One of Us
| I will be watching this thread as well...I was using my junk spotting scope today and I am wanting one with more magnification then 36x, but I dont know how this will affect the heat waves that Kudu speaks of.
"Let me start off with two words: Made in America"
|
| Posts: 3326 | Location: Permian Basin | Registered: 16 December 2006 |
IP
|
|
new member
| Leica 77 with a 20-60 eye piece is my choice. For hunting I would buy the straight model with the nice but expensive travel case ($199). You can access the controls through the case. Leica also makes a 20 fixed eye piece with very good field of view. Swarovski is as good but I didn't like the cast of their lens color. I can see 5.56 mm bullets in the black at our 300 yd range. |
| |
one of us
| For me, I've only owned Swaro or Leica. Either one, I can't tell much difference b/w the 2. I currently have the 85mm Obj Swaro and have no regrets. I'd buy the Leica just as quick.
Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
|
| |
One of Us
| my leica 77 apo 20x60 has never let me down, if i ever do it again and i doubt it.... i''d change one thing ,i''d go fixed power zoom 40 -45 power. zeiss also makes fantastic spoting scopes. regards |
| Posts: 999 | Location: wisconsin | Registered: 26 April 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The Brunton and Swarovski both have the E-glass coating. From what I have read it improves clarity. I am a believer in Swarovski, my son has had one for 7 years and uses it from Sept. until Dec. He swears by them. But his were before the glass coating. I just can't believe there is that much difference between the three and also including Ziess.
I figure this spotter will last my lifetime and probably be handed down to one of my sons. |
| Posts: 10478 | Location: N.W. Wyoming | Registered: 22 February 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I also use the Leupold Gold Ring, 12-40 x 60. It is a great scope and can be found for $600-800. I have put it against a Swarovski and Zeiss. There is a slight difference, but not enough for me to pay the extra $1,200. Even the Swaro and Zeiss guys were surprised at the lack of difference. I like how it packs also. |
| Posts: 789 | Location: Utah, USA | Registered: 14 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Another vote for the golden ring leupold 12-40x60. I've used mine for about 9 or 10 years, and haven't needed anymore. Its excellent for backpacking. |
| Posts: 96 | Location: Arroyo Grande, Ca. | Registered: 09 December 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| A follow-up question, please: do any models of the ss discussed (or any others) have attachents that allow for a camera to be used with them? TIA, KG
______________________
Hunting: I'd kill to participate.
|
| Posts: 2897 | Location: Boston, MA | Registered: 04 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Kamo, the swarovski has a neat little donut looking adapter that comes with the ss that fits any digital, as a promotional gift. The others do to but I don't know anything about them. I think you can buy an adapter for any of the above mentioned, with the exception of Leupold, which I don't know.
I have owned two pair of Brunton bino's and the company has stood behind them better than any I have ever dealt with. That is why I was wondering about the spotter. I found refurbished Brunton spotters for $700, but I can't find anyone who has used one. Right now I am leaning towards the zeiss, they have a free neprene case and tripod offer if you buy it before the end of the year. But "BUT" money talks, the refurbished Brunton is half the price! |
| Posts: 10478 | Location: N.W. Wyoming | Registered: 22 February 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Thank you for the response! KG
______________________
Hunting: I'd kill to participate.
|
| Posts: 2897 | Location: Boston, MA | Registered: 04 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I also use the leupold 12-40x60. It is not as good as the Swarovski, also not as expensive.
Heck of a lot better than Nikon though. I bought a Nikon from Cabelas, set it up, took one look through it and sent it back.
Unless weight is a big issue, I would never go with a fixed power. They have their place, but I have never had the use for one. I rarely ever use mine to glass, only to confirm after spotting something interesting. Locate it, and crank it up.
While it is not the best spotting scope, $ for $ that Leupold is hard to beat. |
| |
one of us
| I have considered a pair of 20x50 bino's, wider field of view, less eye strain. But weight is an issue with that. I am headed to Sportsmans warehouse sunday, I will look through the glass on some and try and decide. I want to investgate the Brunton. Zeiss and Leica are also possibilities. |
| Posts: 10478 | Location: N.W. Wyoming | Registered: 22 February 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| |
| Posts: 283 | Location: SW Oregon | Registered: 12 June 2004 |
IP
|
|