THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Gun Platforms of the Two Parties
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted
Below are the OFFICIAL platforms of both political parties in regards to firearms. Pick your poison carfeully. -TONY

DNC

Firearms

We recognize that the right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans’ Second Amendment right to own and use firearms. We believe that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation, but we know that what works in Chicago may not work in Cheyenne. We can work together to enact and enforce commonsense laws and improvements – like closing the gun show loophole, improving our background check system, and reinstating the assault weapons ban, so that guns do not fall into the hands of terrorists or criminals. Acting responsibly and with respect for differing views on this issue, we can both protect the constitutional right to bear arms and keep our communities and our children safe.

RNC

Upholding the Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms

We uphold the right of individual Americans to own firearms, a right which antedated the Constitution and was solemnly confirmed by the Second Amendment. We applaud the Supreme Court’s decision in Heller affirming that right, and we assert the individual responsibility to safely use and store firearms. We call on the next president to appoint judges who will similarly respect the Constitution. Gun ownership is responsible citizenship, enabling Americans to defend themselves, their property, and communities.

We call for education in constitutional rights in schools, and we support the option of firearms training in federal programs serving senior citizens and women. We urge immediate action to review the automatic denial of gun ownership to returning members of the Armed Forces who have suffered trauma during service to their country. We condemn frivolous lawsuits against firearms manufacturers, which are transparent attempts to deprive citizens of their rights. We oppose federal licensing of law-abiding gun owners and national gun registration as violations of the Second Amendment. We recognize that gun control only affects and penalizes law-abiding citizens, and that such proposals are ineffective at reducing violent crime.


Tony Mandile - Author "How To Hunt Coues Deer"
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Snellstrom
posted Hide Post
Thanks Tony,
I for one appreciate you posting that.
 
Posts: 5604 | Location: Eastern plains of Colorado | Registered: 31 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Charles_Helm
posted Hide Post
quote:
We recognize that gun control only affects and penalizes law-abiding citizens, and that such proposals are ineffective at reducing violent crime.


clap
 
Posts: 8773 | Location: Republic of Texas | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of D99
posted Hide Post
I sent $200 to the Republican party, I am going to try and send some more money, but I don't know what the cap is.

Any ideas?
 
Posts: 4729 | Location: Australia | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You CAN'T contribute DIRECTLY to McCain now (after 8/31), as he is taking public funds (84 million I believe), but the RNC and a bunch of other groups can recieve donations and work to elect him. Cap for McCain directly was $2300 per individual.

Most Dems in general, and Obama in particular, have spoken VOLUMES thru their words and actions. They can't erase that with an "official" party platform or statement that directly contradicts these own actions.

What's sad is the number of gun owners and sportsmen who will FALL for it.
 
Posts: 156 | Location: Southern MD | Registered: 29 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Red C.
posted Hide Post
Thanks, Tony, for the post.


Red C.
Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.
 
Posts: 909 | Location: SE Oklahoma | Registered: 18 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
When the Democrats refer to the "gun show loophole" ... can anyone explain to me what they are referring to?
 
Posts: 143 | Location: SE Wyoming | Registered: 28 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of DesertRam
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Deertick:
When the Democrats refer to the "gun show loophole" ... can anyone explain to me what they are referring to?


The ability (aka right) in many states to buy guns from private sellers without undergoing a background check like you do when you buy from a licensed dealer.


_____________________
A successful man is one who earns more money than his wife can spend.
 
Posts: 3301 | Location: Southern NM USA | Registered: 01 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Gun show loophole is a made up hysteria. Anyone who has ever held an FFL knows that the same laws apply to gun shows as in every gun shop in the USA. Sales between individuals are not regulated in your backroom or at a gun show. I'd also like for someone from the DNC to tell me about the laws that work in Chicago. They lost more Americans in Chicago than in Iraq this summer. Obviously banning handguns and not allowing law-abiding citizens to carry concealed works wonders! Someone please explain about what works in Chicago.


A shot not taken is always a miss
 
Posts: 2788 | Location: gallatin, mo usa | Registered: 10 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm just looking to understand this "loophole" business more -- people do ask about it. It is a major part of the democrats' "common sense" proposals.

So ... an FFL holder with a shop can sell guns, without a backgroud check, as a person-to-person transfer? That is, the background check is for the customers, but the process can be bypassed for the FFL holder's buddies (or criminals) by moving the sale to the back room?

Also ... can anyone tell me the law regarding a private sale between non-FFL holders? For instance, if I sold a rifle to a friend, do you think I have any legal exposure?
 
Posts: 143 | Location: SE Wyoming | Registered: 28 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Deertick:
I'm just looking to understand this "loophole" business more -- people do ask about it. It is a major part of the democrats' "common sense" proposals.
The "gun show loophole" is actually the lack of federal restriction on sales between unlicensed individuals. Federal law does prohibit acting as a gun dealer without a license, ie. buying and selling with the primary intent to engage in commerce. The "gun show loophole" has some resonance with the public because large numbers of otherwise anonymous transactions can take place at gun shows, which potentially creates a ready avenue for guns to be transferred to unqualified individuals. In some cities, the crews of "Gangbangers" cruising the aisles are obviously not looking for a Winchester Model 21 or an 1893 Marlin. Some gun shows are poorly policed by the promoters and have become notorious as "swap shops" for illegitimate buyers and sellers. Although I love guns and trading and swapping, I've quit going to a number of these gun shows because of the types of people who roam them and the obviuos low quality of the firearms offered by the typical seller. I don't have an immediate solution for the problem, but we are all better served if we acknowledge that it exists and look for a way to curb the abuses while maintaining the ability of legitimate commerce between individuals.

So ... an FFL holder with a shop can sell guns, without a backgroud check, as a person-to-person transfer? That is, the background check is for the customers, but the process can be bypassed for the FFL holder's buddies (or criminals) by moving the sale to the back room?

No. A holder of an FFL may not transfer a gun to anyone without the full paperwork and background check. Formerly, a holder of an FFL could only transfer a gun at his recorded place of business, but several years ago the DEMOCRATIC Congress amended the law to allow holders of FFLs to sell at any location within their state of residence. We should give credit where credit is due.

Also ... can anyone tell me the law regarding a private sale between non-FFL holders? For instance, if I sold a rifle to a friend, do you think I have any legal exposure?

Private sales between non-FFL holders are not regulated by the GCA of 1968. Some states do regulate or restrict sales between individuals. As to liability, if you act as the "straw" purchaser for an individual who is otherwise not qualified to purchase a gun, then you have broken the law. If you transfer a gun to a person whom you know or should have known is unqualified to purchase it or intends to use the gun illegally, then you have broken the law. In terms of civil liability, you could have a successful civil case pressed against you if you acted negligently in transfering a gun to someone whom you might reasonably have known would use the gun to cause harm.
 
Posts: 13245 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DesertRam:
quote:
Originally posted by Deertick:
When the Democrats refer to the "gun show loophole" ... can anyone explain to me what they are referring to?


The ability (aka right) in many states to buy guns from private sellers without undergoing a background check like you do when you buy from a licensed dealer.

This and the post by stonecreek are accurate.....

However IMO the real reason that gun show sales are being discouraged is the face to face non FFL sales that do not include sales taxes.....

Background checks have done nothing to reduce crime.....conceal to carry has!!!

A private citizen can sell to another private citizen legally without a background check anytime.....and is not required to collect sales tax!

The BATF is far more about taxes than any sort of crime control!


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Sierra_Dave
posted Hide Post
Politics has become so expensive that it takes a lot of money even to be defeated.

The more you observe politics, the more you've got to admit that each party is worse than the other.

There is no more independence in politics than there is in jail.

If you ever injected truth into politics you have no politics.
Will Rogers


"We are all here for a short spell; so get all the good laughs you can.
Everything is funny as long as it is happening to Somebody Else."
Will Rogers
 
Posts: 82 | Location: Sierra Nevada Mountains | Registered: 10 July 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia