THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
the killers were out
 Login/Join
 
<CAL9 from planet Fargo>
posted
I was walking through some cattails on my fathers farm this weekend (ND opening weekend), looking to fill my buck tag. I happened to jump a very large 5x5 and missed him. He circled back around me and made the mistake of crossing in the open near the road. There happened to be 6 carloads of hunters (3-4 per vehicle) on the road and they all got out and opened up on him. I stopped counting after 12 rounds were expended. Needless to say, he didn't survive. I saw at least five holes in his carcass, including one where his lower jaw should have been. He was no longer the magnificent animal that I had seen.

I saw quite abit of this type of activity this weekend. Large groups of hunters patrolling the roads with 2-way radios. Whenever they came across something it sounded like a war zone. If this is the future of deer hunting in ND, I quit.

CAL

 
Reply With Quote
<Loren>
posted
Every sport has slobs, don't let it get you down too badly. My experience has been that to get away from slobs you need to walk at least a mile from the nearest car access.
Slobs are seldom found far from their cars and are easily traced by the broken beer bottles they leave behind.

 
Reply With Quote
<Paul Dustin>
posted
These are the ones I turn in. They make all of us look bad and we do not need this with all the anti gun and hunting people out there
just looking for something to cry about.
 
Reply With Quote
<jagtip>
posted
Ditto to all of the above.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Now you know why folks need bean field rifles and magnums that can hit at 1000yds.
So they don't have to get very far away from their suv's.
 
Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001Reply With Quote
<heavy varmint>
posted
If this was on your fathers land post it.
 
Reply With Quote
<jagtip>
posted
Heavy varmint....Most butt holes like that can't read anyway.
 
Reply With Quote
<1LoneWolf>
posted
I like "things" as easy as you can get them. But, I stay in shape for hunting, because that's what it is about, a pursuit of game. You have to be in some kind of shape to keep up.

Those radio guys in their motorized vehicles, ain't hunting.......they're just playing with themsleves. It is more like a "Canned" hunt than any form of real hunting.

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
beemanbeme,
I agree with all the sentiments expressed here wholeheartedly. My experience is, however, that you could give these slobs a railgun and they still won't hit a barn broadside from inside the barn. Most of them will have inadequate equipment for the job at hand with scopes that have not been sighted in and the wrong ammo. Of those who have an expensive rifle, most fit a dreadfully cheap scope and I have seen a scope fitted back to front with the guy trying to shoot it. None of them have ever practised anything worth a damn before the season opened.

Those of us who shoot beanfield rifles and take game cleanly at longer distances bring a different set of skills to the field compared to those who stalk up close. Both types of hunting are right and ethical. I have seen skilled long range shooters shoot badly and having to follow up. I have seen stalkers wound animals and having to follow up. The point is that, just like you have off road racing and circuit racing and longboard surfers and windsurfers, one is not wrong and the other right. They are just different preferences and one should not class people according to their equipment.

------------------
Gerard Schultz
GS Custom Bullets

 
Posts: 2848 | Registered: 12 August 2002Reply With Quote
<ss8541>
posted
Well put Gerard. I carry a bean field rifle and I hunt farther in then many of the hunters on this page could walk in, much of that is due to year round training. I don't mind being in far enough that it takes 2 very physically fit men 6 hours to get a deer out. As long as I don't have to worry about road hunters. To me having to pack a deer out 6 or 7 miles in steep terrain makes me appreciate the territory I hunt.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fritz Kraut
posted Hide Post
I have always envied the americans their "free hunting" and lack of gun control, but reading this post I eventually see some advantages of our european system. Most european countries have some sort of "Hunter�s exam" for those who want to hunt. And the right to hunt is bound to ownership of the ground. Thus we most often don�t have to cope with this sort of maniacs in the field.

Here they would loose their hunting and gun licences - and would also get a room of their own in a prison for some time. Only poachers are hunting in this way.

I think those matters, which CAL9 from planet Fargo put on the table, are worth some consideration.

