Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
At a local gun store today, saw a used Rem M700BDL LH 30-06 and new Ruger M77's LH in .270 and 30-06. Price wise, they are about the same. The 700 has a two positioin saftey. Either gun will be a project gun in the future. Re-stocked, tuned, re-barrled, etc. All I have to do is decide which one. Any suggestions? TTS | ||
|
Moderator |
This one's easy. Remington (unless it has the ISS j-lock), unless your project requires a controlled-round feed. George ------------------ | |||
|
one of us |
The Remington doesn't have a lock. I also don't really NEED a CRF. For caliber, considering a .25-06, .270, or .280. What year did Remington go to a two position safety? TTS | |||
|
<Gary Rihn> |
quote: Remington has always had a two position safety. It's the Winchester and Ruger with the three position safety. | ||
<X-Ring> |
I personaly like the M77 over the 700 as far as an off the self hunting rifle. But if my intent is to use this rifle for a platform to build a custom someday. I to would go for the Remington with out a doubt. ------------------ | ||
<500 AHR> |
M700! The Ruger is a cheap piece of SH!T and is difficult to impossible to "fix". Todd E | ||
one of us |
TTS, Do the 700. Trigger work is far easier to perform and the action is inherently more accurate than a 77. In those line of calibers, I'd suggest either a 25-06 AI or a 280 AI. I have an otherwise factory 700 BDL in 25-06 that I reamed to the Ackley Improved. I also tweaked the trigger. With no other work then that performed, the gun has shot multiple 1 hole groups @ 114 yds. ------------------ Regards, Mark | |||
|
one of us |
If this is going to be a big game hunting piece , and maybe used in rough or the back country , I'd take the Ruger hands down . I'm also willing to bet after a trigger job , or re barrelling or other work , accuracy in the field will be identical between the two , for all practical purposes . | |||
|
one of us |
A friend of mine likes Rimington actions, while I like Ruger actions. I don't know why he likes REM, but my reasons for liking Ruger actions are as follows: Accurazy is not a factor, since any rifle can be accurate enough for hunting moose, bear, caribou, and other medium to large game. Should I have the need to take this CRF bolt appart to clean it for hunting in cold weather, the only tool I need is a small nail or wire. The same can also be accomplished with bare hands. | |||
|
<Reloader66> |
The Remington action is the best action of the two to rework. I don't care for the Ruger action because it is machined to use only Ruger scope mounts. I like my actions drilled and tapped for any style scope mounts I care to use. In my view any action machined to use only the scope mounts of that rifle maker is a very poor choice for any shooter to buy. In some cases you are forced to buy a certain brand of scope to fit that action. | ||
one of us |
No doubt in my mind...the M77, hands down, but...if you a piece of wire as a bolt, no CRF, no integral mounts, no 3-pos safety, Ok your call. | |||
|
<Greg Y> |
I own both and have been able to make both shoot well. The 700 action definitely favors a project gun though. Mark,PAWildcatter: could you share with us what load your 25-06AI likes so well?? | ||
one of us |
Gentlemen, Either would be fine, but I prefer the Ruger, as I have had very good luck with mine. Joel Slate | |||
|
<BusPilot> |
I shoot Ruger. I've owned them, shot them...they're reliable and they work for me. As for the "ask any gunsmith..." and "Ruger is a piece of ....", I do not agree. My custom gunsmith could shoot whatever he wants--he shoots and likes to work on Rugers. Most people in the know would readily declare that Rugers are well-built, solid working guns. To each his own, with due respect. ------------------ | ||
<Phil R> |
My personal experience with Rugers has been excellent, in both factory and modified form. Remingtons of all kinds have given me nothing but grief. I guess it's the luck of the draw. ------------------ | ||
<500 AHR> |
Buspilot, I get the feeling you did not appreciate my post. I just tell it as I see it. Actually I think both of these actions are pieces of !@*#. The idea was a project so I suggested the easiest to modify with the most available aftermarket goodies. By the way, who is you gunsmith? None of the gunsmiths I talk to will touch a Ruger! They will work on Savages and Remingtons though. They all to a man have told me that when they were poor and starving they would work on/with Rugers but now that they are established they won't touch'em with a 10 foot pole. Everyone of these guys states the same issues with bedding system utilized. They all feel that it cannot be made to shoot reliably tight groups and resist recoil. I would just like to know as I have one Ruger (won't buy another either) and I cannot find anyone that will work on it. Todd E | ||
<BusPilot> |
Todd: Be glad to help out. I would go through Ole's for custom work (Salem, OR). Beautiful work (You may have seen my post on the Ruger RSM a few days ago). He works with a custom smith for more advanced stuff (custom brakes, etc). His son does impeccable work on recoil pads. Doing a job for me now. Don't ask Ole about his opinion on Rugers if you don't want to be set straight--you won't win! He knows his stuff and has been doing it (working on Rugers and all brands for a long time. We all want to think that our 'smiths are one of the best. All I can say is that his shop is wall-to- wall with mounts--all shot by him and his wife. They know both sides of shooting! ------------------ | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia