The Accurate Reloading Forums
270 enough for elk?

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3411043/m/44210181

25 April 2003, 07:39
Hollywood
270 enough for elk?
Being from and hunting only in Texas my whole like, the largest caliber rifle I own is a 270. It's looking good that I'll finally get to travel north this year and go on my first elk hunt. Is a 270 enough gun for elk or should I consider acquiring a larger caliber weapon? Not that having to get another gun is a bad thing [Big Grin] .

Thanks
MDH
25 April 2003, 07:47
jrslate
The .270 is certainly enough for elk, just ask the thousands of hunters around the Pacific Northwest who use them every year.

Good luck on your hunt.

Joel Slate
Slate & Associates, LLC
www.slatesafaris.com

7mm Rem Mag Page www.slatesafaris.com/7mm.htm
25 April 2003, 07:49
MtElkHunter
A 270 will work fine. I have killed a lot of elk over the years, several of them with a 270 and my wife has also killed a few with a 270. We have never had any problems. Shot placement is more critical with a 270 than a larger calibur and you have to limit the range a little more than with a bigger gun. Use a heavy bullet and place your shot well and you will not have any problems. If you just cannot live without another gun, one of the flavors of 338 is just about the ideal elk gun.
25 April 2003, 08:16
Marsh Mule
MDH1053;
As long as you can do your part the .270 Win will do it's part. [Wink]
25 April 2003, 08:23
ACRecurve
The 270 works best on elk using 150 grain bullets and placing your shot carefully. I'm surprised you haven't gotten more replies to this---some may propound that a 338 Win is the bare minimum---but the 270 will do just fine. I always take a backup rifle in case something unfortunate happens. Take whatever you shoot the best!

Good Hunting,
25 April 2003, 08:37
rifleman1
Shot placement is critical with any caliber - I lost a fine bull one year because I hit it in the paunch with a 210 NP in a 338 WM - went down at the shot - 200 yds - but I knew by the way it went down I hit it too far back - waited a few minutes then went after it in the timber - it got up and walked over the ridge - all I could could see was trees and I shot a few of them until no more ammo - very frustrating day - hunted for two days and could not find him. I have now worked up a load with a 160 NP semi spitz in my 270 = 2850 fps - it has the BC of a 25 cal 120 gr bullet (.435) - so it will carry well - hit hard - and deliver maximum energy - should be fine elk medicine.
25 April 2003, 09:42
Mikelravy
Elk are quite tough. Don't expect to bowl them over with anything. I wouldn't be afraid to use a 270 though if it was all I had.
25 April 2003, 12:22
John Y Cannuck
In truth, I'd prefer a 338WM, but I'd not be afraid to use a 150gr 270. In the right conditions, I'd use an even lighter gun, but let's not start that up again.
25 April 2003, 12:54
kudu56
Hell yes! But overated as far as I am concerned!
25 April 2003, 13:34
fredj338
With a good 150gr (Swift, NP, etc.) bullet I would say it is a minimum. I have to hunt in elk country as a nonres. I only get a week or so to hunt so I am not willing to wait for the perfect shot that I think is needed when hunting w/ the .270 class carts. I have toted a .280 on occasion, but my choice leans to .30-06/180gr & up for big bull elk. There is a big difference in size btwn. bulls vs cows & spikes. You'll be hooked after you knock down your 1st bull elk. [Big Grin]
I like riflemans load soggestion for the .270.

[ 04-25-2003, 04:35: Message edited by: fredj338 ]
25 April 2003, 13:49
TomP
quote:
Originally posted by MDH1053:
Being from and hunting only in Texas my whole like, the largest caliber rifle I own is a 270. It's looking good that I'll finally get to travel north this year and go on my first elk hunt. Is a 270 enough gun for elk or should I consider acquiring a larger caliber weapon? Not that having to get another gun is a bad thing [Big Grin] .

Thanks
MDH

Take bullets made for a thick animal.

Tom
25 April 2003, 13:51
Idaho Ron
If these bulls could talk they would say HELL YA a 270 works on elk.
The first one is my daughters. It fell to a single shot from her savage 110, 270 with a 130 gr hornady at 2800 fps.
The second fell to a single shot from my pre 64, 270 with a 140 gr hornady at 3000 fps. Ron
 -
 -
25 April 2003, 14:24
Steiny
Yep !
It will work on moose or grizz too.

When I was in AK a couple years ago moose hunting, one of the other hunters out of that camp killed a 60" big old moose with one shot from a .270.
25 April 2003, 14:40
<phurley>
I have a good buddy that hunts with a .270, never shoots over 200 yards, makes fun of us that do, always gets his Bull. I cannot remember when he didn't make a one shot kill. He uses tough premium bullets from 130 to 150 grains. He respects my .340 Wby and .358 STA, and I respect his .270, and both agree, shot placement is more important than chambering. [Wink] Good shooting.
25 April 2003, 16:54
RMK
Be careful with todays elk,most wear soft body armour and the average .270 or 06 will simply bounce off of them.
25 April 2003, 17:57
Nebraska
Ron,

I saw your name pop up on this thread and I was sure you were going to post those pics. I just love 'em. That pic of your daughter and her bull is a work of art. Two beauties!!! You're a very lucky man. [Big Grin]
26 April 2003, 01:33
Idaho Ron
Nebraska, Thanks. I am very proud of her she did a great job on that hunt for that bull. That picture was sent to the Idaho fish and Game for the possable use on a cover shot fo the big game regs. The problem was the blood! They liked the picture but not the blood and refused the picture.
Ron
26 April 2003, 02:23
Brad
Ron, those are fine bulls indeed! My friend Mark Dobrenski who posts here calls his 270 "The 30-06 Improved"... that gives me a kick!

BTW, anyone even semi decent with photo-shop could take the blood out of that photo and it'd be impossible to know it was ever there... just a thought.

Brad
26 April 2003, 02:24
buckmaster
I think that a 270 would be plenty but I like my 7mm rem mag. But like every one else I would have to say shot placement is the most important thing to.
26 April 2003, 02:44
stubblejumper
The 270 will certainly work.I have even killed elk with the 257 wby but I now use bullets of at least 7mm and preferably .308" for a little extra insurance.
26 April 2003, 02:52
Johnny Ringo
And then use deep-penetrating bullets??
26 April 2003, 05:15
Idaho Ron
Brad, I call mine a 27-06 sometimes too [Big Grin] . I offered to take the blood out with paint shop but the F&G wanted to use the orignal picture.
Ron
27 April 2003, 12:04
<257 AI>
Ron, didn't you know that elk aren't supposed to bleed when you shoot them? [Roll Eyes] I guess it's supposed to be a bloodless entry and exit. What do these guys want?
27 April 2003, 14:50
RMK
Well considering that most of your wildlife management is made up of borderline PETA members and woman,they'd like it to be a sport like golf. But they sure enjoy the shit out of the money generated from hunting licenses.
27 April 2003, 15:15
Gatehouse
Blood is wrong...Blood is not PC...

I take pains these days to make sure any animals I shoot while hunting does not bleed.

When I see blood, I faint...
27 April 2003, 20:54
billy375
270 with premium 150gr bullets is all you will need. So many people use 270's it aint even funny. Most people just don't want to get hit with the recoil of bigger guns when a 270 kills everything they shoot. [Wink] On the other hand sounds like a perfect exuse to the wife for another gun. [Smile]