Uh, it's not the law "now," it's been the law since 1-1-69.quote:Originally posted by NormanConquest:
I have been informed that the law is now that if you have a C+R (curio+relic)[very easy to get] license you may purchase independantly any piece over 50 years old.
quote:Originally posted by Miles Massey:Uh, it's not the law "now," it's been the law since 1-1-69.quote:Originally posted by NormanConquest:
I have been informed that the law is now that if you have a C+R (curio+relic)[very easy to get] license you may purchase independantly any piece over 50 years old.
No, when someone uses the adverb "now," they mean at present. (Look up that term as well.) Period. C&R licenses aren't a "now" or "at present" development. Savvy? (Look that up.")quote:Originally posted by Gatogordo:Perhaps in your world, "now" doesn't mean "now" but in the real world now simply means at the present time without any connotations of when it started.quote:Originally posted by Miles Massey:Uh, it's not the law "now," it's been the law since 1-1-69.quote:Originally posted by NormanConquest:
I have been informed that the law is now that if you have a C+R (curio+relic)[very easy to get] license you may purchase independantly any piece over 50 years old.
I am hardly anxious, though I'm working hard on the "asshole" part. You're somewhat ahead of me "now."quote:Originally posted by Gatogordo:
You're so anxious to prove your superior knowledge, but all you're proving is you are a complete asshole.
This is WRONG. Not surprising considering the shitty gun shops in Tulsa and Oklahoma in general. Let me guess......Sports World, right?quote:Originally posted by Kensco:
I intended to send an old Remington Model 1100 to Tulsa for repairs. I thought I could drop it off in person and they could send it back to me. They said they would have to ship it back to an FFL holder.
quote:Originally posted by Miles Massey:You moron. You keep coming up with these dickhead fantasies to explain your idiotic thought pattern and you're digging yourself into a deeper pit of stupidity with each and every post.quote:Originally posted by olcrip:
Ya know it just ain't worth all the hassle trying to get around the bullKAKA. I have sold a few fire arms on the net but won't take the chance.
Suppose a guy makes you a good offer on your firearm and you have to send it to him directly. He sends you the payment. Bingo, knows where to find you. You send the firearm directly to him. Bingo again, he sends the BATF dierectly to you with key type bracelets. Your a goner few a fist full of dollars! Just ain't worth it.![]()
There are penalties for a non-licensee who KNOWINGLY provides firearms to persons he KNOWS are prohibited from possessing them.
There are no penalties for someone who provides a firearm to someone who has represented himself to be a lawful possessor of firearms and is later revealed not to be. The same damned thing applies to an FFL holder, numbnuts.
Back before the NICS system became as "streamlined" as it is now, if a dealer didn't receive a decline or proceed notice within the allotted time, he was allowed to proceed with the sale and transfer. And there were LOTS of transactions that went through where the buyer turned out to be a prohibited person. And, no, the FFL holder didn't wind up in the dystopian fantasies that run through your empty head.
Let me know when you choose to post some "values."quote:Originally posted by olcrip:I have my values and you have your values.quote:Originally posted by Miles Massey:You moron. You keep coming up with these dickhead fantasies to explain your idiotic thought pattern and you're digging yourself into a deeper pit of stupidity with each and every post.quote:Originally posted by olcrip:
Ya know it just ain't worth all the hassle trying to get around the bullKAKA. I have sold a few fire arms on the net but won't take the chance.
Suppose a guy makes you a good offer on your firearm and you have to send it to him directly. He sends you the payment. Bingo, knows where to find you. You send the firearm directly to him. Bingo again, he sends the BATF dierectly to you with key type bracelets. Your a goner few a fist full of dollars! Just ain't worth it.![]()
There are penalties for a non-licensee who KNOWINGLY provides firearms to persons he KNOWS are prohibited from possessing them.
There are no penalties for someone who provides a firearm to someone who has represented himself to be a lawful possessor of firearms and is later revealed not to be. The same damned thing applies to an FFL holder, numbnuts.
Back before the NICS system became as "streamlined" as it is now, if a dealer didn't receive a decline or proceed notice within the allotted time, he was allowed to proceed with the sale and transfer. And there were LOTS of transactions that went through where the buyer turned out to be a prohibited person. And, no, the FFL holder didn't wind up in the dystopian fantasies that run through your empty head.