Fritz

 
Posts: 846 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 19 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Having lived, and having hunted in North Dakota, I can say that hunting is a bit different there. Flat expanses and bitter cold normally keep hunters to patrolling the roads until they happen upon a promising piece of real estate - that may hold a whitetail or two, or the possible mule deer on the Western side of the state.

They might call that road hunting elsewhere, but anyone that has hunted this type of terrain knows that game thrives in little pockets of cover, and that these pockets may be few and far between.

Tree stand hunting is not done to the extent that it is elsewhere (few suitable trees, very cold), and organized drives across open terrain, while great for red foxes, is normally a loosing proposition with deer. Deer hunting is all about driving from covert to covert and getting out and trying to find deer.

With that being said, this firing-squad type of hunting is just sad. That's all I can say about it. It is just piss-poor.

 
Posts: 6545 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 28 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Rob1SG
posted Hide Post
I'd use my cell phone on them. Call the game warden and follow them until he arrived.Maybe if he took all their guns and cars they would get a hint this is not hunting.
 
Posts: 1111 | Location: Edmond,OK | Registered: 14 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Cal9: Those guys should definitely be turned in. Slobs like that have no business hunting.

------------------
JD

 
Posts: 1450 | Location: Dakota Territory | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Deerdogs
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fritz Kraut:
I have always envied the americans their "free hunting" and lack of gun control, but reading this post I eventually see some advantages of our european system.



I quite agree. I admire the US for many things, but the "enthusiasm" brought on by a very short season and the apparent lack of any skill in some "hunters" is some thing I am glad I do not have to put up with.


------------------
Regards

Richard

 
Posts: 1978 | Location: UK and UAE | Registered: 19 March 2001Reply With Quote
<heavy varmint>
posted
I agree that most "buttholes" like that can't seem to read signs but it does give you legal ground to stand on when they go to far as was the case this time in my view. Most hunters know better but I still say that the ever popular so called "huntin shows" are going to raise a whole new breed of unethical hunters who actualy will not know that this type of thing is wrong.
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A couple of years ago north of Terrace, BC (500 mi north of Vancouver) I watched a bunch of assholes glassing a swamp for moose. Guys were in there stalking. One creep who was too bored/stupid to do anything else opened up at downhill about 800-1,000 yds on a big bull moose with his .300 WM. He walked hits shots in by splashes. On the last shot there was no splash but the moose stumbled, then got up. I insisted that the idiot go chase it, but when it didn't fall again the guy just said naww, I missed. At that point I left in disgust. It was impossible to tell which vehicle was his and booze was present, so I just figured I'd better get outta there while the gettin' was good. An hour previously I had been dowen there.

Doesn't stop me huntin' though. I just try to avoid the idiots.

 
Posts: 36231 | Location: Laughing so hard I can barely type.  | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Gee, BBBruce, it's been a zillion years since I was in Terrace. Brings back memories.

OK, this may be the worst idiot hunter story I've run into....

Several years ago, here in Utah, we had about five guys, probably drunk, open up on a deer a couple of hundred yards away. The only problem was that the "deer" was wearing hunter orange, packing on '06, and had his 12 year old son with him.

The "deer" and his son took refuge behind some rocks, and started waving their orange jackets and yelling, and these guys kept blazing away and laughing their heads off.

Finally, the "deer" had enough, and put a round through the open door of their pickup truck. He says you've never saw five guys sober up and head down the mountain so fast.

 
Posts: 2281 | Location: Layton, UT USA | Registered: 09 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
denton, you beat me to the punch,

Cal, if it's your father's land post it. if they trespass, send a 165grn warning their way, get the liscence plate number and call the warden on them.

Scum like this deserves to be stamped out as visciously as possible.

---------------------------------------------
when in doubt, do a nuclear strike

 
Posts: 1723 | Location: wyo | Registered: 03 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Gerard, you have, perhaps, a point. I would be the first to agree that you do have men (make that hunter, the ERA police may be out) that are equiped, conditioned, and practiced to harvest game under very trying conditions. HOWEVER, for each one of those, there are hundreds that can not. Yet the cannots (lets call them armchair great white hunters or agwh for short) read the posts, they read the articles and assume if they had a beanfield rifle or some sort of exotic 22-378 firing a 17gr pill at 9000fps they can make the same spectacular shoots and, as I said, won't have to get too far away from that cell phone in the suv. The "if I had a boat like Bill Dance, ergo, I could catch fish like Bill Dance" syndrome as it were. Thus my dirision. If it isn't warrented in your case, let it slide but it is certainly deserved by the majority.

