Good advice you are getting, either of the above would get my vote as well (although I have not tried the North Forks, unfortunately). Both X and Partitions work well on heavy game. Because you are a bit small in bullet diameter for game chosen, going to 150 grs is a good idea. - mike
Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002
I used a 140g Swift A-Frame. 100 yards, went in on the point of the shoulder, found it just under the skin behind the ribs on the other side. It weighs 125g now and measures just over 1/2" on the mushroom.
Posts: 46 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 23 September 2003
My wife just shot a Shiras bull last Saturday with her .270. She was using Federal Premium factory ammo with a 150 grain Sierra Game King bullet. The first shot would have killed it, but she paid the insurance with a second. One very dead bull.
Posts: 4782 | Location: Story, WY / San Carlos, Sonora, MX | Registered: 29 May 2002
Shot my first moose with a .270. Used 150 gr Partitions and they worked great. Recovered one bullet on the far side against the skin. Moose did not take a step, fell where it was standing. JD
Posts: 323 | Location: Fairbanks AK | Registered: 27 August 2002
I have a customer in CO using his 270 Whby and our 113gr EXP Groove Bullet for his elk hunting. He is elk hunting now and I hope he gets one. If I were to use a 270 for moose I would use the 113gr EXP Groove Bullet - if you want the best penetration. On a double lung shot I have no doubt you would get a complete pass through.
Don
Posts: 263 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 13 March 2003
Another vote for the 160gr. NP. My rifle would give about 2800fps with it and grouped nicely. I personally only have hunted with the 130 & 150 NP but given my experience with them I'd say the 160 would do a good job at least on a lung shot.
Posts: 13115 | Location: LAS VEGAS, NV USA | Registered: 04 August 2002
150 grain Nosler Partitions. That's what they are made for. Shot a Woodland Caribou a couple of weeks ago. Bullet never stoped but did plenty of damage.
Rich Elliott
Posts: 2013 | Location: Crossville, IL 62827 USA | Registered: 07 February 2001
I have a six pack of your choice of beer that says any 130 gr. X, Groove, GS custom, or 140 Failsafe at 3,000-3,100 fps will do an in-an-out on a moose on a broadside shot. JMO, Dutch.
Posts: 4564 | Location: Idaho Falls, ID, USA | Registered: 21 September 2000
When a friend of mine in Wyoming finally drew a moose tag he used Winchesters 150 grain Power Point in his .270 and it worked perfectly as expected. Elk are tougher to kill than moose.
There are better choices for Moose than the 270 Win but the 140 grain Failsafe is as good or better than any for the job. Like Dutch says it will give complete penetration on the side shots. The trouble I have had with them is too much penetration and not enough expansion.
If I had but a couple to choose from, that makes it hard, but ultimately, I'd go with the 160 Partition, 150 TSX, or 150 AFrame. And I wouldn't think twice about any of those 3.
I've never killed a moose but from accounts I've read and heard, they're not that difficult to put down...compared to an elk.
Get the bullet in front of the diaphragm, and it's dead.
Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
It went through the right shoulder and hit the inside of the left shoulder (we could see the bruise) and deflected towards the abdominal cavity where we found it lodged between two ribs. This is the first x-bullet I have recovered.
IV
minus 300 posts from my total (for all the times I should have just kept my mouth shut......)
Originally posted by Atkinson: When did Mike start producing 270 bullets at Northfork, my brochures don't list them..<br /><br />I like the Nosler 160 gr. in the .270, its a great bullet...
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003
My wife's "normal" moose rifle is a M70 Super Grade .338 with 225 Partitions.
One day after freeze-up in the NWT we were looking for Barren Ground caribou and she had her M77 in .270 loaded with 130 Partitions. She happened across a nice bull moose at 200 yards, and one round through both shoulders killed him DRT. The bullet exited, which surprised me.
BTW, this is one more excellent reason for using a premium bullet. In zones where we might encounter a legal species bigger than that which we happen to be hunting, a GOOD bullet makes a clean kill on the bigger critter much more certain, I believe. (My better half still takes the .338 when actually hunting for bigger animals.)
Regards from BruceB (aka Bren Mk1)
Posts: 437 | Location: nevada | Registered: 01 March 2003
Penetration on a Moose is not that difficult but a large wound channel can be very beneficial. I would NOT use a monolithic from a 270 on a Moose, but if you do you may want to shoot for bone and plan on ruining some shoulder meat. Better to go with a Northfork or Accubond with their large diameter mushrooms IMO. Partitions will work fine as well. I would go with the heaviest bullet you can as getting close to a moose is not a problem.
Frankly I think a heavy Hornady, Speer or Sierra would be a better choice for moose as it will transfer more of its energy to the moose than an X or failsafe which is sure to pass right through. Especially from something as small as a 270.
The Monolithics have their place, I just dont think they are a good match in this particular case.
Posts: 10190 | Location: Tooele, Ut | Registered: 27 September 2001
I use the 160 Noslers and they have always worked well for me. I like the Trophy bonded as well. Not much of a Barnes fan for no reason other than my gun doesn't group well with them. I might try Swift A frames in the future.
Posts: 91 | Location: USA | Registered: 09 August 2005