THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BULLETMAKING FORUM


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Bullet swaging
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted
Hmm... Maybe bullets are like operating systems, the only good ones are those you make yourself... [Big Grin]

I think maybe I need to sink further down into the reloading quagmire [Big Grin] . Therefore, I have a few questions about bullet swaging.

1) How good bullets can you make? Both from an accuracy and terminal ballistics performance.

2) What equipment do you need to get going? Cost?

3) Any good web references?

4) What time does one spend to make, say... 100... SP bullets in .30 with awesome accuracy, reliable big-game terminal ballistics, and world-class exterior ballistics [Wink] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] ?

Regards,
/HerrBerg
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
HerrBerg
I swage pistol bullets occasionally, 45 acp. 45 Colt, 357. I use Corbin's basegard system since I found out knurling bullets is a real boar/bore.
I know several fellows who swage their own bullets for bench rest shooting, 6mm. They can put most all their bullets in the same hole all day long, everytime.
From what I've seen of these fellows as they make their bullets, hospital ORs are filthy by comparison, imagine a clinical anal retenitive on Ritlin. Focused does not describe these fellows.
Everything is done exactly the same everytime, including the time the core is in the die being swaged to size and weight, the same goes for the time the core is swaged into the jacket. The jackets are weighed, the bullets like wise.
The cores are washed after swaging to size, to remove the lube so that there's none left when the core is seated in the jacket.
Dave Corbin has written 5 or 6 books on the subject.
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
HerrBerg: I bet writing one's own operating system is not cost effective either, but it may be most satisfying. Sorry to say it is probably not cost effective to swage a 'world class' most accurate nor most terminally effective bullet either. A lot of technically savvy people, with capital to invest, make some pretty sophisticated commercial bullets. The point is, it is not a trivial effort or expense to do so. But this is not to say a dedicated person can not exceed their efforts and if they manage to do so, and they can, it is pretty technically satisfying too. How do you think the commercial folks got to where they are?
Good web resources are: RCE and Corbin , search the web for others.
I would not approach swaging with an eye to economy unless one is contemplating some exotic calibers where commercial swaggers charge multiple dollars per bullet, however I would say it is a most satisfying way to explore what is possible in ways that commercial folks can not justify. Justify this pastime with fun and one can produce what none others can. Don't get me wrong, one can produce cheep too, if one uses range pick up cartridge case for jackets and range scrap lead for the cores then bullets can be made cost free as far as material cost. It does depend on how one wants to amortize the cost of equipment and one's time.
 
Posts: 138 | Location: Hubbell, Michigan, USA | Registered: 05 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted Hide Post
Well, looking at the prices for the equipment, I'm fully aware that I could buy a lifetime's supply of premium bullets.

But the problem is that there is a "treehugger's party" in Sweden with some 5% votes and in a political... conspiracy... a lead ban was traded for political support in another area.

So, from 2006 we either swage our own bullets, or we smuggle them. Or we use Lapua or BX lead-free bullets. I thought the swaging issue should be considered somewhat.

But doesn't anyone have answers to question 2 and 4 above?

Regards,
/HerrBerg
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
HerrBerg please check out this link.
http://www.corbins.com/

There may be others but I have some familiarity with this one.

As you already know, making your own jacketed bullets is not the most cost effective way to go. But in your case with the ban on lead bullets this may not be true.

At any rate, it's a fun hobby in itself and not hard to do at all. Nor does it really take a lot of equipment. Corbin will try to sell a lot more than you need. All that is really required is a good strong press. An RCBS Rock Chucker, for example, should do nicely. In fact, the RCBS Jr. would probably work ok.

Then all you need are the forming dies and some jacket cups. I don't know if you can get lead wire or not. I used a lead core mould and cast all my bullet cores. This adds certain advantages for the bullet maker, but also adds some extra time and steps.

Still, as I say, it's fun and satisfying. I can't imagine that build excellent .30 cal bullets would be difficult for you. In fact you could probably sell your handiwork to other bullet starved citizens....and then whenever you get tired or making bullets, sell the equipment for about what you have in it.

You WON'T need the cannarule tool etc. Like I say, be careful of all the crap Corbin will try to peddle in the deal.

Ask more if I can help.
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
HerrBerg
Depending on the caliber you wish to swage bullets for..............
You may wish to come up with some bullet molds and cast your own. Start scrounging lead now and you may be able to lay in a lifetime supply.
Keep in mind that it's citizen's obligation and duty to ignor and subvert all unjust, stupid, silly, moronic laws.
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted Hide Post
Arkypete,
I had no intention of following that law. Coming to think of it, I cannot recall it even crossed my mind [Big Grin]

Pecos45,
thanks! This is yet just at the elaboration stage, but it was actually your "rocket shape" thread that made me think of this... I'll keep you informed if, or rather when, I move forward in this. Living a life without ever killing a moose with a handcrafted bullet seems like such a waste.... [Cool]

Regards,
/HerrBerg
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Herrberg - I predict great success for you. Do you have a source for lead? Luckily for swagged bullets the softer lead works the best and this is usually more available than harder alloys. Most any form of plumbing lead is very soft.

I think you'll have fun with this project.
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted Hide Post
Tire shops have to pay to get rid of their lead, so that'll be no problems.

But, Pecos, if you would assemble a kit for me, what would it look like? I have a RockChucker press today I use for reloading and tire weight lead in abundance. A good start, maybe? Calibre would be .30 and .224 to start with, but possibly 7mm also.

Regards,
/HerrBerg
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Berg - I'll get back to you on this with a shopping list.
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
HerrBerg
The Rockchucker won't do the job. Get Corbin's CSP-1 press. This press will handle any swaging job you come up with aa be converted to ammo reloading.
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Herrberg - Check your hotmail account for email.
jim
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by HerrBerg:
[QB]Tire shops have to pay to get rid of their lead, so that'll be no problems.

Wheel weights are not suitable for cores, too hard.
 
Posts: 813 | Location: Left Coast | Registered: 02 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted Hide Post
Is it possible to fix them in some way? By adding tin or something?
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Only way to soften 'em up is to add lots of pure lead. You can sometimes find stuff like lead X-ray shielding sheets, roofing lead, etc. at scrap metal dealers. That stuff's very soft.
 
Posts: 424 | Location: Bristol, Tennessee, USA | Registered: 28 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Lay wheelweights in anyway. You can't swage them but you can cast them and you can swap them to casters for pure lead.

Any banned material goes drastically up in value. Hoard any lead alloy you can get your hands on and worry about how to use it later.

For pure scrap lead, your best shot is a marine salvage yard if you have one handy.
 
Posts: 1570 | Location: Base of the Blue Ridge | Registered: 04 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Hobie
posted Hide Post
You can also reduce wheel weights to very close to pure lead in the furnace OR (perhaps somebody can jump in here) with electrical plating technology. Remember, anything is possible if you have the desire, time and money.
 
Posts: 2324 | Location: Staunton, VA | Registered: 05 September 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by scot:
Wheel weights are not suitable for cores, too hard.

I wish someone had told me about this before I cast all those wheel weight cores and made bullets out of them. [Eek!] I've shot several hundred .224 caliber bullets with wheel weight cores and never had any sort of problem. [Confused] [Confused]

Yeah, it's probably written somewhere on a sacred tablet that bullet cores should be pure lead, but the reality is it don't make a hoot in hell. You MIGHT notice a slight increase pressure on the press, depending on your type press.

Swagging bullets doesn't take near the power a lot of outfits claim it does. Keep in mind they would really just like to sell you a few hundred dollars worth of needless stuff to clutter your loading area a little worse.

[ 11-21-2003, 06:45: Message edited by: Pecos45 ]
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Pecos, you ever tried swaging WW for anything big?

I don't claim to know nothing 'bout this stuff, but it seems to me that you could get by with stuff on a .22 core that you could not on .30 cal and bigger. And .458s would be a whole 'nuther story.
 
Posts: 1570 | Location: Base of the Blue Ridge | Registered: 04 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Swede44mag
posted Hide Post
�arkypete I swage pistol bullets occasionally, 45 acp. 45 Colt, 357. I use Corbin's basegard system since I found out knurling bullets is a real boar/bore.�

I bought a Corbin swedge press and the dies and core mold to make the 44cal base guard bullets Corbin said was so good. [Roll Eyes] These were suppose to remove the lead as you shoot the gun. I have never shot any bullets that lead the gun so badly in my life. [Eek!] I finally bought another base punch that was flat. This way I can swedge a SWC or RN with a gas check for my muzzleloader. This fits a sabot and is a lot cheaper that buying soft lead bullets. [Big Grin] I have learned the hard/expensive way not to believe every thing I read.
Swede44mag
 
Posts: 1608 | Location: Central, Kansas | Registered: 15 January 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Leftoverdj:
Pecos, you ever tried swaging WW for anything big?

I don't claim to know nothing 'bout this stuff, but it seems to me that you could get by with stuff on a .22 core that you could not on .30 cal and bigger. And .458s would be a whole 'nuther story.

LDJ - Fair question, sir, and the answer is "no." My personal bullet swagging history has to do with 22 caliber projectiles only.

HOWEVER, Perhaps I should explain my technique. There are basically TWO parts to making a jacketed bullet.
1. You "seat" a lead core in the jacket cup.
[quote
And let me stop here to say that at this point you have basically made a "bullet" or at least a projectile.[/quote]

2. In step two you run this "bullet" up into a point forming die which simply shapes the point of the jacket into the desired bullet shape and the remainder of the die insures the bullet is not over the proper diameter.

Corbin uses a press and more of his dies to seat his bullet cores in the jacket cup.

I don't. I have a small block of steel with holes slightly oversized drilled into it. I drop the empty jacket cups into the holes and on my next pass I drop the lead cores I am using into the cups.....whether the lead is "pure" or alloyed.

My next step is to take a blunt punch that has been machined to fit just INSIDE the jacket cup. I place this punch on top of the core and hit it with a hammer. The hammer blow on the punch naturally seats the core into the cup the same as Corbin's extra dies and presses. After you have seated a few cores with the hammer and punch method, you get very good at the FEEL of the hole process. There is a certain sound and feel to it when the core is seated properly. It usually takes two taps with the hammer. The first blow is fairly hard and the second is quite soft.....just the mushy "feel" blow as you make sure the core is fully seated.

Then I take this product and go to my press where I run it up into my point forming die and finish out the bullet.

Can I tell the diffference when working with pure lead and alloyed lead. Yes. I can feel it in both steps. But it is a small difference.

The only part where this is of any significance is when we run the unshaped bullet into the forming die. SEATING the core in my steel plate and punch method is GOING TO HAPPEN. My hammer guarantees it. [Big Grin] (And we are talking MINOR hammer blows.....about the force you would use to seat a carpet tack.)

So if we think about it, i.e. what we are actually sizing and shaping in our press, it is actually very small Compare shaping the point on a 1/4 - 1/2" long bullet as compared to depriming and full length sizing a 30/06 case. Forming the bullet is child's work.

Now, would the forces increase as the size and diameter of the bullet increases. Sure.....it's got to! Would it increase significantly if alloyed bullet cores were used? I doubt it VERY seriously.

Possibly building big .45 bore bullets it could be an issue. I haven't done that. But for the smaller bullets, I'm convinced it is not.

JMHO

Now, some devotees may scream that my methods are crude. Corbin certainly would! It would put half his products in the waste bin. [Wink]

But my bullets worked superbly and I shot them if rifles from a 22 KHornet up to a 220 Swift.
Accuracy. I could do under MOA at 100yds without a problem. Could $1,000 worth of Corbin dies and presses build a better bullet? For hunting, NO. Could his bullets possibly be more accurate? Don't know. Don't care. My bullets were MORE than fine for what I used them for.

Maybe all this is just the pragmatist in me, but I believe in keeping things as simple. [Smile] And all I can testify to with certainty is my limited but personal experience with one caliber.
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm told you need a hefty press to make big or hard bullets. I wonder whether you could fire-form them.

What if you set up a barrel to fire a core of lead or copper into a die? You could start with light charges and work up the forming load until the die filled but did not break. If you wanted to, I guess you could keep going until you discovered the other edge of the safety margin.

H. C.
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted Hide Post
[Big Grin] (I think [Confused] )
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Pecos, I admire your ingenuity and your methods are not that far off the way swaging started.

(Anyone else remember Kipling's "hammered slug from a thirty rupee jeshial"?)

But two things stick out in my memory. One is that when you double the diameter to which a force is to be applied you square the amount of force that must be applied to get the same pressure in psi.

Second is that Ned Roberts recounts a story that H.M. Pope told him about shattering a six inch diameter swaging die while trying to swage bullets from a lead tin alloy MUCH softer than WW.
It's in "The Muzzleloading Caplock Rifle" if memory serves.
 
Posts: 1570 | Location: Base of the Blue Ridge | Registered: 04 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
Herr berg
Would you like a photo of some pistol bullets swaged out of wheel weights?
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted Hide Post
I want pictures of ANY bullet swaged, including equipment etc etc etc [Smile] !

/HerrBerg
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
LeftOver - I wish I could do some experimenting with the larger calibers but I don't have the equipment. [Frown] One thing that is EXTREMELY critical with bullet swagging is the lube.

Corbin sells little bottles of "draw die lube" specially made for swagging. It was good but another very odd lubricant I used most often was anhydrous lanolin. Pure unadulterated anhydrous lanolin is the most incredible case and swagging lubricant I ever found. Sells like a goat's butt and works like a dream. Makes your fingers soft while you work with it too. The more I loaded, the softer my hands got. [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
Pecos
I made my own swaging lube out of lanolin and I think, caster oil, 50/50. You are right the stuff smelled. A small amount lasts forever.
I wonder if the petro derivitives would diesel under the pressures generated by the swaging process.
Jim

[ 11-24-2003, 16:51: Message edited by: arkypete ]
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted Hide Post
Damn it Atrkypete, no go post them images of wheelweight buillets!!!

[Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
Herr Berg
I will get out to the loading shed this evening. I've got to open my business for a short day then come home and bake bread for the local volunteer fireman's Thanksgiving dinner, this evening.
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HerrBerg
posted Hide Post
OK, I'll give you the day off... [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by HerrBerg:
I want pictures of ANY bullet swaged, including equipment etc etc etc [Smile] !
/HerrBerg

Herr Berg,
My bullets...
Paper patched bullets
Experimental bullet
 
Posts: 2257 | Location: Where I've bought resident tags:MN, WI, IL, MI, KS, GA, AZ, IA | Registered: 30 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
HerrBerg
[IMG]http://[url= http://"http://www.hunt101.com/?p=74039&c=556&z=1"]  - [/url][/IMG]

 -
This particular die is for 45 acp SWC, the stem with the small dimple in the center is for making the Basegard bullet, a copper washer rivited to the base. the loaded ammo is the base gard, tje cast bullet is from the same pot of wheel weight alloy.
Jim

[ 11-25-2003, 16:17: Message edited by: arkypete ]
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Pecos, I got what looks to be a lifetime supply of destinked lanolin off Felix from the remains of the big melt. You might check with him to see if he has any more he wants to sell.
 
Posts: 1570 | Location: Base of the Blue Ridge | Registered: 04 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Swede44mag
posted Hide Post
"arkypete" I tried the baseguard with pure lead like corbin said it leaded up my 44mag terrible. [Eek!] I didn't know you could do it with wheel-weights doesn't this strain the die a lot? This might be worth checking into since I already have the corbin dies and press.

Swede44mag
 
Posts: 1608 | Location: Central, Kansas | Registered: 15 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
Swede44mag
I took Corbin at his word, that I could swage bullets out of wheel weights. I have diluted the wheel weights with pure lead to find out just how much that eased the swaging. It makes the job a good bit easier and when I get going again I'll dilute the wheel weights with 30% pure lead and a bit of tin.
Another thing that's different, my dies are a bit larger in diameter then normal .4525 for the 45acp. I get zero leading in the Colt Gold Cup nor in the S&W mod 25.

If you take a look at the loaded round, to the right of the press, you'll see a bit of a ridge near the center of the case. The bullets in the loaded rounds are the Basegard bullets. With the reduced diameter of the case expander and the increased diameter of the bullet I get line where the bottom of the bullet is.
Jim

[ 11-27-2003, 02:58: Message edited by: arkypete ]
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Swede44mag
posted Hide Post
"arkypete" Did you knurl your bullets and then use lube like liquid alox? This is what it looks like from the picture. I bought a base punch that was flat this way I can make bullets with gas-checks on them. I shoot these in my muzzleloader with sabot. I never thought about trying them in my 44mag. My favorite 44mag load is 1000fps with a 240gr Keith style wheel-weight cast bullet. Any pointers you have will be appreciated.

Swede44mag
 
Posts: 1608 | Location: Central, Kansas | Registered: 15 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
Swede44mag
When I first got the Corbin press and dies I did the plain base bullets and knurled the bullets using Lee dip lube. They did great but were a pain in the butt to make, knurling is a real bore.
So I got the Basegard setup for my dies which is a quick change of base stem for the original die and have enjoyed the Basegard ever since. Using the plain base dies I've used annealed gas checks with Lee and Corbin dip lube to good effect. I've used the gas checks and knurled the bullets, again they worked great but were a pain in the butt to do.
I used these Basegard bullets in my two 45 acp handguns. I have another set of dies for the various 45 Colts that inhabit my gunsafe. I load those to 900 or 1,000 fps and they do fine. No leading, the accuracy improves over the factory swaged bullets and are more consistantly accurate then my home made cast bullets.
I've not played with 44 swaged bullets as I only have one 44 Special S&W mod 24. This handgun hates me and I've considered taking it to the local priest and having an exorcism done. That's another story.
I do use the Corbin for making 357 bullets. The 130 grain Basegard wadcutters are a accurate. Then I'll switch the nose punch and make SWCs.

Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Arky - I'm honestly not trying to rain on your parade, my friend, but the results you are achieving with these pistol bullets are EASILY duplicated by good cast pistol bullets. The cost to go this route would be a small fraction of the cost to do the baseguard thing.

I've shot a few 1,000 .41, 44 & .45 cast bullets in each of these calibers with superb results and accuracy.

But whatever's fun for you. Not everyone gets the casting bug.
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
Pecos
I agree. The biggest benefit that I found was the uniformity of the swaged bullets, over cast
There's plenty of people who could notice the difference between the uniformity of cast verses swaged, I happen to not be one.
I would not have come to this enlightenment with out having done the experimenting.
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia