THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  American Big Game Hunting    Do you still stick to a bucks-only mentality?

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Do you still stick to a bucks-only mentality?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
It seems that every few weeks I read about all the problems that deer overpopulation is causing across the US. Increasing deer collisions, forests being overeaten, plant species becoming rarer as they are eaten by starving deer herds. Just 3 weeks ago my little brother totalled his truck after hitting a deer. Every time I go out to our woods, I see tree seedlings I planted chewed to the ground by deer. While I can understand some losses, near 100% is insane! Why don't state wildlife management departments start pushing doe hunting instead of bucks? One buck can impregnate dozens of does, so the does are the limiting factor. We as hunters can't make the claim that we are helping to maintain a balance if we don't shoot does! The animal rights hippies may be right for once (I can't believe I just said that). If we don't hunt does, we aren't doing nearly enough to control the population. How about a requirement that you must shoot a doe before you can shoot a buck? Or have two openers, the first for does only, and then a week or two later for bucks. Donate the meat to a food shelter if you can't eat it all. Just SHOOT MORE DOES, please! It's gotten to the point where I only accepted doe hunters on our land this fall, making it very clear that they had permission only to shoot does. Unfortunately, I know that won't do any good, as extra does will just migrate in from neighboring farms. Sigh.

Sorry for the rant, just had to get it out of my system. I've invested hundreds of dollars and man-hours into planting trees, shrubs, and native wildflowers around our farm for the wildlife, not just deer. I've been cutting down invasive buckthorns, honeysuckles, and garlic mustards as they are nonnative and harmful to native species. I've even gone so far to grow my own trees and shrubs from seed, as I need hundreds every spring and every fall. Then I see so many of them chewed to death. No flames intended towards anyone here who doesn't hunt does. Ok, I can take a breath now. Peace.
 
Posts: 167 | Registered: 11 December 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Longbob
posted Hide Post
In the 6 years that I have been hunting whitetails, I have shot one buck. I have shot a total of 17 does. How's that for a ratio. [Smile]
 
Posts: 3512 | Location: Denton, TX | Registered: 01 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've shot well over 100 does in my hunting years.
 
Posts: 1450 | Location: Dakota Territory | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
<Ranger Dave>
posted
I shoot the first decent sized deer that comes in front of my rifle.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In WV the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has been trying very hard to encourage the harvesting of does. The gun doe season is now three weeks long. The bow deer limit is 3 of which one of the last two must be a doe. Muzzleloader season is either sex.

Still, there are a GREAT many more bucks taken than does.

Personally, I take what mother nature puts in front of me until the last one on the ticket for each season ... then I look for the big guy. Have had a pretty nicely filled freezer most years. Doe are better eating than are bucks for sure.

In my area, I still see more deer killed on the roadways than I see taken by hunters. If we have a harsh winter this year the winter kill will be awful!
 
Posts: 6199 | Location: Charleston, WV | Registered: 31 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Damn, come down here and replant some of that non-native honeysuckle, my deer love it.
 
Posts: 17099 | Location: Texas USA | Registered: 07 May 2001Reply With Quote
<1_pointer>
posted
Valerius Geist, one of the most repected biologist of cervids, feels that one should have to present the lower jaw of 10 yearling deer (mostly does) before being issued a buck tag.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 8MM OR MORE
posted Hide Post
Hunting is about many things to me, not the least of which is the quality of the food. Give me a doe whitetail or cow elk anytime for the best eating. Bucks and bulls are OK to, but I seem to end up with more sausage/hamburger from them. But, I can live with either one, beats beef no matter what, doesn't it? Some of the best sausage ever is 1/2 of a beef, 1/2 of a pork carcass, whole carcass of white tail, whole carcass of bull elk, deboned and ground/mixed, smoked. Those were the days!!
 
Posts: 1944 | Location: Moses Lake, WA | Registered: 06 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dutch
posted Hide Post
For me it is like this. I want to have a representative rack on the wall of each species I hunt.

After that, I really don't care what I kill, as long as it tastes good. Rocky Mountain Oysters aren't high on that list..... JMO,Dutch.
 
Posts: 4564 | Location: Idaho Falls, ID, USA | Registered: 21 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JLHeard
posted Hide Post
The NY Times just ran an article on deer in the eastern US that mentioned the problem of getting some hunters to accept the doe seasons.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/12/science/life/12DEER.html?8isc

Very interesting quotes:

quote:
Except in a few favorable situations, sharpshooting, trapping, birth-control darts, repellents and other tactics are not having a big impact, he and other experts say.

Expanded hunting, considered by many experts to be the best hope of controlling numbers, has its limits as well. For example, most hunters, and most states' hunting regulations, still favor shooting bucks, even though the best way to control populations is to kill females.

Some states are changing regulations in ways that could cut deer numbers, but hunters are resisting. Others are expanding seasons and the number of deer a hunter can kill, but federal wildlife officials note that hunters are a graying population, with fewer each year to make a dent. In any case, controlled hunts staged in suburbs often run up against strident opposition from animal welfare groups.

quote:
Changing Hunters' Habits

In most places around the country, many wildlife experts say, the biggest effect on deer populations will probably come through changing hunting practices.

The Sand County Foundation, a Wisconsin land conservation group, has a decade-old program allowing hunters to kill deer on preserve and private lands, as long as they shoot a doe or two before taking a buck.

"The whitetail deer is a lovely, engaging animal, and it thrills me to see them, even now when they're causing so much trouble," said Dr. Brent M. Haglund, the president of the foundation. But now that numbers are so excessive, balance must be restored, Dr. Haglund said, and the only realistic way to do that is for hunters to replace the country's long-vanished predators.

The cost of doing nothing has risen too far, he said. "Deer collisions are killing people," he said. "That to me is the most legitimate reason to look for sound, sustainable ways to reduce deer density."

In Pennsylvania, where exploding deer populations have erased tree seedlings and trillium and other wildflowers from many forests, game officials have begun reshaping hunting regulations, less to suit the desires of hunters for ever-bigger herds and more to suit the needs of ailing ecosystems.

The main changes are designed to encourage the shooting of does instead of bucks. This initially rankled many hunters.

Dr. Alt, on the Pennsylvania Game Commission, said he used to think his biggest on-the-job hazard was crawling into a den to study hibernating bears. But when he joined the commission three years ago, he said, he was heckled and hounded at crammed public meetings where angry hunters attacked his ecological approach to deer.

Attitudes have started to change, he said. Expanded seasons for antlerless deer, most of them female, are becoming popular and are expected gradually to reverse the proportions of killed male and female deer. Eventually that should stabilize the herds.

But the slow spread of chronic wasting disease, a brain infection of deer and elk similar to mad cow disease, may impede efforts to use hunters to manage deer.

In Wisconsin, where the disease most recently appeared, applications for hunting licenses have dropped 25 percent to 30 percent this year, said Peter J. Gerl, the executive director of Whitetails Unlimited, a national private hunting group based there.

Officials say there is no evidence that the disease can cross to humans. But some have advised people to avoid meat from deer taken in areas where the disease has been found and to use caution in butchering their animals, avoiding contact with brain or other tissues that could hold the viruslike protein particles that cause the illness.

This fall, hunters have been helping Wisconsin officials kill 25,000 or more deer in the zone where about 3 percent of a sample of deer tested positive for the infection. But in the long run, the outbreak could discourage hunting in the state, harming the economy and increasing deer numbers.

 
Posts: 580 | Location: Mesa, AZ | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It is hard for some to break tradition by harvesting does. My dad won't even apply for a permit in the last 10-12 years. One proposal was you earn a buck, by harvesting a doe first. I won't be suprised if something like "X" point before a harvest a whitetail. Some place do that with elk already. Some hunter are starting to see that has to change. We took 19 deer with only two bucks in our camp. Some areas are just getting to be overpopulated. This is new for the DNR to manage.

Hcliff
 
Posts: 305 | Location: Green Bay, WI | Registered: 09 September 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've been in some of the quality deer management (QDM) areas in Wiscosnisn and was generally favorably impressed by the large number of nice bucks

I try to follow QDM if I have a choice. Which means no Bucks under 15 inches (antlers past the ears)and if no buck comes out, take does.

So far I have only taken 1 buck that met the qualifications but I have put deer in the freezer most years.

Luckily with the abundance of deer in my area we either have automatic choice of sex or can get a bonus tag that lets us take a doe, so there usually no difficulty adding to the freezer.

[ 11-16-2002, 01:02: Message edited by: rockhead ]
 
Posts: 562 | Location: Northern Wisconsin, USA | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
If it's brown, it's down. -Fred
 
Posts: 207 | Location: Nicolet National Forest, WI, USA | Registered: 21 January 2002Reply With Quote
<Russ D>
posted
Geo,

This is one hot button issue.In South Carolina it goes back to when the fish and game guys did a restocking program here.We had very few deer except in certain areas. The mandate was originally to leave the does alone so they could propagate. Well, that was then and this is now as they say. Some folks just won't give it up.We try very hard in our club to try and get some semblance of a decent buck to doe ratio. We apply for doe tags and last year we got 35 for our club. We filled them all but one was an accidental buttonhead.I think we killed 5 or 6 bucks.We do the trophy management routine letting the young bucks walk and concentrating on the 3 1/2 year olds and up.It just kills me to go to the processors' and hear guys talking about all the bucks they've killed. 'Cause you know they're 18 month old 4 and 6 points that won't ever grow into the kind of deer we're looking for.Why not shoot does and get a decent buck to doe ratio established so that we'll have a real rut to hunt in. Added benefit of competition is a better herd where only the best bucks breed. I feel better now. Russ
 
Reply With Quote
<FarRight>
posted
I agree completely. When I hunt it is for two primary reasons. First, I enjoy it--it gets me out with friends and family or gives me time to enjoy the outdoors by myself. At any rate it makes me feel alive. Secondly, for the meat. We may not be at risk of starving, but putting meat in the freezer sure helps. Buying beef can be expensive and frankly I prefer the taste and health qualities of venison to beef.
Trouble is we had a bad winter in 95 and 96 and they made it bucks only after that. The deer population was really hurt so they wouldn't let us shoot does. Or that is what the Pine Cone Cops told us. Now days they allow us to shoot white tail does opening week and that is it in most areas. Still largely bucks only and brow tined bulls. I shot a doe this year and didn't feel the worse for it--it's meat on the table. True I dream of huge bucks but when it comes down to it I can't eat the antlers.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of OldFart
posted Hide Post
In my young and single days, I would only shoot trophy bucks. I would hunt 3 states starting in mid August, and ending the end of the year. I was getting years of hunting experience each season. If I was going to ruin my hunt by shooting a deer, he was going to be something. I still shudder to think of some of the deer I passed up back then.
I no longer have the time or resources to hunt like I did then. But I still treasure the time I spend hunting, even does.
 
Posts: 700 | Registered: 18 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm about 50/50 and the bucks were no trophies either.
I'm not particular and have left my tag empty some years by passing up good does right at the start of the season.
I HATE filling a tag on the first day, I rather hunt not get anything than give up the fun of hunting by filling the first day.
 
Posts: 140 | Location: Saskatoon | Registered: 21 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In my area where I hunt people are of a mind set that all those does are the ones that make all those bucks. In some areas we are simply over run with them. I just come home from a weeks hunt where I was seeing 15-20 different does every morning. Our limit for does in that area can be up to four does for the season. I brought two of them home with me today. They simply taste too good.
 
Posts: 1018 | Location: Lafourche Parish, La. | Registered: 24 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
At my deer camp we typically shoot around 60 does a year and 5 or fewer bucks. We have a very good buck-doe ratio and it's done wonders for the trophy quality of the bucks we do take. Unfortunately the rest of the state doesn't fare so well. Our state law allows 3 does and 3 bucks to be taken a year with an additional two does taken by archery or muzzleloader. Until a couple of years ago it was 5 does a year with the extra 2 allowed for archery and muzzleloader. I personally feel it should be unlimited does and one buck with a minimum inside spread of 15", but I don't write the game laws. The biologists are big proponents of QDM but the hurdle is getting it past the legislature. A lot of the legislators are old hunters who abhor the thought of shooting a doe. A lot of the older hunters in the population are very vocal in their opposition to shooting does and their squealing wins out over sound biology. The results of this are additional restrictions on shooting does in certain counties. In my county (which has the highest deer densities and lowest body weights in the state) the season for shooting does was closed most of last year. The reason was the state representative for this area was against shooting does and he wouldn't let the bill setting the seasons out of committee unless they re-wrote it to exclude doe hunting in his area. Never mind that his district is the most overpopulated in the state, the very area where the does need to be most heavily culled.

To make a long story short, the problem we have here is the politicians control the seasons instead of the biologists. Until some of these old politicians die off and we get some responsible people in office nothing's going to change.
 
Posts: 1173 | Registered: 14 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hell,I love all you bucks only group,two hunt clubs that I work with always invite me on the doe days because they know I'll take them,what little time i get to hunt, i look forward to the meat i could care less about the horns,besides i like donateing to Hunters for the hungry,here in VA.
 
Posts: 1529 | Location: Tidewater,Virginia | Registered: 12 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Pa.Frank
posted Hide Post
This year in PA, they put in antler restrictions. As a result, license slaes were down, by about 300,000 so far. GOOD!! There's tooo many assholes in the woods anyway.

There are three of us hunting this hyear, the kids are all away at school but between three of us we harvested 7 does and three 7 pointers for a total of 10 deer. 9 were with a bow & arrow and one was with a muzzleloader.

I attribute our success to fewer idiots in the woods on weekends. Only serious hunters.

We would have shot more IF:
1. We had more tags. and
2. We had somewhere or somebody to donate them to.

There is a program in Pa called "Share the Harvest", but even though you can donate your deer, it still costs you $75+ to "donate" it. There are a very few processors that will not charge you to donate a deer, but they are fast disappearing.

I like killing deer, but can't afford to donate more than one or two a year so, what are your suggestions?
 
Posts: 1984 | Location: The Three Lower Counties (Delaware USA) | Registered: 13 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In Texas, where almost all deer hunting is on privately-owned land, it is the responsibility of the landowner to manage the herd.

I placed a restriction on the paid hunters on my place of two deer each, no more than one buck. After the end of the regular season there is a does-only season of two weeks. I'll check the total kill and then go in with family members and guests to shoot enough does to bring the doe/buck kill ratio to at least 2/1. If you do this for several years, the proper sex ratio and population can be better-achieved.
 
Posts: 13263 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Getting back to the subject of overpopulation: I get to talk to folks who come here from up north/northeast and tell me of hunting seasons that last about TWO WEEKS!!!!????? How the hell can folks complain about overpopulation when they don't even have a season (relative to here approx 110 days straight for bow and approx 80 days of firearm season)? We even do not have a tagging system. If you stop at six deer it is by your honesty. And we have plenty of deer, buy they are not starving and we don't hardly ever hear of car crashes with deer. Can anyone tell me if they have indeed extended hunting seasons in the northeast/midwest?
 
Posts: 323 | Location: Keithville, La. USA | Registered: 14 February 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Pa.Frank
posted Hide Post
Mr. Wilson,
Remember that you have a continuous growing season doen there, and usually no drought problems. Up here in Yankeeland everything turns brown by the end of October and doesn't get green again till April/May. That's a long time for our critters to go without their veggies. The bottom line is, as prolific as deer are, there just isn't enought food available to support enough of them to be able to harvest deer in numbers like that year after year. Maybe when the polar caps melt from global warming [Roll Eyes] we'll be able to have a "real" deer season!! [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 1984 | Location: The Three Lower Counties (Delaware USA) | Registered: 13 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm pretty well set in my ways. I hunt the male of the species. If anyone invited me to hunt doe/cow I'd probably turn the deal down. I know people who would enjoy the hunt, and I'd rather they went in my place.

I shot a number of doe early in my career, and when it was required. One lease near Iraan, Texas asked you to kill a doe if you had already taken a buck. I complied.
 
Posts: 13919 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
GEO,
This morning,Deer Season opened,here,in New York.
The only deer that I saw were two does.
As soon as I identified them,I relaxed,and just watched.I have never shot a doe on opening day.
I used to hold off shooting does for the first week,but for the last few years,only one day.
Tomorrow,I'll be looking for them.
Frank
 
Posts: 202 | Location: Newburgh,New York Orange | Registered: 21 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i try to get a buck with my buck tag but i do shoot does. i got a mulie doe this year and can get a whitetail with my muzzle loader if i want. ill be looking for a good buck this weekend.
 
Posts: 159 | Location: Saskatchewan  | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'll shoot a doe in a heartbeat. Especially whitetail, the best meat I know.
 
Posts: 36231 | Location: Laughing so hard I can barely type.  | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
shoot does only on the last day of an either sex hunt. IN the western states we seldom get a chance to choose, either you have a doe tag or you have a buck tag. similar for elk, very few either sex elk hunts around. this year I did pass on a legal cow elk. Why would someone fly out of state, charter flight in, and hike five miles with a spike camp to shoot a skinhead cow elk? Passed on several small bucks for the same reasons. Now if we had a local hunting season in Arizona, then meat hunting would be a different story.

Same as shooting a spike buck: why when you can hunt up a decent buck?

Things are way different back east where populations are exceeding capacity.
 
