THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  American Big Game Hunting    Re: Hunting bullet failures on whitetails????

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: Hunting bullet failures on whitetails????
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Quote:

Just a different viewpoint: Is it really possible to validate bullet 'failure' if the bullet was indeed recovered? Might it be more appropriate to say that the bullet did not perform as expected or as designed? I don't mean to split hairs but to me bullet failure is a nonrecovered animal, and even then, it is just a guess whether it is my error or the bullet. Maybe an exception is if more than one shot was required.








Certainly you can validly claim bullet failure if the animal is recovered. Two examples are if a bullet designed to expand simply does not, and if one that is designed not to expand does. The results of either scenario may the outfitter visiting you in the hospital telling you "Good news! You made a beautiful shot and right after that buff gored and stomped you the bullet didn't fail caused he died and we recovered him."



The old saw "at what point in the animals death did the bullet fail" can be likened to "at what point in stopping the vehicle did your brakes fail?"



Well, if your brakes should stop you in 200 feet and they took you 300 into an intersection where you were T-boned they failed even though they stopped the vehicle.



IMO any product that doesn't perform as designed has failed.



As to the original post only two:



130gr W-W Hollowpoint .270 Win approx 3000fps mfg circa 1960; whitetail buck; about 65yds no apparent expansion, three shots in three inches broadside through shoulders; animal recovered.



165gr Nosler BT first year on market. .30/06 near book max velocity. Whitetail doe directly facing about 30 feet; no obstructions; shooting braced sitting position at ground level for center of chest. Shot called good; Light blood trail increased rapidly. Jumped her standing at shot+15 min about 75yds from POI. At this location much blood on ground but no apparent organ blood. Jumped her again 150 yds. furthur at about shot+35min. By this time blood was coagulated and very little where she lay. She crossed creek and I could find no blood on other side nor did area search recover the animal.



I had an interesting 15yd downward-angle shot on a whitetail doe last year with a 165gr Partition from a .308 Win. :



A very sharp angle away presentation- I put the bullet on perhaps the last true rib (right-hand side). A sheet of skin about the size and shape of my forearm was peeled off neatly exposing three or four ribs and the upper right foreleg was nearly severed. Apparently the nose section had simply glanced up the outside of the ribcage and hit the foreleg.



Just in front of the left foreleg was a dime sized hole where I presume the base exited after passing through vitals. Recovered the doe about 60 yds away. I can only wonder if an unbonded cup/core bullet would have entirely skipped off her ribcage or would have penetrated.



Of course I don't consider this as a failure (as the NP nose jacket is drawn very thin and designed to be fragile.
 
Posts: 612 | Location: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of eskimo36
posted Hide Post
Be very specific if you have an incident where your bullet failed to perform...caliber, velocity, bullet, hit location, angle of shot, size of deer....
 
Posts: 487 | Location: OK | Registered: 02 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
ALL I can post on is how NOT to have bullet failures on deer. I have always shot heavy for caliber bullets.
150gr for .270
200+ gr for .30 cal anything
250gr for .35 cal
actually anything bigger then .35 is pretty much a moot point on deer

I have taken better then 200 of the little furry critters, includig a pretty good size buck that dressed out tipped teh scales better then 200#(.358win, 250gr Speer, complete penetration) and have never had bullet failures with the heavy bullets.
 
Posts: 624 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 07 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Same here as Lawcop. On an animal the size of a white tail, if you have a "bullet failure", it is more than likely a "hunter failure": Exceedingly poor bullet selection and/or poor shot placement.
 
Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I agree usually bullet failure equates into shot placement failure.
 
Posts: 725 | Location: Upstate Rural NY | Registered: 16 July 2004Reply With Quote
One Of Us
posted Hide Post
Check out my post on Accubonds here: Accubonds fail on deer

Photo below and additional photos and explanation are on page 8 of the above thread.
 
Posts: 979 | Registered: 04 June 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Reloader
posted Hide Post
CL,

How did you get those deer to be still long enough for you to remove those nice mushroomed bullets?

If there in the freezer, it didn't fail.

Reloader
 
Posts: 4146 | Location: North Louisiana | Registered: 18 February 2004Reply With Quote
One Of Us
posted Hide Post
Unfortunately, one deer didn't keep still so I had to use a knife to kill the buck that my friend shot in the butt (left bullet in photo). The rest did die shortly after impact.

The concern was if the bullets were to be used for larger game or angling shots at larger game, then there might not be enough penetration.
 
Posts: 979 | Registered: 04 June 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Unfortunately, one deer didn't keep still so I had to use a knife to kill the buck that my friend shot in the butt (left bullet in photo). The rest did die shortly after impact.

The concern was if the bullets were to be used for larger game or angling shots at larger game, then there might not be enough penetration.




Your concern is genuine. When in doubt, use triple shocks. < !--color-->
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Be very specific if you have an incident where your bullet failed to perform...caliber, velocity, bullet, hit location, angle of shot, size of deer....






Just a different viewpoint: Is it really possible to validate bullet 'failure' if the bullet was indeed recovered? Might it be more appropriate to say that the bullet did not perform as expected or as designed? I don't mean to split hairs but to me bullet failure is a nonrecovered animal, and even then, it is just a guess whether it is my error or the bullet. Maybe an exception is if more than one shot was required.



The only example I have that may be considered a 'failure' is when I shot a whitetail buck/218lb dressed. 130 yards broadside. Load/Equip.: Ruger factory 270 MKII, 150 Speer Spitzer over max load of IMR4831, WWbrass, FED210M primer, velocity-2720. Bullet hit perfect behind shoulder, deer dropped and didn't move. Bullet was recovered on offside skin right behind shoulder. Lead and jacket were separated but when put back together, perfect mushroom.



BUT HEY, I GOT THE DEER!! My expectations of the load were not met. I expected a passthrough at that range with that bullet wt and a max charge. However, there are those that would state "your bullet failed."



Quite frankly, I don't give a crap if the bullet shatters into 500 pieces as long as the animal is dead and dead quick.



I have a report from a hunting buddy from South Dakota. He killed a 300+lb sow blackbear with a 7STW using 140 Ballistic Tips over near max IMR7828 at 30 yards. Bullet fragmented all over the kill zone. BUT HEY, SHE DIED RIGHT THERE!! No exit hole (obviously).



I guess you could say that this bullet really failed. OR DID IT?
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Reloader
posted Hide Post
CL,

I just couldn't resist.

I do like the Accubond though, they are not near is tough as I would have figured. I had originally thought they would be alittle too tough but, now, I do intend on using them in the future.

Good Luck!

Reloader
 
Posts: 4146 | Location: North Louisiana | Registered: 18 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
As Beeman and Doc said. You want to see the busiest night at the gun range, it is not the evening before season opener,

It is the Sunday afternoon of opening weekend.

Every Banana that shot at a deer and missed it, is blaming it on his scope and rifle and the range is lined up with tons of guys out shooting up boxes of ammo to check the zero on their scopes.

Hunters seem to blame themselves lastly for any failure if they blame themselves at all. Sort of reflective on our society in general on any subject nowadays.

seafire
 
Posts: 2889 | Location: Southern OREGON | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Again, not realy a failure because the deer dropped in its tracks.

Hornady 150 gr. interlock from 30/06 at about 2850 m.v.
First shot, 25 yards, lung shot, would not have gone far.
Second shot, 12 feet, down into the base of his neck, hit spine. One hole going in, thirteen holes coming out. Some exit holes on top, sides and bottom of neck. Could not tell which holes were made from bullet and which from bone. I realy can't blame the bullet for flying apart at that shot.
 
Posts: 118 | Location: Wisconsin , USA | Registered: 07 August 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Why are we shooting a deer in the ass? errr, excuse me, butt? Was it the trophy of a lifetime? A wounded animal that might have gotten away? Were we just arkansawing the poor bastard hoping to connect? I stand by my statement: hunter failure: exceedingly poor shot placement. A shot to the little brown spot is usually, quickly letal. However your margin of error is small. An inch or two in either direction is a shot to the ham/leg bone/pelvis which can mean a lost animal and a lingering death to a fine quarry.
 
Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Were we just arkansawing the poor bastard hoping to connect?






Hey, I thought it was Texas?? (Texas heart shot?)
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
One Of Us
posted Hide Post
Whoa Beemanbeme! Hope my bud doesn't see your post



The THS is a very effective shot. FYI, he placed the bullet right through the AA-hole (Alberta A-hole) and it proceeded to blow-up the pelvis and surrounding tissue. This is a great shot, 150 yards or so and slowly walking away...



Hope Ray Atkinson doesn't mind me quoting him here but he even said
Quote:

The Texas heart shots not a high percentage shot? Now what the hell does that mean? It is probably the quickest killing shot that I know of, other than brain or spine... It tears up the heart lung area, along with whatever else that gets in its way like liver, stomach, spine or whatever..








The only fault was overestimating the penetrating power of the 180gr. Accubond, which even Nosler will retest after seeing our results on deer. Maybe next year we'll try the TSX or Partition etc...



So there! hahahah
 
Posts: 979 | Registered: 04 June 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Whoa Beemanbeme! Hope my bud doesn't see your post

The THS is a very effective shot. FYI, he placed the bullet right through the AA-hole (Alberta A-hole) and it proceeded to blow-up the pelvis and surrounding tissue. This is a great shot, 150 yards or so and slowly walking away...

Hope Ray Atkinson doesn't mind me quoting him here but he even said
Quote:

The Texas heart shots not a high percentage shot? Now what the hell does that mean? It is probably the quickest killing shot that I know of, other than brain or spine... It tears up the heart lung area, along with whatever else that gets in its way like liver, stomach, spine or whatever..





The only fault was overestimating the penetrating power of the 180gr. Accubond, which even Nosler will retest after seeing our results on deer. Maybe next year we'll try the TSX or Partition etc...

So there! hahahah




Uhhh, you just said the only fault was overestimating the penetrating power of the 180gr. Accubond. < !--color--> Wouldn't that be "human error?"...which is part of Beeman's arguement.

With all due respect to Ray and you and your hunting companions, isn't it a bit messy gutting a booty hole shot deer? Don't get me wrong...I'd take that shot if it was THE ONLY one I had and it was a magnificent trophy, but, I'm not real certain (having witnessed a few myself) that the anal probe shot penetrates all the way to the heart/lung area consistantly, and if it did, the anatomy itself wouldn't allow all 3 (heart and both lungs) to be torn up consistantly. I'm not doubting that there have been deer taken quickly this way at all, but you'd really need a premium penetrator...Swift A Frame, partition, TRIPLE SHOCK.

Keep this in mind...I believe the Accubond is nothing more than a glorified Ballistic Tip with a thicker jacket. Not a bullet I would choose on a booty hole.

I certainly believe Ray when he says it's a quick kill shot but I would argue that what occurs with that shot is the destruction of the descending arteries that traverse the spine and pelvic girdle...the deer simply bleeds out from all the ruptured vessels...let alone the pain it must feel from having a frickin bullet UP ITS ASS AT GOD KNOWS HOW MANY FPS!!

Animals can die from shock/pain...they simply pass out...same as a human with trauma...which is what actually kills them off after they pass out.

Next time I archery hunt...which is tomorrow, the next day, and the day after that , if I am presented with a booty hole shot from a doe, I'll launch an arrow up her keester and see how fast she dies. I'll post the results if I am successful...we'll see if the THS is all it's cut out to be...or does a THS only work with bullets? Hmmm, the anatomy is the same, so according to the previous arguements, an arrow should do the same...stay tuned...
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
[ When in doubt, use Triple Shocks]
 
Posts: 3998 | Location: Hudsonville MI USA | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
Oh, this was with archery equipment. Sorry.
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I agree that time on the ground is not the villain many believe. A poor field dressing job will do more damage than a few hours.

I believe I've noticed taste differences in does killed on the same day off the same piece of property and with both having prompt and clean care.
 
Posts: 612 | Location: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of CDH
posted Hide Post
Quote:

on very hot days (like Africa) and waited some time to gut a couple




'Funny taste', based on lots of unintentional experiments gaffing large fish in the Gulf of Mexico (and a few less than optimum bullet hits on deer ), comes from stomach fluids seeping into meat. I lost several blackfin tuna one time, when I was too tired to clean them that night, and I discovered a punctured gut is NOT necessary for this to happen, but it speeds it up a lot.

Cool the carcass, and it slows down a lot...my somewhat educated opinion is that it slows down the enzyme action of the gut fluids...anyone with a biology background will know how highly temperature dependant body chemistry is.

True rot/decomposition takes much longer to penetrate undisturbed tissue.

Get 'em while they're hot!!!
 
Posts: 1780 | Location: South Texas, U. S. A. | Registered: 22 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill Soverns
posted Hide Post
Not a bullet failure but we did have one come apart this year. Story below.

My son shot a doe opening morning here at about 50 yards. The shot spun this animal 360 degrees and knocked her flat. She then got up and ran about 40 yards and piled up. I didnt think anything was out of the ordinary until I checked the exit hole and found lots of small holes exiting her ribs.

The entrance would was 2 inches behind the shoulder and low in the rib cage(where the ribs get thicker). She was up hill from him so I half expected that. Upon butchering her the jacket seperated from the core at some point. Ribs were broken on both sides of the body. The core exited but most of the jacket pieces were found on the exit hole side just under the skin.

Load :280 Remington
139 grn Hornday Interlock (yes, plain ole bullet)
2600 fps

This was a first for us. Never had the good ole hornady come apart like that. Several other deer were taken with the same load and the situation did not repeat itself.
 
Posts: 1268 | Location: Newell, SD, USA | Registered: 07 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have had the 139 .284 interlok perform perfectly many times myself. There are always variables and some of them no bullet design can overcome. My load for this bullet pushes it at 28oo fps out of my 7x57 and so far I have had no recovered bullets on deer but a few on feral hogs and they were pretty much intact. I moved tp heavier bullet for the hogs though and now the 160 grain Speer spitzer gets to go hunting most of the time.
 
Posts: 2899 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  American Big Game Hunting    Re: Hunting bullet failures on whitetails????

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia