The Accurate Reloading Forums
Which 300mag M98 would you prefer,?

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3411043/m/613101073

19 November 2005, 06:55
Woodjack
Which 300mag M98 would you prefer,?
Its not abig deal but which would you prefer,

A std98 length Granite Mauser in 308 NormaMagnum
or,
Magnum length 98 300H&H?

The Norma would have a heavier chamber area with 25"tube .550" muzzle(more aggressive taper) and a Blackburn widebox(same capacity as a dropbox)
The 300H*H would have a slimmer profile chamber area, with same length barrel/muzzle Dia.
19 November 2005, 07:25
vapodog
everything else being equal I'm all for the venerable .300 H&H.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
19 November 2005, 16:20
<JOHAN>
Woodjack,

308 Norma magnum thumb thumb

Your need a matched pair of Nils Kvale's darlings, 308 and a 358 Norma Magnum Smiler Smiler Smiler

308 Norma built on standard action will be a handier rifle... I would use magnum mauser action for 416 Rigby, 450 Rigby, 505 Gibbs etc.

Cheers
/JOHAN
19 November 2005, 20:44
<allen day>
If I were employing a Granite Mountain action, I'd certainly build a 300 H&H over any other 300 magnum chambering. It's a natural pairing, and the 300 H&H will do all that the 308 Norma will do, plus it'll feed better as well. That half-inch longer bolt-throw that the 300 H&H brings with it means absolutely nothing in the real world..........

AD