THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Elk Cartridges
 Login/Join
 
<Ol' Sarge>
posted
Several years ago while elk hunting in Montanas Scapegoat Wilderness area I ran into an old fellow taking a load of elk out and bringing some more clients in the next day. We talked for quite a bit while he rested his horses. He told me he had been outfitting for 50 years. We got to talking about elk rifles. He asked to see mine. I handed it to him and he remarked about how he liked to see a beat up old .30-06 like mine. He thought I probably knew how to use it. He told me what really makes him cringe is when a client shows up with a brand new Weatherby magnum. When I asked him what he used he handed me an old Winchester in .25-20. When I told him that wasn't enough gun for elk, he laughed. He said when you shoot them in the ear at 25 feet it don't matter what you use. He told me that was the only gun he has ever owned and had killed over 50 elk with it.

My neighbor in Great Falls has a garage full of 6x6 or better elk racks. He is disabled and can't walk but a few yards at a time. He packs in to a pass between the Bob Marshall Wilderness and the Sun River game range and camps out by himself for as long as it takes. Sometimes a month or more. When the snow gets deep enough the elk come over that pass. He sits in a lawn chair and kills a big one every year with his .220 Swift. Every skull I looked at had a little hole just below the ear.

------------------
Ignorance is curable but stupidity is terminal.

 
Reply With Quote
<Fuzz>
posted
When I started hunting all I had was a Marlin 336 30-30. With all the brush around here ,shots were about 20-60yds. I don't use my 30-30 much anymore. I think it is wiser to use something with a little more oomph.
Fuzz
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yeah... every once in awhile you hear a story about someone who has used small calibers on large game and often that was "the only gun he had" and had to make do. Big whoop... many of these people account for much of our wounded game, and often the stories, I believe, are not true. Its part of a whole novel about people and their "hero" stories... like men fighting Big Bad Pond fish with 2lb test, and shooting deer at 812.7 yards (only on the weekends though) with our rifles that shoot 3/8" groups 440 yards.
My point is... that if any of these stories were true they would still amount to nothing in a practical sense... except of course making someone a hero, sometimes even the story teller.
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I kinda agree with smallfry but I have seen a LOT of deer shot at extreme ranges (800 yds) in my lifetime in the rimrock desert country of Mexico and the Texas Big Bend...Hard to explain that to folks from a different part of the country. I have seen some long shots in the High Veld of Africa. If you have not seen thoes long shots it's because you have not hunted in areas where thats about all your gonna get..

I shot a few elk in my early days with a 25-35, a 30-30 and a 250 Savage...but that was then and the elk came out in the open and you could get a lot closer to them on a horse...Todays elk head for the dark timber at the first shot of the season...Now I use a 338 with 250 or 300 gr. bullets as most shots are going away..I have to walk and only use a horse to get to the area..I liked the old days, ride up on them, jump off and shoot at 50 to a 100 yds.

I did see a cowboy one time bounce a 25-20 off a Elks head, saw the same thing happen with a Charlais bull and a 30 carbine, they don't always work.

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42225 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
<1GEEJAY>
posted
Hey,
I sometimes wonder about some of the scenarios about wounding animals,and missing game,or I made a good shot,but the game ran off.My question to these posts,is,how much preparation did the hunter do before he went on his hunt.What is typical around this country,if you hang at gunsmiths or gun shops,someone will come in and ask to have his rifle bore sighted.He is accomodated.Those people will hunt with that gun,and never have they gone to a range.Then theres the hunter who buys a box of ammo,put up a paper pie plate,and ig he hits it on the first shot,he is good to go.10 years later he still has ten rounds left in his box of ammo.Last but not least,is the hunter who sighted in his rifle many years ago,and assumes hes good to go for life.My point being,if I am going to lay out the big bucks for a hunt,there will be many hours at the range,preparing for the type hunt I am going on.There is a lot of good info on these forums,and most are based on experience,and long hours spent at the range.Heed the advice and put the time in.You will be greatful,when you fullfil your dream hunt.
1geejay
www.shooting-hunting.com
 
Reply With Quote
<Adirondack Joe>
posted
Sometimes things are not as they seem. Seeing as hunters take elk every year with bows, it is reasonable to assume that a skilled hunter who can effectively stalk within 30 yds of an elk could take them cleanly with guns such as a 25-35 or 35 Rem. I have met guys that have done that. The problem was that they started losing their hearing and decided to give up guns. Now they shoot recurves, and still collect elk. Time and time again, hunters prove that one who can get close and pick his shots can do wonders.
 
Reply With Quote
<Slamfire>
posted
I'll have to agree with Ray on the long shots. Where I hunted Couse whitetail the little slicksters had a comfort zone of 400 yards, you could not get closer than that. I'll also admit none of my elk was more than 75 yards from the muzzle when I pressed the trigger. I'll bet a .30-30 would have done as good a job as my 6.5x57.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The best elk gun is the one you have in your hand when you have toi shoot a elk.
 
Posts: 19733 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
<X-Ring>
posted
While I in no way advocate going out to hunt Elk with a 25-20. I will note that I know a man that would do it and I 'm telling you he would come home with an elk. There are men of the old school that know how to shoot & do it well. As the old saying goes" Fear the man that has but one gun, He likly knows how to use it"
I know a guy here in MT. that claims to have killed all his elk with a 22-250rem. I dion't know if he has or not. I have never hunted elk with him, but I know he is a hell of a shoot.
For my money I will continue to us my 338 winnie on elk. A chest is a much better target in my book. I'v hunted elk long enough to know you won't always get a head shoot.
X-Ring
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dutch
posted Hide Post
One of the guys that works on the farm used his 22-250 with 55 grainers on cow elk for years. Never did lose one. Doesn't mean it was smart, or anything else. It was his only gun, and he shoots it year round at coyotes and such. He bought a 25-06 last year, didn't like the way the last cow went 100 yards before she dropped. Again, he hunts from his house after work, and just waits for the animals to get to "the spot" where he has a clean shot. Would I use a 22-250? Not unless it was the only rifle I had! It would definitely change the way I hunt. JMO, Dutch.
 
Posts: 4564 | Location: Idaho Falls, ID, USA | Registered: 21 September 2000Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Paul H
posted Hide Post
I've posted this before, and as I recall, I put it like this.

To be an effective hunter, one needs to know the limitations of his bullet, arrow, etc., and make his shot accordingly. I have no doubt one could keep themselves in game with a 22 mag, 22 hornet, 223, 25-20 etc. I would also try not to be a smart aleck and tell someone that has taken more game then I likely ever will that he isn't using enough gun.

I know the type of performance I prefer, and pick my rounds accordingly, I don't begrudge those that value different aspects of a cartridges performance, and hence choose something different.

 
Posts: 7213 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Canuck
posted Hide Post
Right on, Paul.

Canuck

 
Posts: 7123 | Location: The Rock (southern V.I.) | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
<Ol' Sarge>
posted
Paul H and Canuck,
My point exactly.
I got started on my little rant because I'd seen too many criticisms of both small calibers and long range shooting.
IF you know what you are doing either is effective.

------------------
Ignorance is curable, but stupidity is terminal.

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ol' Sarge... are you posting these messages to get me all riled up?
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
<Ol' Sarge>
posted
smallfry, Yes.

------------------
Ignorance is curable, but stupidity is terminal.

 
Reply With Quote
<Ol' Sarge>
posted
smallfry, Nah, not really. However you were the first to jump on my first post about small calibers.

True story.
About 15 years ago my Dad sold his farm and moved to 25 acres on the lake. He mentioned to me that he would like to have a smaller cartridge than his 7mm Rem. I picked up a used Marlin 340 in .222 for him thinking it would be a great groundhog gun. He has made a one-shot kill on deer with it every year since. Factory Win 50 grainers. Lung and shoulder shots every one. None have run more than 60 yards. He swears it's a better deer rifle than his big 7.

------------------
Ignorance is curable, but stupidity is terminal.

 
Reply With Quote
<robbnsc>
posted
My vote is with Ray Atkinson. Anything under a 30'06, 180 grain in todays elk hunting environment is too light. If you have to shoot at a poor angle or at long range, you want to deliver high momentum and deep penetration. I have used a 7mm Rem Mag, 160 grain for elk and I feel that caliber is too light for timber elk hunting. I much prefer a .300, 200 grain or a .338, 225 grain.
 
Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ol' Sarge:
IF you know what you are doing either is effective.

A favorite saying of mine comes from the Dirty Harry series of movies:

"A man's gotta know his limitations."

So true.

It is human nature to minimize limitations, but, something seldom discussed in hunting circles is the fact that for many hunters, placing limitations on themeselves (or increasing the degree of difficulty) enhances the satisfaction of a successful hunt.

Canuck

 
Posts: 7123 | Location: The Rock (southern V.I.) | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
<Reloader66>
posted
From the farmer who uses his 22 rim fire single shot 22 on the 960 lb beef to the big game hunter harvesting Elephant in Africa with his 460 Weatherby. Vast amounts of room between those two mentioned above for all the remaining cartridges now in use to harvest game. Lets keep it that way for a good long time. If we all thought exactly alike when it comes to game we all would be shooting game with one cartridge. Better to have ones personal choice than none at all. I would not choose the 460 or the 22 rimfire but one of the many in between cartridges.
 
Reply With Quote
<10point>
posted
When I hear these Long Range story's I just chuckle, cut the range in half, and congratulate the guy for making such a long shot, while keeping my finger's crossed behind my back.

Maybe its just me but it seem's that the lousier the shot a guy is the more he makes up stories about "shooting long", thank Lord I have some humility about my shooting it keep's my mouth glued when this subject comes up and I want to join in. 400 yrds is plenty long and thats only on a hit animal on the way out.

Dollars to doughnuts there are 10 times more animals crippled by 600 yrd hero's then there are guy's who show up with "shiney new magnum's" and still keep their shot's reasonable.

But boy just let some guy's go to a 600 yrd flat, wind protected, stepped off range, with flags, and hit a target while shooting off the bench.

I dont think most guy's realize just how far 400 yrds is. I only know because its longer then I can shoot and hit an animal 100% of the time.

I can kill 100% of the time from 300 yrds tho, maybe 350. That I know, ive shot 100 times in a day ,from all fixed position's, from those yardages. I guess I can only hunt the Cous deer that are stupid enough to be 300 yrds away, is there such a place with Cous deer that stupid ?

But 600 yrds ? hahahahahah....sure baby, lay dem stories on me.........:-).....10

 
Reply With Quote
<Ol' Sarge>
posted
Man, I thought this thread had died!

I use an -06 with 165gr Speer Grand Slams at 2850 for elk. None went more than 50yds or so. One dropped in it's tracks. All were shot at less than 100yds through the heart or lungs. I know the limitations of my gun and myself.

I have shot several deer at over 450yds though. I knew the exact distance and the trajectory of my rifle, there was no wind and I had a rock steady rest, and I practice a LOT out to 500yds. I never pull the trigger unless I KNOW I can make the shot.
However, I much prefer to get close. As close as I can. That's 10x more fun than making a long shot. I have killed way more deer at less than 20yds than I have at over 200.
I've done a lot of bowhunting since I was about 15, but have gotten real serious about it in the last 5 years. It has taught me a lot about deer and elk.

As far as real long range goes, I have shot at paper and varmints enough to know that it's pretty iffy when the range gets real long. Now, I just got a new Sendero in .300 RUM and when I get a scope for it I'm going to start practicing way out there.

------------------
To be old and wise.....first you have to be young and stupid!

 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia