Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Hey Pal, I did not say that the law was written to line the guids pockets, I just asked the question. The problem I have is: I know several men who moved to Alaska and became guides with minnimal experience in the woods. They went to work for who I consider to be a real scalywaag. Those same guides laugh at me when I come to visit because I have to pay them many thousands of dollars for what I used to do for the cost of a tag and they know I can do it better than them. If the law was written to protect green horn flatlanders, let it protect them. I just think there should be a provision for those who have lived in the state in the past and have proven themselves competent. I don't mind paying out of state fees but I don't want to pay a guide for a job that I have proven myself to be competent in doing myself. | ||
|
one of us |
Alex, no one is even arguing about having to pay out-of-state fees. Requiring a guide to hunt makes as much sense as requiring visitors to New York to hire a guide before they can go see a broadway show. JMO, Dutch. | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: Why shouldn't they have the same access? Illinois also "protects" the resident hunters, but I can't see why this is so. Very, very little of the taxes I pay in Illinois goes to support hunting, so I can't see why my paying taxes here should get me any bonus. They only people I can see who should get any advantage are the landowners on which the game forage. If my state screws your state's residents, your state will screw me. Frankly, my butt already hurts enough from all the screwing various levels of government give me. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia