THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
.270 Win or .270 Wby?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of JLHeard
posted
My dad went to the Yuma, AZ gunshow this weekend and came up with a nice FN-Mauser-actioned rifle in .270 Win. He offered it to me and the choice of having it rebarreled in .270 Wby (we have a great gunsmith, so the end product either way will shoot).

I've been wanting a .270 M70 for awhile, but I don't know much about the .270 Wby. I'd be using it for desert mule deer, whitetails and probably antelope (or my .300 H&H Mag).

Right now I have M70's in .300 H&H, .35 Whelan AI and .375 H&H, so I need something on the lighter side of .300. And I'm also a big fan of "classic rifles in classic calibers". Call me a romantic if you will .

Thanks for the feedback in advance.
 
Posts: 580 | Location: Mesa, AZ | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My advice would be to keep it in .270 Winchester. In addition to rebarreling, going to the .270 Weatherby would require opening up the bolt face to accept the larger magnum-size head of the Weatherby case. You would get about 200 f.p.s. greater velocity from the Weatherby, but at considerably greater expense for brass and powder. The .270 Winchester is one of the greatest calibers ever invented, especially for the tasks you mention.

[ 01-16-2003, 22:43: Message edited by: LE270 ]
 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
<Savage 99>
posted
JL,

First of all my compliments on informing us of the rest of your battery. So many times we speculate here on the question and then find that the person already has that caliber.

The first thing to do is to shoot the 270 as is. That cartridge is the smallest, and therefore has the least recoil, of any that will be completely satisfactory in the 49 states.

Changing it to a Weatherby is going to cost money that would be better spent on other things. I would rather have a 270 Winchester anyway. Take that 270 step by step and use management by exception and do only to it what needs to be done.
 
Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Good replies thus far and I agree wholeheartedly with what's been said. The 270Wby is a great cartridge and one with which I am very familiar, but with you already having a 300mag there is no need of it. The 270WCF is THE 270 and still the best one, IMO.
 
Posts: 1148 | Location: The Hunting Fields | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
<green 788>
posted
" And I'm also a big fan of "classic rifles in classic calibers". Call me a romantic if you will."

I'm with you there. Go with the .270 win.

Here is my "O'Conner Special." It's a 1954 model 70, in .270 win. That's a Redfield 3 to 9 mounted in a Redfield JR mount and rings, put there in 1959 or 1960, and still doing well...

 -

Dan

[ 01-16-2003, 22:54: Message edited by: green 788 ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
JL... The 270 is such a wonderful cartridge, I would just keep it in 270 winchester. Perhaps you can save for the wby another day.
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
<Buliwyf>
posted
JL:

The very first thing you do is go hug your Dad and tell him you love him. That's right, tell him you love him.

Second thing you do is ask your Dad what he thinks the chambering should be. You two guys decide.

Sounds to me like your Father is a very special person.

Buliwyf
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
JLHeard

I would go with Buliwyf's advice.

Regards
cjw3
 
Posts: 189 | Location: Was Kansas, USA - Now South Australia | Registered: 03 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Green - Beautiful rifle and my sentiments exactly. Plus the 270 is pretty near perfect as it is. I wouldn't look twice at the Weatherby conversion.
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cjw3:
JLHeard

I would go with Buliwyf's advice.

Regards
cjw3

If you don't go with that advice pretty quick, I'll hug your Dad and tell him that I love him! [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 1346 | Location: NE | Registered: 03 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JLHeard
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Buliwyf:
JL:

The very first thing you do is go hug your Dad and tell him you love him. That's right, tell him you love him.

Second thing you do is ask your Dad what he thinks the chambering should be. You two guys decide.

Sounds to me like your Father is a very special person.

Buliwyf

Oh, don't worry. I do that all the time. I know I'm a very lucky person when it comes to dad. [Big Grin]

And it was his idea to rechamber it. There is some guy who wrote a reloading manual way back when that my dad learned to reload with. It seems that the .270 Wby on a Mauser action was his favorite. That's where he got the idea.

Me? I've read O'Conner and Keith (explains the big bores [Big Grin] ), so I want a .270 Win M70.
 
Posts: 580 | Location: Mesa, AZ | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Good Advice here. The 270. The magnum is great but more expesive to shoot with the brass and using more powder. (And I love the 270 WEatherby Mag [Smile] )

Hcliff
 
Posts: 305 | Location: Green Bay, WI | Registered: 09 September 2002Reply With Quote
<JOHAN>
posted
JLHeard

Don't fall for the weatherby or the silly 270 WSM [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
270 win is a great cartridge and doesn't need to be improved, shortend, fatter or faster [Big Grin] [Big Grin]

I think I would be a great match for your 300 and 375. I will make a really classic rifle tripple. The 270 covers the gap well and ammo is just too easy to find if you don't handload

/ JOHAN

[ 01-18-2003, 02:08: Message edited by: JOHAN ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Flip
posted Hide Post
The 270 Win is a great round keep it
 
Posts: 931 | Location: Nambia | Registered: 02 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Johan
You are a man of great taste. I can't see how you could get an uglier or a more overpriced rifle than a Blaser. To get them both in the same package is unbelievable.
 
Posts: 3174 | Location: Warren, PA | Registered: 08 August 2002Reply With Quote
<JOHAN>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Mikelravy:
Johan
You are a man of great taste. I can't see how you could get an uglier or a more overpriced rifle than a Blaser. To get them both in the same package is unbelievable.

Thankyou, to sharing my opinion about blaser r-93.

Unfortunatly there are people who are not as bringht as others. Look at Waltherhogs forum. If you are posting there expect no sane replies, Remember that I warned you [Big Grin]

/ JOHAN
 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia