06 November 2006, 05:04
jbanother bang flop for the .270
chalk up another one for ol'blue.tipped over on spot.150 yds.
06 November 2006, 07:23
taylorce1It is just plain hard to beat a good .270 any way you put it.
08 November 2006, 08:07
Bobby TomekCongrats on filling the tag. But the performance of the .270 WCF??? That's no real surprise. It's been doing just that for a year or two now...

09 November 2006, 08:30
jbsure likes 130 gr core locks.

09 November 2006, 10:30
AI22-250Thirty plus years of handloads using 58gr or so of 4831 and 130gr Sierra BTS have taken 30 plus good sized Mule deer out west. Most shots are between 2-300yrds. Flat shooting and little recoil can't be beat.....
09 November 2006, 17:38
mt AlAmen to all of the above. I used 130 grain Corelocks exclusively for about 20 years with no problems that I can remember. Now I'm worried: last year my scope fogged (steel tube Weaver K4) and I went all out and got a new .300 WM and new Weaver 4.75 GS scope. Makes me wonder if I should have stuck with the .270...low recoil, very accurate, flat shooting = devistating