I've got a dilemma and although I'm new here, I fully believe there will be no shortage of opinions...
I've recently ordered a long and a short action from Montana Rifleman. My dilemma is what cartridges to choose. Here's what I have now and what I plan/hope to hunt over the next several seasons...
6.5/06; 7mmRem; .300 Win; .300 Weatherby, .338 Win; .358 Norma; 375H&H. Deer, antelope, elk, moose, black bear, and African plains game up to and perhaps including buff...
I could argue that I'm already covered and that I don't need any thing else but that's no fun... also, I don't ever envision building a .22 cal centerfire for use specifically on pdogs or the like...
Thanks for sharing your thoughts... and, I do reload.
Posts: 64 | Location: Indianapolis | Registered: 21 January 2003
For the long action you "need" to step up a bit and depending on your recoil tolerance one of the .416's sounds just right....my choice would be the Remington.
For the short action why not one of the new Winchesters or Remingtons...I would say the 300 WSM but you already have two big 30's.
Posts: 4360 | Location: Sunny Southern California | Registered: 22 May 2002
For a short action, look at the .243 Ackley Improved or the .250 Savage. Either is fine for pronghorn (my .243AI consistently kills pronghorns at 300yds.+).
For the long action (magnum, I presume), how about a .458 Lott? Big enough for bison, buffalo, elephant, or hippo, but you can load down to .458 Win. or even .45-70 levels for 'plunking' (500gr. bullets don't go 'plink', they go 'plunk'! ).
George
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001
Good ideas Jim.... don't know much about either yet. My concern would be that f they're anything like the 6.5x300WSM ie....big case/small bullet, they might be tough to reload for.
What are the powder capacities of the rounds?
Posts: 64 | Location: Indianapolis | Registered: 21 January 2003
I'd vote 250-3000 Small enough for varmints, large enough for deer, very pleasent to shoot, yet surprisingly powerful, very effisient cartridge. Did I mention it's a classic, anyone you talk to wants one!!
I like the idea of the 250 Savage or .257 Roberts. And, the 7x57 would be a good choice as I already have a supply of .284 bullets. I'll bet a 120gr. B-Tip from the 7x57 would be excellent for coyotes, deer and lopes!
Posts: 64 | Location: Indianapolis | Registered: 21 January 2003
Well I am fond of the 257 Roberts AI and the 7x57 std or AI. Yes in my 7x57 the 120 gr Barnes X really does a number on medium size game . I also like the 130 gr Speer or X. The 150-160 gr bullets also are really good at 7x57 velocities.
In the big action I would look at something in the 458 class the Lott sounds good but maybe a 450 Rigby would be better? That's if you don't mind the recoil .
Well, I've think I've got the short action narrowed down to the following, in no particular order: 1) .260Rem; 2) .250AI; 3) 7x57. And for the long action: 1) .416 Remington; 2).280 AI; 3) 8mm Remington Magnum (only because Col. Boddington speaks so highly of it)
Posts: 64 | Location: Indianapolis | Registered: 21 January 2003
I've bought 2 McMillan's already and I'm still going round and round about what chamberings to go with! I forgot to list the 25-284. There's sure a lot of fans for that one.
Posts: 1346 | Location: NE | Registered: 03 March 2002
quote:Originally posted by DavidReed: For the short action how about a .275 Rigby(7x57 Mauser) or a .257 Robert's.
I don't recommend building a 7X57 or .257 Roberts on a short action because this would require you to seat long bullets very deep in the case. Better to build these calibers on a long action. For calibers based on the .308 case or the .250 Savage case, the short action is quite OK.
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001