 
Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm all for the rights of landowners, but I have to disagree on the "post it" advice.

Here's where I'm coming from:

I don't know if this still holds true or not, but my great uncle was the largest private landowner in the state of North Dakota. He never posted ANY of his property and was totally against the idea. I spent a good portion of my youth working with him on his farm so the philosphy sort of wore off on me. His son, who runs the farm now, has never posted any of his property to this day. If you want to see monster whitetail or Mule deer bucks taken, you should see the walls of this family! And that's with hundreds of other hunters out there.

(Out of respect I'm not telling what part of the state this is - if you lived near him you'd know)

The point is, ND does not have a great deal of public hunting land. Opportunity for the hunter is tight enough as it is in this country. Closing everything down because of a few slob hunters ultimately punishes the younger generation, and the legitimate hunter who is just looking for a place to go.

I'm not standing in anybody's way, so do what you have to do, but I think that its a funny for someone, who may live 80 or more years if they're lucky, to hold the notion that they own or have owned ANYTHING, or to believe that posting property is going to rid the world of slob hunters.

Sometimes a swift kick in the ass is the best solution. Hell, we're talking about North Dakota here - call up the Norwegian mafia if you have to Just punish the guilty.

 
Posts: 6545 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 28 August 2001Reply With Quote
<heavy varmint>
posted
aquavit,
I would have agreed with you a few years ago but since my Dad bought some acerage for us to use a few years ago I have seen first hand why so many post there land. It's not that we want to keep legit hunters out and most know that all they need do is ask but if it's not posted (at least in my area) then it is open to the slobs, posting is just more or less the first step you have to take to keep these yahoos from taking over, shooting holes through the cabin windows, shooting holes through the water tank, busting down locked gates, and hunting out of season on there 4 wheelers, things like that.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
heavy varmint is right! when you see those posted signs go up, you can usually say, "We did it to ourselves". Pogo Possum was right when he said, "We have met the enemy and it is us." I don't know how we as hunters and sportsment can address the problems. It just seems there are so many "in you face" types out there in anything you try to do. Not just hunting.
 
Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001Reply With Quote
<JK>
posted
Every state should have a law like Texas........No shooting from a public road.
 
Reply With Quote
<10point>
posted
I heard way to many "truckload volley's" when in CO. last year, some even re-loaded and volleyed again. Even if I wasnt sure they were "truckloads of jerk's emptying rifle's at a herd of Elk" my guide was sure of it.

Even tho I took a fine Bull, cleanly, the hunt wasnt the same after hearing all those fireing volley's. I saw so many cripple's, even many cow's and calves, in those huge herds of Elk, it just killed a part of me. To make it worse two of the guy's I hunted with each crippled a fine Bull, without recovering them.

One was shooting a rifle he had no business shooting, crippled and lost the best Bull of the week after a 100yrd shot, and the other was another of these "long range experts" and shot a fine Bull in the ass at 600 yrds. He didnt even walk down to check on the hit and Im told this was the second year in a row he crippled with his long range bullshit.

Frankly I'd rather sit , in peace, with my bow. I dont enjoy this kind of hunting and if I go rifle hunting again it will be backcountry wilderness.......................10

[This message has been edited by 10point (edited 11-18-2001).]

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Denton-

We have had a few instances like that around here,with idiots shooting at other hunters-and usually the other hunters where wearing blaze orange.

I've never had anyone shoot at me in the woods,but if someone does I will certainly not waste any time shooting back.I don't care if they think I'm a deer,they're trying to kill me.Plus,you don't know if it's some psycho who just wants to kill you and walk off or blame it on thinking you were game.

------------------
"Only accurate rifles are interesting"

 
Posts: 529 | Location: Humboldt County,CA | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
<migra>
posted
I've seen this kind of behavior before when I lived in northeast Montana (glorified North Dakota) In this case it was out of staters but the residents weren't totally innocent of this sort of foolishness either. I was watching a bunch of mulie does feed up out of a coulie. I could see the deer, a pickup load of "hunters" and my vehicle over the hill. I could see that the deer and the pickup were on a collision course. When the pickup load of whale belly, bacon back, fat ass, losers, saw the deer they all bailed out and started shooting. The problem was that the deer were on the horizon and my vehicle was over the hill from them. Said lardasses, wounded several deer got back in the pickup and drove off. I looked at my partner and said sarcastically "I hope I don't find a hole in my truck when we get back" Guess what? .30 corelokt through the back door of my ramcharger. I was thoroughly pissed and found them at the local watering hole that night. (very small town and they weren't hard to find) Of course they denied it and the local constabulary wouldn't do anything. They left town shortly thereafter and didn't show up the next year. However the following year they were back. Suufice it to say that revenge is a dish best served cold. Buttheads like this shouldn't be allowed to hunt, but we live in a free society and they are. I was told later that I should have called Montana Game and Fish. They would have investigated the matter and these losers probably would have been sent back to Minnesota without thier licenses. We need to police ourselves. Game and Fish can't be everywhere, nor do we want them to be.
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JK:
Every state should have a law like Texas........No shooting from a public road.

In British Columbia generally there is a statutory prohibition against shooting from public roads. Most highways have a quarter mile "no discharge of firearms" strip either side of centre line. It is used to stop road hunting. I don't think its generally enforced from the position of a guy hunting towards a highway from the bush. They generally wouldn't even notice if you walked in from bush-side and whacked your critter 300 yards from a quiet road. Many mainline logging roads get banned in regs. Most smaller logging roads are ok.

[This message has been edited by BBBruce (edited 11-18-2001).]

 
Posts: 36231 | Location: Laughing so hard I can barely type.  | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Nitroman
posted Hide Post
Gentlemen,
An interesting and possibly fatal tale. I was in my wife's village of Napakiak when she came out to call me. I went inside and everyone seemed very tense. They were glued to the radio. Two of my brother-in-laws were upriver and either some people had mistaken them for animals or it was a situation of the upriver folks telling the downriver folks not to be there.
As the story goes they heard a sharp CRACK! and then a boom. Having been in the military they knew what that meant. They ate dirt. After finding out where the dorks were they returned fire!! Last time there was a problem.
Maybe this should start happening to some of the Bozos down there? If people shot back, the Bozos would be a little more leery of shooting at anything.
 
Posts: 1844 | Location: Southwest Alaska | Registered: 28 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
After all the stories about idiots, maybe we ought to also remember that practically all the people you meet out hunting behave themselves responsibly, and are great fun to meet and swap stories with. It's too bad that we meet idiots, too. But the good news is that when it happens, it is unusual enough to draw a comment.
 
Posts: 2281 | Location: Layton, UT USA | Registered: 09 February 2001Reply With Quote
<migra>
posted
Denton,

Good point! I've been hunting for 25 years and only have one really bad story.

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have no personal experience where i hunt because most of the scum suckers pulled out before I turned of legal age to hunt (I mean anything, which in NY is 14 for small game and 16 for big game). However, from what I've heard there were a lot more of them who'd shoot up a forest like it was going out of style when I was 8 (the first year I started going up w/ my father and uncle on trips to "observe" which ultimately resulted in me sleeping and missing the 5-6am wake up and hike out).

------------------
When in doubt, do a nuclear strike.

 
Posts: 1723 | Location: wyo | Registered: 03 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
woops sorry for the double post

------------------
When in doubt, do a nuclear strike.

 
Posts: 1723 | Location: wyo | Registered: 03 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fritz Kraut:
And the right to hunt is bound to ownership of the ground.




Are you saying that in order to hunt on a piece of property you must own it?

 
Posts: 466 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 20 December 2000Reply With Quote
<Paladin>
posted
Fritz, the U.S. has both public and private lands, with gradations of authority over each. The vast bulk of hunters are aware of these and sensitive to them.

East of the Mississippi River, most hunting is on privately-owned land --farms and woodlands. Landowner permission must be gained first, otherwise the crime of Trespass is committed and the local sheriff will enforce the law if called. Nearly all of the hunters try to keep up good relations with the landowners who let them hunt.

However, there is a trend: city people who can afford to buy land now will buy rural land and immediately post "No Hunting, No Trespassing" signs. Depending on their attitude, this can either mean no hunting, or the usual hunting-by-permission. The signs preserve some legal rights and are an assertion of ownership.

State-owned public lands, such as State Forests, usually are open to hunting. However, it is best not to hunt there due to the "city" crowd using these areas. They tend to be excited, anxious to shoot deer, and not always able to identify their targets as well as they should. They merit each other's company....

Much of the western United States is public land, but that does not always mean public access is approved. In the interest of bandwidth, I should leave further discussion of the western hunting situation to others. I hope this helps your understanding of the situation, and that we do work with the problems you've seen outlined here. Certainly, there are many laws we can use to discipline people who need discipline.

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Interesting topic. I just got back from 2 weeks in northern Maine, where there are very few deer and in some areas very few hunters.

Land is almost entirely owned by timber companies that allow basically unlimited public access for recreation (hunting, fishing, camping, snowmobiling).

In the less pressured areas it would be newsworthy to see another hunter all day.

In the more heavily hunted areas you see lots of them. But hardly any of them will stray from the roads or the more recent logging trails. (After huddling over an impromptu campfire until 9:00 PM one night when I missed a turn around a saddle on the way back to the truck, I can tell you why ...)

This isn't always unproductive; the last week I was there someone shot a probable B&C non-typical from his "roadside stand." (Maine only prohibits shooting from, on or near *paved* roads.)

The old rule of getting a mile from the road is more than adequate there. In 8 days of covering a lot of ground, I never met anyone off the road at all -- my partner saw one guy. I think I saw unfamiliar bootprints 2 or 3 times.

Of course, all of this goes hand in hand with a success rate in the mid-single digits.

John

 
Posts: 1246 | Location: Northern Virginia, USA | Registered: 02 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Cal,
I have hunted world wide and constantly for over 55 years and I have probably 20 or more rifles, but openning day of season in Idaho will find me off the beaten track with my old and dearly loved Win. M-94 26" barrel 25-35...hunting Mule Deer...It takes me to a place when I was your age and hunting was a calm and peacefull event and held the same place in our minds as Christmas and Thanksgiving...the kids stacking their hunting rifles in the class rooms so they could grab them and go hunt when school was out at 3;00...If they even showed up for school on the first couple of days of hunting season, most didn't....

Things have changed and will change even more, but it's young men like yourself who have to preserve the tradition that some of us have laid at your feet. Are you going to except that responsibility or just "quit hunting", the future of hunting is up to you....

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42225 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
<10point>
posted
Wise words Atkinson.........wise words............10
 
Reply With Quote
<Paladin>
posted
Atkinson, how I envy you the use of your .25-35: in Indiana, we're still fighting to get the use of deer rifles approved for private lands. I have a fine old Winchester 94 in .25-35 which I wish to use here for at least one classic deer hunt before I die, and I especially want to do it legally.

What load(s) do you prefer in your .25-35?

Paladin

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hunting on someone else's property is not a birthright. Permission to do so should be approached circumspectly and cherished as a privledge. When I was a boy, the population was much thinner than now. Now the population has more than doubled and there is a great deal more discretionary income so you have many more folks wanting to do the same things you like to do. And less places to do them. I don't know if the slob to careful outdoorsman ratio is any higher but it certainly seems the slobs are more sloven and much more in your face. Also, and this is a biggy, don't forget our greedy lawyers and plaintiffs. Here in West Va, if your lands is not posted and some clown runs his atv off a cliff, he whips out his cell phone and calls his lawyer and doctor in that order.
 
Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia