Without a question, I would always choose to shoot of sticks. A steady rest is critical in shot placement no matter how good of a off hand shot you think you are.
Death Merchant
There are other cheap alternatives such as rose poles which are sold in garden centres in the UK. Consider a doubled up Hoover drive belt on each leg to stop them clattering together � but you only really need this if the legs are dead straight (as they are on the rose poles).
They are great for deliberate shooting, and make the average hunter capable of taking precision shots at much longer ranges than otherwise possible. I certainly consider the standing sticks preferable to standing sitting or kneeling offhand. I would not dream of going into the woods without a pair. If you need to take a quick shot offhand simply drop the stick and do it. They double as a great rest for binos when glassing. Also they aid your balance if trying to cross broken country while closing on an animal.
Regards
I have seen more game lost while hunters fiddled around with a bunch of damn gadgets than any other way....It's plain disgusting.
Big oversized variable power scopes, huge bulky legs attached to the forends of their rifles, shooting sticks, and range finders are the most problem oriented objects...
A better solution to the above is to spend those thousands of dollars on ammo and practice, practice or simply learn to shoot.
Every time I watch one of those TV hunting shoes and everybody looks like a damn tree with all their camo and sitting in a deer stand on top of that, and their guns are SS and plastic in huge calibers with huge scopes and gobbled up forends and are running their heads 1000 miles per hour while a deer is 20 ft. from them, they have a literal bench rest and at the shot hair flies off the gut and they call it a good shot and walk out and claim their prize, give me a break..
A hunter with simple, clean, slim, and well balanced rifle with a 20mm objective lens scope of no more than 5x will kill while the others fiddle around getting things set up...
You sure hit a nerve this time old boy, but that is my unwavering opinnion, no compromise!
------------------
Ray Atkinson
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
A better solution to the above is to spend those thousands of dollars on ammo and practice, practice or simply learn to shoot.A hunter with simple, clean, slim, and well balanced rifle with a 20mm objective lens scope of no more than 5x will kill while the others fiddle around getting things set up...
I have to agree completely. Being able to take a quick but well aimed shot, with simple gear you can trust is 99% of the battle. Practice, practice.
Canuck
Imagine a scenario where 98% of shots are taken standing, where deer are never shot other than stationary and very near broadside or front on, where identification of sexes can take minutes not seconds, where the deer often have to be tracked in a scope before finaly turning broadside and being shot and where the deer can be small enough that you should be able to hit a CD at 100 yards having been in the aim for as long as a minute or so.
This scenario is a fair representation of UK woodland stalking and as a result not using sticks is a needless handicap.
I would estimate that it takes very, very little more time for me to take a shot with a stick than it would without. I'm assuming I'm carrying the rifle slung.
[
[This message has been edited by 1894 (edited 07-31-2001).]
Whether stalking deer or woodland rabbits I use a pair of 6 foot long hollow fibreglass tubes which started life as fishing rod blanks. Tied together near the top and wrapped in cammo tape, they serve me well.
------------------
I'll rest on a rock or tree, or my pack. Or I'll sit down, kneel, whatever works. If I was in a situation where sticks were normal, I'd probably use them.
Although I have two articles of clothing that are camo, I really don't like camo. I really don't understand the trend to put camo on everything. I think the last thing I want in camo is something I can lose, like a flashlight or knife.