Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
quote: Go with he 7x64 and heavy bullets, if yu don�t want something more powerful as the .30-06, the 8x57IS or the 9,3x62. They are not to rough to shot with a proper rifle, and it no problem to shoot foxes with 9,3 full metal jacket. However, a big boar with a light rifle can be a real problem. Yours, Fritz | |||
|
one of us |
You'll do fine with any of them. If you were in the U.S., I would recommend the .270, but in Europe, the 7 x 64 may be just as readily available. You'll gain only a little in going to the 7mm Remington Magnum, but if you find it in a rifle you like, it will serve you well. | |||
|
one of us |
the 270 is fine cal to use on any of those beasts you mentioned. | |||
|
<Don Martin29> |
I would go with one of the 7MM's to get the heavier bullets for the boar. But bullet selection to match the game is very important with these small bores. The writer mentions a concern for shocking power. Again with the optimum bullet all of these cartridges will be similar. I would go with the lighter rifle at least for what I know of hunting in the USA. We carry them a lot more than we shoot them for sure. There would be nothing wrong with a 30-06 either for this application. In fact it would be my choice. | ||
one of us |
Go with the 7x64 (or its twin, U. S. .280 Remington) in a 24" barrel, and don't look back. I know from my own experience that it will reliably kill game up to 500 kilograms at distances in excess of 200 meters if you use decent 160 or 175 grain bullets, and it is easy on the ears and shoulder. | |||
|
<350RM> |
Thanks for the input, fellows. The rifle will be a Blaser, it weights between 2.7 and 3kg, and lenght is between 93 and 102cm. Nothing really clumsy, you see. The 7X64 is the choice of reason, it seems. Thanks again olivier | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia