Any good bullet with a careful shot but I would choose a 156 gr. I've used Norma's Alaska for most of my moose but they are a bit soft. Norma's Oryx, Lapua's Mega or Swift's A-frame is what I would use now.
Posts: 544 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 27 October 2001
You all are talking about a 6.5 X 55 right? Nobody actually specified the cartridge other than "Swede", which may be self explanatory, but the charge that Lawdog listed does not seem Swede-ish to me. Just seeking clarification. I too have been wondering about using the 6.5 X 55 for Moose... in Alaska. My "magnumaniac" buddies tell me it is waay out of it's league for moose and then I point out some facts about the moose in Europe taken with the round. Moose are much bigger here so it is pushing your luck I am told. Not wanting to test a theory on a fine moose I would like to hear a bit of the details involved with the shots that bagged a bull. What is the maximum moose range with those loads? How was the penetration?
There was an informal poll taken here some time back among the Europeans and what they use for moose. Contrary to the popular belief, most of them were using .308s and .30-06s, as I recall. -Fred
I too have been wondering about using the 6.5 X 55 for Moose... in Alaska. My "magnumaniac" buddies tell me it is waay out of it's league for moose and then I point out some facts about the moose in Europe taken with the round. Moose are much bigger here so it is pushing your luck I am told. Not wanting to test a theory on a fine moose I would like to hear a bit of the details involved with the shots that bagged a bull. What is the maximum moose range with those loads? How was the penetration?[/QB][/QUOTE]
Posts: 207 | Location: Nicolet National Forest, WI, USA | Registered: 21 January 2002
I would use the 160 Hornady roundon moose /deer/ bear It has more SD than the 308 180 gr bullet. Do some research yourself .The 6.5 x 55 is a small bullet granted but this round is long and gets the job done. Shot placement of course is important. The nice thing about this cal is that it is mild in recoil even with hot reloads. I have a model 38 made in 1942 with a chopped stock. This model will take the powder that the older model 96 can not. In short the 156/ or 160 gr .264cal is up to the task. If the shooting range is short and you do not mind the recoil bring the 45/70 lever.It makes a bigger hole.
quote:Originally posted by Johnny Ringo: WsrtnHntr,
I lean toiwards the 160 Hornady RN myself....have you any experience with this bullet?
None whatsoever, but it sure looks like a peach! If I had a 6,5 I would be for getting some experience with them.
Ive been trying to talk my brother into trying them in his Sweede but he is just starting to gather reloading equipment. I dont remember which Gun rag it was but one of them recently had some very high praise for them.
Posts: 10190 | Location: Tooele, Ut | Registered: 27 September 2001
I have over the years shot a lot of game with the 160 gr Hornaday RN. in the Swede. Just stuff it with RL 22. Aso for it being to light for Alaska moose, well guys have used 243's. Put one thru the heart /lungs and well your skining knife better be sharpe.
Posts: 1070 | Location: East Haddam, CT | Registered: 16 July 2000