Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
there are 7X57, 7X65R, 7X64, 7mm rem mag, 280, 284, and a few others. what is the best and why? we all know that they are all better than any 8mm!!! | ||
|
<257 AI> |
I would vote for the one that started it all, the 7X57. It has plenty of power when built on a strong rifle with moderate recoil. ------------------ | ||
<siviter> |
I would also vote for the 7x57 or its short twin the 7mm 08. Handloaded to take advantage of their potential there is little they cannot do. | ||
one of us |
I realy love the 280. It to me is perhaps one of the most ideal deer cartridges. Its fairly flat shooting and is virtualy recoiless. It makes an excilent elk round to add. | |||
|
<siviter> |
I would also vote for the 7x57 or its short twin the 7mm 08. Handloaded to take advantage of their potential there is little they cannot do. | ||
one of us |
Well, hell, I might as well be different here. I have to vote for my 7mm Weatherby Magnum. I think this is a very over looked cartridge. I have little trouble shooting 160 grain Nosler Partitions the better part of 3200 fps and let me tell you that shoots plenty flat and hits hard way out there. As much as I like that Weatherby 7mm, if I wanted a new 7mm rifle, I would have a good gunsmith build a 280 Ackley Improved. Very impressive performance with a racy looking cartidge. I watched a buddy kill a near record book antelope with one at an easy 450 yards in Wyoming, it dropped like a rock! Anyway, thats my vote. R F | |||
|
<Bily Lovec> |
the question should be: is there a bad 7mm cartridge ?? | ||
<Steve H> |
The best 7mm Cal. is the one you are comfortable and confident with (same applies to any caliber) and are able to place the bullet where you aim it.
| ||
<Hal S> |
I don't think you can classify all the 7mm cartridges in the same category. I think there are 2 different categories - The 7-08 and 7x57 type cartridges and the various 7mm magnums. The biggest strength for all the 7mm's is the great variety of bullet choices. You can load down for varmints and deer size animals and up for elk or bigger animals. So here are my 2 choices for the perfect 7mm rifles - 7mm-08 for it's light recoil, inherent accuracy, and short action which makes for an easy to carry and easy to shoot rifle. My vote for the magnum would have to be for the 7mmSTW. When you want a magnum, they don't get much more magnum than the 7STW. 175 grains at 3000+ fps - nuff said! So I changed the question a bit, but those are my 2 choices. | ||
<Bill> |
I like them all, especially the 280, 7 rem and 7 STW. My personal favorite is the 7 Rem, as one can find ammunition for it in many places, where other calibers may be hard to come by. My current load is a 160 Aframe at 3077 fps from a 24" tube. | ||
<allen day> |
I'll vote for the 7mm Remington Magnum. Allen | ||
<buffalo_buster> |
My vote goes to 7 STW. BB | ||
one of us |
I vote the 7mm Rem Mag...10 points I vote the 280 Remington...6 points ------------------ | |||
|
<DuaneinND> |
7x57- Just because | ||
<AKI> |
Jameister. As always it�s more a question about good or bad or should I say appropriate bullets for a specific job. I have a 7mmRemMag and a 7x33 Sako (usable water volume 22.3gr, 2600fps with Sakos roundnose 79gr SP and FMJ). The 7x33 is very powerless in our magnumworld, but considered one of the best on roe deer: Instand death and no meat destruction. The 7mmRM was a disapointment, as it provides few benefits ower my 30-06. Only with highpressure loads of scertain powders (N560) and extended ranges will it do better than the 95 years old -06. I�m not saying it�s bad at all, just that it�s not that much better compared to nonmagnum and much older designs. To get a real step up from the very good (excellent accuracy, lots of power with reasonable powder charge, low recoil, leight rifles etc) midrange 7-08 and 7x57 an STW is called for. A 7mmRM has an edge too, but only with high pressures. JMHO, AKI | ||
one of us |
quote: Actually, I think there are three categories: the two you mention, plus a third in between those two. That third class contains the 280 and its twin the 7x64, and the 284 Winchester. These three produce velocities that are an order of magnitude greater than the 7mm/08 and 7x57, and an order of magnitude less than the 7mm magnums. | |||
|
<Don G> |
I agree with LE270, I had a 284 Win when they first came out. I loved the cartridge, but "standardized" for a while on the 308. I think the 7-08 or 7x57 are great cartridges for deer and antelope. If I wanted a little more velocity for forkhorns/springbok I'd go with the 284. The bigger magnum cases are just barrel burners IMHO. My middle brother disagrees, as his main carry rifle is 7mmRemMag. Don | ||
One of Us |
I've owned and shot the 7/08, 7x57 and 280. While I recognize the strengths and validity of a 7mm on a magnum case, it has always seemed to me that magnums should start with the .308" bore and upwards... call me reactionary! Anyway, of those that I have experience with, I think the 280 is nearly ideal for its intended use... a wonderful balance of shootability, power, bullet weight, SD's, etc... heck, I guess those are the virtues that make the 7mm Mags such a standout in their field... ok, I just converted myself... my vote goes to the 7mm WSM! Brad | |||
|
one of us |
The 280 Ackley Improved because........I am going to have one built. You gotta believe. | |||
|
one of us |
Hi I'll vote for 7X64 or maybe 280 rem. this caliber is excellent. 140gr@nearly 3000 fps and 173 gr@ 2700 fps. it can almost do all a 7mm rem mag can do with less recoil blast. br danny | |||
|
<10point> |
7X57 Mauser | ||
<PrimeTime> |
I love the 7x57 and the 280. For a magnum though, definitely the 7mm Dakota. Awesome power and flat trajectory without that dang rim. My uncle shoots the 7mm/300 weatherby but I dig the Dakota. | ||
one of us |
Ahhhh, the magic sevens! The first rifle I ever bought was a 7mm rem mag, just after they cam eout, in a Mod 70 Winchester. I lugged that piece all over the Alaskan Arctic and made many a memorable kill with it. I now also have a 7 STW, which will in time achieve similar "classic" status. For the open country of Northern Alaska both have proven to be dependable performers. Neither has proven to be a "barrel burner" and shoot a a pleasing of bullet weights well. One of the things I love about the "sevens" is the ability to shoot the lighter weight bullets with good accuracy and retained velocity to long range. A very versitile caliber. A seven will do almost anything you need a rifle to do and do it well, several is not too many to have! | |||
|
one of us |
I am a 7mm fan as well. I have seen a lot of game dumped with most of the 7mm cartridges. My favorite bullet weight in .284 is the 160 grain. I like them all. For all around big game hunting in N.America especially in the N.West, I think the Rem. Mag ,the Wby.,the Dakota and the STW are the best. I use a 7mm Rem.Mag. and a 7mmSTW. myself. I am thinking about a 7mm Dakota, which would get my vote as the best. I have killed game with the smaller 7mm's but my confidence lies with the magnums. They are just as accurate in a hunting rifle and they do a better job past 300 yards, period.
| |||
|
one of us |
7x57. A gentleman among calibres. The 8x57 is pretty good too. | |||
|
<Herb D> |
I agree that the various 7mm cartridges are excellent for a variety of applications. However,I also believe the popularity contest of the 7mm mags will eventually come down to these two beltless wonders: 1. 7mm WSM At present my vote goes to the 7mm Ultramag. | ||
one of us |
Yeah... those two are real ballistic "wonders" | |||
|
one of us |
Hello I vote for the 7mm Remington; no more recoil than a 30-06 with much better ballistics in the lighter loads. I've pretty much settled on 140 grain loads as an all-around game-getter. Tom | |||
|
one of us |
Need I say more!! | |||
|
<dartonvpr> |
Think I would break that down even more. Consider the single shot pistol shooters as well. My choice for that would have to be the 7-30 waters with a 130gr SSP. The second class would go to the 284 with 140 gr for those midsize targets, the last would have to go to the 7mm rem mag with 160 gr for it's all around versatility. These are my personal choices, but you would never get me to turn my nose up at anything with a 7MM(.284) tacked on the name. | ||
<Bearhunter> |
7x57 Mauser, all that is needed. All the others are just extra burnt powder... | ||
<thomas purdom> |
For all of you who voted for the 7x57mm Mauser, you are, without a doubt, absolutely correct. And 7x57 ... need I say more! | ||
<10point> |
The best thing about the 7X57 is that its just plain fun to shoot. Some cartridges are work, some are a pain in the butt, some are just plain hard. But the 7X57 ? Now thats a FUN round to both load and shoot. I'd love the Browning BLR Lightening lever-gun in 7X57. Now that would be fun, no, I mean FUN!!!!.........good shooting.............10 | ||
one of us |
A properly put together 7x57 with a 06 lenth magazine and a long throat that matches the magazine so bullets can be seated way out. I can seat a 175 gr. half way to the cannalure.. Surprisingly enough my 7's, everyone I've built, shot the 130 gr. Speer into a inch or better, defying all theory exclaimed by the gun scribes of the world... I have never seen a M21 or 22F Brno that wouldn;t shoot any bullet weight and they are all set up in this same manner......... With this setup I can easily match the 280 Imp. and crowd the 7 Mag. In fact beat the factory loaded 7 Mag., but only with one powder, H414.... I normally use a 175 gr. Nosler Partition at 2700 plus a mite in my long throated Brno..I won't give the load because someone might try it in a standard chamber and thats a definate no no....I have shot that load for 30 years and it has taken some of the worlds baddest critters and did it in style. I shoot the 160 Nosler at 2900 plus in this gun. The long throat is just another way of improving a cartridge, I've often thought that if you improved the 7x57 and incorporated the long throat with it, you could really kick it up, but I wouldn't want to do that on my collectable old Brnos. PO Akley told me that he had done that and found it didn't quite work that way as the long throat or the blown out shoulder just about "squeezed all the juice out of that lemon" but was the best cartridge that he had ever improved. ------------------ | |||
|
<Pumba> |
Jameister, The best 7mm cartridge is either a 300 Winchester or a 300 Weatherby with 200 grain premium bullets. Good Hunting ! | ||
<thomas purdom> |
I knew a .30 would sneak in here on this 7mm forum! Good hunting to you too! | ||
<Adirondack Joe> |
If Jack O'Connor was still with us, he would choose the same one I choose - 7x57. For the hunting most people do, really, this is plenty of gun. Jack referred to the 7x57 as "Big Punch in a Little Case" which it certainly is. Even the older, low pressure loads with 140 grn bullets work well on whitetails out to 300 yds. The older 175 grn loads are good 150 yd moose and elk busters. At modern pressures, however, the cartridge really starts to show its worth. The bullet selection is greater than its short cousin, the 7mm-08, which doesn't lend itself to heavier bullets in most chambers. Plus, the greater case capacity allows it to tread on the heals of the 280. Really, for the types of hunting most of us do, the 7x57 covers it all. The big 7 magnums really have nothing to offer but a superfluous abundance of speed, recoil, and muzzle blast. | ||
<David J. Moses> |
I guess it would have to be the 7x64 in bolt rifles and the 7x65R in all others. It has more jam than the 7x57 without requiring a larger or longer action. The globetrotter would be better off with the 7mm Rem Mag since it is cheaper and available everywhere. But it is hardly better than the 7x64. I have had both the 7x57 and the 7 Rem Mag and feel that the Rem is not much use at close ranges. The 7x57 needs about 200 fps more and that is why the 7x64 gets my vote. However you cut it, no 7mm round gives the long range power that a .30 mag will since it just can't. Which is why I feel that the STW, Weatherby and others of that ilk don't make much sense. The 7-08 is also pretty useless since it gives the same ballistics at higher pressure than the 7x57. So what if it fits in a "short" action? No one except Americans seem interested in short actions anyway. If the field in 7mm had to be thinned, I would say that the 7x64/7x65R and the .280 Rem cover it nicely. If you think you need more power, the next step would be one of the .30 Magnums, not a hot-rodded 7. | ||
<JOHAN> |
Fellows Pumba I think you should start over and read the question again. 7mm not 30 cal!!
Both calibers have long necks which means that you don't have to stick the bullet down in the engine room and case volume are about enough for good velocity and downrange peformance. The 7mm wby is not far behing the 7 STW. The 7mm dakota is just as fast as 7 STW, but shorter and with longer neck. All three caliber also has good brass, which can't be said about the RUM cases. 7mm are a overlooked caliber, a good 160 grainer in 284 will outperform a 180 grainer in 30 cal all day long. If you want more bang for bigger game than 284 can offer, pick a red hot 338 with 225-250 grainers. [This message has been edited by JOHAN (edited 07-09-2001).] | ||
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia