THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Another Sad Wolf Story
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
A friend in Montana just sent this to me. A prime example of how the anti-hunters are beating us.

Elk exodus: Big game animals scarce in once-popular hunting district along Gallatin River


By BRETT FRENCH Billings Gazette | Posted: Sunday, December 6, 2009 1:15 am |

B OZEMAN – Elk numbers have fallen so low in the upper Gallatin River drainage that the state is proposing a permit-only season next year for at most 50 hunters.

Two wolf packs and grizzly bears are responsible for the decline, according to Julie Cunningham, a wildlife biologist in the Bozeman office of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

A meeting was held last week in Bozeman to outline the problem and permit changes, as well as to hear the public’s suggestions.

“We need to discuss the nature of hunting in a resource that’s dwindling,” Cunningham said.

Hunting District 310 is about 219 square miles of rugged mountains and drainages southwest of Bozeman and northwest of Yellowstone National Park. The district is bordered by the Madison Range to the west and the Gallatin Range to the east. Its northern boundary extends to the east of the resort community of Big Sky.

Two packs hunt in the area. The Hayden pack had six wolves and the Cougar Two had 10 at the end of 2008. Grizzly bears, which were returned to the endangered species list in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem this year, also inhabit the territory, as do black bears and mountain lions.

Elk are the main food source for wolves in the region, and grizzly bears are the primary predators of elk calves. But it wasn’t until wolves arrived in the region in significant numbers that FWP saw the dramatic decline in elk numbers.

As recently as 2005, 1,500 elk were counted in the hunting district. This year, only 200 were found.

“Our population objective is to manage within 20 percent of 1,500 wintering elk,” Cunningham said. “In recent years, we’re as far as 85 percent below that objective.”

In hopes of counteracting the elk population’s downturn, FWP eliminated late hunts in the district in 2004 and in 2007 went to a permit-only system for bulls, although the number of permits was not capped. Still, the elk population has declined by about 30 percent annually.

Hunters aren’t killing many elk – only about 60 in 2008. Instead, Cunningham said it is the area’s four-legged hunters that have taken a toll on the elk herd.

According to her research, in 2006 there were 23 wolves to every 1,000 elk in Hunting District 310. That compares to nine wolves to every 1,000 elk on the Northern Yellowstone Range in nearby Yellowstone Park. Grizzly bears numbered 57 to every 1,000 elk in HD 310, compared to nine per 1,000 on the Northern Range.

“Those ratios are really key when we expect to see wolf influence on elk distribution,” Cunningham said. “We expect to see it at 10 per 1,000.”

She added that there are no habitat factors that would explain the decline in elk. Recreational use of the drainage by snowmobilers has been blamed by some for fewer wintering elk, but Cunningham said she’s not pointing any fingers.

Some elk, feeling too crowded by predators and people, simply relocated to a less-stressful environment in the Madison Valley, where large swaths of private land provide a safe haven but also keep hunters at bay. Without public hunting, wildlife managers can’t control population densities.

The fact that HD 310 contains good winter elk habitat on public land accessible to hunters yet isn’t being used to its fullest bothers Kurt Alt, Region 3 wildlife manager for FWP.

“Why would we not put an effort into restoring elk on public land?” Alt said.

Cunningham said FWP is seeing similar declines in elk caused by predators in portions of the Bitterroot and Clark Fork valleys. Any formula that could revive elk in HD 310 might be duplicated in other hunting districts, she added.

One obvious way to revive the elk herd would be to thin the number of predators. Although Montana held its first wolf hunting season this fall, only two of the 72 killed were taken in the area of HD 310. Montana does not have a season for grizzly bears, although hunters pursuing other game account for the majority of grizzly deaths in the Greater Yellowstone Area.

But whether Montana will have a wolf hunting season next year is in doubt. U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy is considering if the animals should be relisted as an endangered species. He will make a ruling on the lawsuit next year.

Mike Leahy, Rocky Mountain region director of Defenders of Wildlife, said targeting wolves to boost the elk population would not be good conservation and should not be the role of government. He also noted that statewide, elk are doing well. In 2007, the state estimated the elk population at more than 123,500. The state’s wolf population is estimated at 500.

“You have some isolated situations like this one, but if you look at elk as a whole, they’re doing great,” Leahy said.

Defenders is one of several environmental groups challenging the delisting of gray wolves in the Northern Rockies. Leahy said the group believes this fall’s wolf hunts in Montana and Idaho were premature and not designed to sustain the survival of wolves.

Contact Brett French at french@billingsgazette.com or at (406) 657-1387.


Pancho
LTC, USA, RET

"Participating in a gun buy-back program because you think that criminals have too many guns is like having yourself castrated because you think your neighbors have too many kids." Clint Eastwood

Give me Liberty or give me Corona.
 
Posts: 937 | Location: Roswell, NM | Registered: 02 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have known for a long time anti's would much rather have wolves and bears kill big game then hunters any day of the week.

Wolves and bears tearing and eating a elk or deer alive is much better then one being killed in seconds from a well placed shot.

Anti's would much rather have less game and no hunters then lots of game and hunters around.
 
Posts: 19601 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Troy Hibbitts
posted Hide Post
hell, I'd like to be able to hunt BOTH elk and wolves (along with bear, etc).

My opinion only - where USF&W screwed up on the wolf reintroductions in the first place was doing so under the ESA - wolves should have been reintroduced as GAME ANIMALS from the start.

Of course, I live way down here in TX and unless the Mexican wolf pops in AZ and NM go way up, I doubt I'll get the opportunity to actually hunt any wolves (my job makes getting away out of state difficult in the fall for more than five days at a time). . . but the thought of a nice wolf trophy does tickle my fancy, that's for sure!

Troy


http://thehibbitts.net/
Brackettville, TX
 
Posts: 282 | Location: Brackettville, TX | Registered: 13 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Big Bore Boar Hunter
posted Hide Post
Yup, Thats government for you. Introduce a pest species and kill off the game species. I can't wait until they list polio as an endagered species.

John
 
Posts: 1343 | Location: Northern California | Registered: 15 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Get used to it. That area isn't the only one impacted by run away wolf populations. Mad
 
Posts: 10478 | Location: N.W. Wyoming | Registered: 22 February 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia