Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
High vel. bone fragminte, maybe. A nice deer & the bullet certainly did it's job. | |||
|
one of us |
I had a similar experience while guiding a hunter using a 7mm RUM on elk - 160 TSX. No doubting the killing power but the entrance wound side was ruined. | |||
|
one of us |
I just posted my Missouri results. The 168 TSX from the .06 at 50 yards killed him quick, but I did not have any blood shot meat on the entrance. Only on the exit. Go figure. You can look at his pictures on the post if you want. | |||
|
one of us |
I'm definitely not complaining about performance.... I was just really shocked at how fast it opened up. I took three whitetails with the same load earlier in the season, but didn't do any of the butchering myself and didn't notice if it caused the same kind of entrance wound damage. On the same trip I also used the same load to cull three bison for a rancher. All three were taken with head shots at about 60 yards. Two were taken behind the ear and completely penetrated the skull. The third was taken with a frontal shot between the eyes. All three were instant kills. IMHO, a 160 grain bullet that will open up on the ribs of a deer yet still hang together to penetrate the skull of a bison is about all a guy can ask for! | |||
|
one of us |
I agree, just read my signature line! I spoke with Ty Herring at Barnes several times, he said emphatically, that these TSX bullets open very quickly. Of course, that is, if the hollow pt. does not close first on impact. | |||
|
one of us |
I am a big fan of the TSX. I used the 168 from my 300 SAUM on elk this year and performance was ideal. I would not choose the 160 from fast 7 mag based on what I have seen. No doubt they kill, but losing two shoulders is a bit much for my taste. I would not fault another hunter for choosing them unless it was for a meat hunt. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia