will never beat a 6mm Creedmoor in the competition discussed (hunter benchrest) in the original post.
Not enough case capacity in either to qualify.
Twenty-two inch barrel should be fine. |
| |
One of Us
| He states 100-200 yards and some a little longer ????? And you think a 6 creedmore will out shoot a PPC or BR at those distances, that would never happen...you stated you own a BR and you think a creedmore is better in the accuracy game ?? Never at those distances even with a six power scope, I'd have seen a lot of bench rest matches and can't remember ever seeing a creedmore that could compete with either cartridge, especially at100-200. |
| |
One of Us
| Read the competition he is shooting. Hunter Benchrest. Requires 45 grains of H2O capacity. Neither of the smaller cartridges qualify, which was my point if you read my entire post. Also the question was about barrel length. |
| |
One of Us
| Why did they put the 45,0 grain minimum.....because they can'tbe compeditive with the PPC/BR... |
| |