Posts: 902 | Location: Denver Colderado | Registered: 13 May 2001Reply With Quote
<Sika>
posted
Here in NJ, in Bow season, we have to shoot a doe to get a buck tag in most zones. Because the bow season is divided into two seperate seasons, you can kill two bucks only if you kill two does first. However, the firearms season is two bucks, largely due to the influencee of the hunting clubs.
I usually take 3 or 4 does a year, and 2 or 3 bcuks, so I know I'm doing my part.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ElCaballero
posted Hide Post
Here in Missouri the dept of conservation has opened the gun season 2 days, started a weakend long youth only hunt, only sell any deer tags that are good state wide, allow hunters to use left over tags during muzzle loading season, and started a left over tag antlerless only season in early Dec. MDC also offers 2 or 3 any deer tags for bow season.
As a land owner I got a free any deer tag and drew two antlerless only bonus tags. My father-in-law and a friend of his hunted with me the first three days of the regular season and we checked in 3 bucks. I feel a little guilty. [Wink] Although I am trying to build numbers on my ranch as I have hopes of offering some guided hunts in the future. With this in mind we took two decent bucks (for my part of Mo) and one that didn't show very much promise of a decent rack.
 
Posts: 2095 | Location: Missouri, USA | Registered: 02 March 2002Reply With Quote
<OTTO>
posted
Here in MN we have an all season deer license. 1 buck and 1 antlerless during any of the open seasons statewide. Between myself and family we had 5 tags to fill. My first goal in shooting deer is meat 1st ego later. I won't shoot a yearling but all else is going down. The 1st deer this year was a small 6 point by my son. The next was a nice sized spike by the wife and mine was the largest doe I've seen yet. We still have 6 days of the rifle season left. I still possess a buck tag that I will hunt for in the muzzle loader season. Now that one will be an ego tag. 3 deer in the freezer is enough of a start to look for the big one.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I hunt Missouri, Nebraska and Kansas. I have a total of 7 doe tags and 2 either sex tags. I will shoot what comes in front of me since I donate most of the meat anyway. I did shoot a fair 10 point in MO last weekend, but only because with the number of deer in the areas I hunt, my personal minimum size limit is 9 points for bucks, and he passed. In Neb non-residents have to apply and they can not do that until the third drawing so I know that is almost a doe-only proposition and the unit I hunt gives you a free second doe tag when you buy the first, so it is not a bad deal after all. In Kansas, I will wait to make suer there are no good bucks around when I shoot does because there is a chance the buck will be huge if he is there, but I almost always fill all 4 doe tags there.
 
Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I shoot the first deer to walk in front of me. This year I got two does. It all looks the same in the frezer and does sure do taste good.
 
Posts: 598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 16 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by W. Wilson:
Getting back to the subject of overpopulation: I get to talk to folks who come here from up north/northeast and tell me of hunting seasons that last about TWO WEEKS!!!!????? ?

Where I hunt, the season only lasts 2 days. And we have to use slugs.
 
Posts: 196 | Location: MN, USA | Registered: 03 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Does anyone have a state by state ranking of the deer populations in the states?

As I recall Pennsylvania has one of the largest deer herds.

Jim B.
 
Posts: 1115 | Location: Huntsville, Alabama | Registered: 07 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JLHeard
posted Hide Post
I've passed up chances to put in for cow or doe seasons because I wanted my first big game animal to have horns on it. Now that I've done that (of course it was a spike on the last day of my hunt, but I could care less [Big Grin] ), I would be more than willing to go on a doe hunt. Although I'd still prefer to hunt a bull elk rather than a cow.

And I do wish we had either-sex seasons in AZ.
 
Posts: 580 | Location: Mesa, AZ | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
<bogio>
posted
I try for a nice buck with my any sex tag but buy as many anterless tags as legally possible as this is our main source of meat. If I don't find that good buck another doe goes to the locker.

Hard to convince people to shoot does when the hunting mantra is "Boone and Crockett." When was the last time a magazine encouraged anyone to go somewhere to hunt because the does are huge?

Brian
 
Reply With Quote
<FarRight>
posted
quote:
We even do not have a tagging system. If you stop at six deer it is by your honesty. And we have plenty of deer,
Yeah but them damn tiny southern deer [Big Grin] [Wink] [Razz]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
If I have to pay big dollars for a lease or hunt, I will only shoot something with BIG antlers, I have very little to no interest in does - of course I do very little whitetail hunting and about half the time I go home empty handed.
If I want venison I will shoot one of the corn fed exotic does (fallow, sika or red deer)that are plentiful and cheap in Texas - they are a lot better eating than most whitetails.
One answer would be to grant buck tags ONLY after you present a doe to a check-in station..... (I can hear the screaming now already). Then allow only bucks with at least 4 points on one side to ba taken. It might actally make a difference in the herd composition after 3 years or so.
 
Posts: 258 | Location: Houston, Texas, USA | Registered: 18 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  American Big Game Hunting    Do you still stick to a bucks-only mentality?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia